The Influence of Elements of Technology and Soil-Climatic Factors on the Agrobiological Properties of Onobrychis Viciifolia

• Autorzy: Kovalenko, Vitalii , Tonkha, Oksana , Fedorchuk, Mykhailo , Butenko, Andrii , Toryanik, Valentina , Davydenko, Gennadiy , Bordun, Roman , Kharchenko, Serhii , Polyvanyi, Anton
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The significance of this study stems from the imperative to justify and advance agrobiological foundations aimed at enhancing the cultivation practices of Onobrychis viciifolia. There exists a compelling necessity to refine agronomic methodologies and streamline their comprehensive efficacy within the technological phases of cultivation. This study is aim to provide a critical analysis of scientific problem of substantiation of biological and organic foundations of the technology of Onobrychis viciifolia growing. Innovative technological interventions were formulated by extrapolating discerned patterns of influence pertaining to climatic and meteorological factors. Patterns governing the growth, development, and productivity formation of Onobrychis viciifolia were identified, and both the theoretical and practical principles of contemporary methods for cultivating perennial legumes were established. The chemical compound of aboveground biomass of Onobrychis viciifolia is varied depending on researched factors. Fertilization practically did not increase the productivity of Onobrychis viciifolia. The natural fertility of low-humus chernozem soil ensures the formation of a high, stable yield without fertilizing. This is the evidence that Onobrychis viciifolia compares favorably with other perennial legumes. Due to its biological characteristics, it is much more effective, especially in leveraging natural factors for the yield formation, i.e., it plays a significant role in the biologization of plant production, and in obtaining the most environmentally friendly, high–quality, yet cheap feed. The outcomes derived from the conducted research indicate that, under uniform soil conditions and varying fertilizer levels, the mowing height emerges as the predominant factor. The highest concentrations of nutrients within the overground biomass of Onobrychis viciifolia were noted at a cutting altitude of 11 centimeters. Concurrently, an elevation in crude protein and ash content was observed, accompanied by a concomitant reduction in the index of crude fiber.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Onobrychis viciifolia; ecological biomass; yield formation; fertilization; mowing height; yield; phenological phases; ecological crop production; biological crop production

• Czasopismo: Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 25, iss. 5
• Strony: 179--190
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 60 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kovalenko, Vitalii

• National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Heroyiv Oborony Str., 13, Kyiv, 03041, Ukraine

autor

Tonkha, Oksana

• National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Heroyiv Oborony Str., 13, Kyiv, 03041, Ukraine

autor

Fedorchuk, Mykhailo

• Mykolayiv National Agrarian University, Georgiy Gongadze Str. 9, Mykolayiv, Ukraine

autor

Butenko, Andrii

• Sumy National Agrarian University, H. Kondratieva Str., 160, Sumy, 40021, Ukraine,

autor

Toryanik, Valentina

• Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A.S. Makarenko, 87, Romenska Str., Sumy, 40002, Ukraine

autor

Davydenko, Gennadiy

• Sumy National Agrarian University, H. Kondratieva Str., 160, Sumy, 40021, Ukraine

autor

Bordun, Roman

• Institute of Agriculture of Northern East of National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Parkova Str., 3, Sumy region, village Sad, Ukraine

autor

Kharchenko, Serhii

• Sumy National Agrarian University, H. Kondratieva Str., 160, Sumy, 40021, Ukraine

autor

Polyvanyi, Anton

• Sumy National Agrarian University, H. Kondratieva Str., 160, Sumy, 40021, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• 1. Albayrak S., Türk M., Yuksel O. 2009. Effects of Phosphorus Fertilization and Harvesting Stages on Forage Yield and Quality of Woolypod vetch. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 14(1), 30–40.
• 2. Bobos І.M., Fedosy I.O., Tonkha O.L., Zavadska O.V., Olt J.R. 2019. Optimization of plant densities of dolichos (Dolichos lablab l. var. lignosus) bean in the right bank of forest steppe of Ukraine. Agronomy Research, 17(6), 2195–2202. doi.org/10.15159/ar.19.223
• 3. Borreani Orreani G., Peiretti Eiretti P.G., Tabacco O.E. 2003. Evolution of yield and quality of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) in the spring growth cycle. Agronomie, 23, 193–201.
• 4. Bulyhin S.Yu., Tonkha O.L. 2018. Biological evaluation of the rationality of soil usage in agriculture. Agricultural science and practice, 5(1), 23–29.
• 5. Cassida K.A., Griffin, T.S., Rodriguez O.J., Patching S.C., Hesterman O.B., Rust S.R. 2000. Protein degradability and forage quality in maturing alfalfa, red clover, and birdsfoot trefoil. Crop Science, 40, 209–215.
• 6. Chwietczuk P. 2021. Proposals of Universal Algorithms for the Automation of the Irrigation Process of Plant Crops. Agricultural Engineering, 25(1), 115–124. doi.org/10.2478/agriceng-2021-0009
• 7. Comakli B., Tas N. 1996. The effects of phosphorus fertilization on the chemical composition of hay of some vetch species. III. Grassland and Forage Congress in Turkey, Erzurum, 293–300.
• 8. Dalzell S.A., Shelton H.M. 2002. Genotypic variation in proanthocyanidin status in the Leucaena genus. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 138, 209–220.
• 9. Delgano I., Salvia J., Buil I., Anderes´ C. 2008. Agronomic variability of a collection of sainfoin accessions. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 6, 401–407.
• 10. Demydasʹ H.I., Kvitko H.P., Kovalenko V.P. 2013. Bahatorichni bobovi travy yak osnova pryrodnoyi intensyfikatsiyi kormorobnytstva. TOV «Niland-LTD». Kyiv, 322.
• 11. Dospekhov B.A. 1985. Methods of field experience. Kolos, Moscow, 351. (in Russian).
• 12. Gebrehiwot L., Beuselinck P.R., Roberts C.A. 2002. Seasonal variations in condensed tannin concentration of three Lotus species. Agronomy Journal, 94, 1059–1065.
• 13. Giner-Chaver B.I., Soest P.J., Robertson Obertson J.B., Lascano OC., Reed J.D., Pell A.N. 1997. A method for isolating condensed tannins from crude plant extracts with trivalent ytterbium. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 74, 359–368.
• 14. Gugała M., Sikorska A., Findura P., Kapela K., Malaga-Tobola U., Zarzecka K., Domanski L. 2019a. Effect of selected plant preparations containing Biologically active compounds on winter rape (Brassica Napus L.) Yielding. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(2), 2779–2789. doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1702_27792789
• 15. Gugała M., Sikorska A., Zarzecka K., Findura P., Malaga-Toboła U. 2019b. Chemical composition of winter rape seeds depending on the biostimulators used. Agronomy (Basel), 9(11), 716.
• 16. Haring D.A., Suter D., Amrhein N., Luscher A. 2007. Biomass allocation is an important determinant of tannin concentration in growing plants. Annals of Botany, 99, 111–120.
• 17. Hartwig U.A., Nosberger J. 1996. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation: a physiological link between plant and environment. In: Younie D (ed.) Legumes in Sustainable Farming Systems. Occasional Symposium. British Grassland Society, 30, 36–43.
• 18. Havrylianchyk R., Bilyk T., Hutsol T., Osadchuk O., Mudryk K., Jewiarz M., Wróbel M., Dziedzic K. 2020. Straw of Buckwheat as an Alternative Source of Biofuels. Renewable Energy Sources: Engineering, Technology, Innovation, 323–329. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13888-2_32
• 19. Heckendorn F., Haring D.A., Maurer V., Zinsstag J., Langhans W., Hertzberg H. 2006. Effect of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) silage and hay on established populations of Haemonchus contortus and Cooperia curticei in lambs. Veterinary Parasitology, 142, 293–300.
• 20. Honchar L., Mazurenko B., Sonko R., Kyrpa-Nesmiian T., Kovalenko R., Kalenska S. 2020. Biochemical responses of 5 buckwheat (Fagopirum esculentum Moench.) cultivars to seed treatment by Azospirillum brasilense. Agronomy Research, 18(3), 1680–1688. doi.org/10.15159/ar.20.080
• 21. Hryhoriv Y., Butenko A., Kozak M., Tatarynova V., Bondarenko O., Nozdrina N., Stavytskyi A., Bordun R. 2022. Structure components and yielding capacity of Camelina sativa in Ukraine. Agriculture and Forestry, 68(3), 93–102. doi.org/10.17707/AgricultForest.68.3.07
• 22. Karbivska U., Butenko A., Kozak M., Filon V., Bahorka M., Yurchenko N., Pshychenko, O., Kyrylchuk, K., Kharchenko, S., Kovalenko I. 2023. Dynamics of productivity of leguminous plant groups during long-term use on different nutritional backgrounds. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 24(6), 190–196. doi.org/10.12911/22998993/162778
• 23. Karpenko O., Butenko Y., Rozhko V., Sykalo О., Chernega T., Kustovska A., Onychko V., Tymchuk D.S., Filon V., Novikova A. 2022. Influence of agricultural systems on microbiological transformation of organic matter in wheat winter crops on typical black soils. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 23(9), 181–186. doi.org/10.12911/22998993/151885
• 24. Khmelovskyi V., Rogach S., Tonkha O., Rosamaha, Y. 2019. Quality evaluation of mixing fodder by mobile combined units. Engineering for Rural Development, 19–25. doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2019.18.N468
• 25. Kokovikhin S., Kovalenko V., Slepchenko A., Tonkha O., Kovalenko N., Butenko A., Ushkarenko V. 2020. Regularities of sowing alfalfa productivity formation while using different types of nitrogen fertilizers in cultivation technology. Modern Phytomorphology, 14, 35–39. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4453889
• 26. Kovalenko N., Kovalenko V., Hutsol T., Ievstafiieva Y., Polishchuk A. 2021. Economic efficiency and internal competitive advantages of grain production in the central region of Ukraine. Agricultural Engineering, 51–62. doi.org/ 10.2478/agriceng-2021-0004
• 27. Kovalenko V. Kovalenko N. Zasada M. Hutsol T. 2020. Economic efficiency of production of herbal granules. Turystyka i Rozwój Regionalny, 14, 127-137.
• 28. Kovalenko V., Kokovikhin S., Dobrovolska, E., Korzhenivska N., Kozak O. 2021a. Value of photosynthesis in growing meadow clover depending on technology elements. Engineering for rural development, 1638–1641. doi.org/10.22616/ ERDev.2021.20.TF351
• 29. Kovalenko V., Vozhegova R., Kokovikhin S., Drobitko A., Nurek T., Glowacki S., Hutsol T., Verkholantseva V., Tulej W. 2021b. Growing Technologies of Perennial Legumes. Monograph. Warsaw, 252. doi. org/10.22630/SGGW.IIM.9788382370225
• 30. Kovalenko V.P. 2015. Features in the formation of the crop of sainfoin sown depending on the action of agronomic factors. Taurian Scientific Bulletin. Agricultural sciences, 94, 32–37.
• 31. Kovalenko V.P., Kovalenko N.O. 2018. Planning of enterprise fodder base. Scientific journal Plant and Soil Science, 286, 35–42.
• 32. Kovalenko I., Vereshchahin I., Butenko Y., Kandyba N., Onychko V., Bakumenko O., Kovalenko V., Klochkova T. 2022. Rapid-analysis of flax varieties of the ukrainian national collection. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 23(3), 1–6. doi.org/10.12912/27197050/146384
• 33. Krawczuk A., Parafiniuk A., Przywara S., Huyghebaert B., Rabier F., Limbourg Q., Mostade O., and Kocira S. 2021. Technical parameters of biostimulant spraying a determinant of biometric traits and yield of soybean seeds. Agricultural Engineering, 25(1), 171–179. doi.org/10.2478/agriceng-2021-0014
• 34. Liu Z., Lane G.P.F., Davies W.P. 2008. Establishment and production of common sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop) in the UK. 1. Effects of sowing date and autumn management on establishment and yield. Grass and Forage Science, 63, 234–241.
• 35. Lorenz M.M., Eriksson T., Uden P., 2010. Effect of wilting, silage additive, PEG treatment, and tannin content on the distribution of N between different fractions after ensiling of three different sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) varieties. Grass and Forage Science, 65, 175–184.
• 36. Luescher A., Mueller-Harvey I., Soussana J.F., Rees R.M., Peyraud J.L. 2014. Potential of legume-based grassland-livestock systems in Europe: a review. Grass and Forage Science, 69(2), 206–218.
• 37. Lutsiak V., Hutsol T., Kovalenko N., Kwaśniewski D., Kowalczyk Z., Belei S., Marusei T. 2021. Enterprise Activity Modeling in Walnut Sector in Ukraine. Sustainability, 13, 13027. doi.org/10.3390/su132313027.
• 38. Manko Iu.P. 2007. Methods of assessing the adequacy of phenomena and technologies in agriculture. Naukovi pratsi Instytutu bioenerhetychnykh kultur i tsukrovykh buriakiv, 9, 26–31.
• 39. Mazurenko B., Novytska N., Honchar L. 2020. Response of spring and facultative triticale on microbial preparation (Azospirillum brasilense and Bacillus polymyxa) by different nitrogen nutrition. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 21(4), 763–774. doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/21.4.2914
• 40. Paolini V., De La Farge F., Prevot F., Dorchies P.H., Hoste H. 2005. Effects of the repeated distribution of sainfoin hay on the resistance and resilience of goats naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes. Veterinary Parasitology, 127, 277–283.
• 41. Radchenko M., Trotsenko V., Butenko A., Masyk I., Bakumenko O., Butenko S., Dubovyk O., Mikulina M. 2023. Peculiarities of forming productivity and quality of soft spring wheat varieties. Agriculture and Forestry, 69(4), 19–30. doi.org/10.17707/AgricultForest.69.4.02
• 42. Rebole A.C., Alzueta L.T., Ortiz C., Barro M.L. 2004. Rodriguez; Caballero, R. Yields and chemical composition of different parts of the common vetch at flowering and at two seed filling stages. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(4), 550–557.
• 43. Schweizer E. 2006. Die Erhaltung der Esparsette (Onobrychis sativa L.). Available at: http://www.cpcskek.ch/fileadmin/pdf/NAP-PhaseII/NAP_02- 41_JB05.pdf
• 44. Shalyuta B., Kostitskaya Е. 2018. The Yield of Silphium Perfoliatum L. Depending on the Conditions of Cultivation. Agricultural Engineering, 22(2), 91– 97. doi.org/10.1515/agriceng-2018-0019
• 45. Shan M.H., Singh K.N., Kachroo D., Khanday B.A. 1991. Performance of lucerne and sainfoin under different cuttings and levels of phosphorus. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 36, 61–66.
• 46. Sikora J., Niemiec M., Szelag-Sikora A., Gródek-Szostak Z., Kuboń M., Komorowska M. 2020. The impact of a controlled-release fertilizer on greenhouse gas emissions and the effciency of the production of Chinese cabbage. Energies, 8(13), 2063. doi.org/10.3390/en13082063
• 47. Sobko M., Butenko Y., Davydenko G., Solarov O., Pylypenko V., Makarova V., Mikulina M., Samoshkina I., Antonovskyi O., Poriadynskyi V. 2023. Ecological and Economic Study of Wheat Winter Varieties by Different Geographical Origin. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 24(1), 12–21. doi.org/10.12912/27197050/154912
• 48. Szeląg-Sikora A., Sikora J., Niemiec M., Gródek-Szostak Z., Kapusta-Duch J., Kuboń M., Komorowska M., Karcz J. 2019. Impact of Integrated and Conventional Plant Production on Selected Soil Parameters in Carrot Production. Sustainability, 11, 5612.
• 49. Szparaga A., Kuboń M., Kocira S., Czerwińska E., Pawłowska A., Hara P., Kobus Z., Kwaśniewski D. 2019. Towards sustainable agriculture–agronomic and economic effects of biostimulant use in common bean cultivation. Sustainability, 11, 4575.
• 50. Thomson D.J. 1982. Nutritive and utilisation value of sainfoin. In: The Future of Sainfoin in British Agriculture. Hurley: The Grassland Research Institute, 8-11.
• 51. Tonkha O., Butenko A., Bykova O., Kravchenko Yu., Pikovska O., Kovalenko V., Evpak I., Masyk I., Zakharchenko E. 2020. Spatial heterogeneity of soil silicon in ukrainian phaozems and chernozems. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 22(2), 111–119. doi.org/10.12911/22998993/130884
• 52. Tonkha O., Nurek T., Kravchenko Yu., Sychevsʹkyy S., Bykova O., Menshov O., Kruglov O., Kovalenko V., Sonko R., Hutsol T., Glowacki S. 2021. Spatial heterogeneity of soil parameters in different forest-steppe landscapes of Ukraine. Monograph. Warszawa, 118. doi.org/10.22630/SGGW.IIM.9788375839968
• 53. Tonkha O.L., Sychevskyi S.O., Pikovskaya O.V, Kovalenko V.P. 2018. Modern approach in farming based on estimation of soil properties variability. 12th International Conference on Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment, 68–74. doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201803199
• 54. Tryhuba A., Bashynsky O., Hutsol T., Rozkosz A., Prokopova O. 2020. Parameters of the energy supply system of agricultural enterprises with using wind power installations. E3S Web Conf. 6th International Conference – Renewable Energy Sources (ICoRES 2019), 154. doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015404005
• 55. Tufenkci S., Erman M., Sonmez F. 2008. Effects of phosphorus and nitrogen application and Rhizobium inoculation on the yield and nutrient uptake of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia L.) under irrigated conditions in Turkey. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 49, 101–105.
• 56. Türk M., Albayrak S., Yuksel O. 2007. Effects of phosphorus fertilization and harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of narbon vetch. The New Zealand J Agric. Res., 50, 457–462.
• 57. Türk M., Çelik N. 2006. The effects of different row spaces and seeding rates on the hay and crude protein yields of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa Lam.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12(2), 175–181.
• 58. Voitovyk М., Butenko Y., Tkachenko M., Mishchenko Y., Tsyuk О., Obrazhyy S., Kopylova T. 2024. Assessment of the effect of sunflower agrocenosis on the characteristics of the structural and aggregate composition of typical black soil. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 25(1), 153–160. doi.org/10.12911/22998993/174778
• 59. Voloshun E.I., Avetisyan А.Т. 2017. Guide to fertilizing perennial legumes (alfalfa, clover, dandelion, sainfoin): method. Recommendations. Krasnoyarsk, 31.
• 60. Witek G., Gorzelany J., Matłok N. 2016. The impact of Dr Green foliar fertilization on plant health during the growing period as well as on the potato yield and quality (Jelly variety). Agricultural Engineering, 20(2), 151–158. doi.org/10.1515/agriceng-2016-0037

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12912/27197050/185709