Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The differences in morphology and age between single and paired males of an urban population of the European Blackbirds (Turdus merula) were studied in Żeromski park in the city of Szczecin (NW Poland) spanning 11 breeding seasons since 1998. The proportion of single to paired males in different age groups was established. Also, morphology features like the length of tail, wing and tarsus of 45 single males and 475 paired males were collected. We found that old males (after second year of life) formed pair bonds more often than the young males (in their second year of life). The probability of being a paired male in case of young males increased along with the tarsus length.
Słowa kluczowe
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
448--452
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Department of Vertebrate Zoology and Anthropology, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland, katarzynajarska@tlen.pl
autor
- Department of Vertebrate Zoology and Anthropology, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland
autor
- Department of Ecology and Environment Protection, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland
autor
- Department of Vertebrate Zoology and Anthropology, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland
Bibliografia
- 1. Bright A., Waas J.R. 2002 — Effects of bill pigmentation and UV reflectance during territory establishment in blackbirds — Anim. Behav.64: 207–213.
- 2. Cézilly F., Boy V., Tourenq C.J., Johnson, A.R. 1997 — Age-assortative mating in the greater flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber roseus — Ibis, 139:331–336.
- 3. Desrochers A., Magrath R.D. 1993 — Environmental predictability and remating in European blackbirds — Behav. Ecol. 4: 271–275.
- 4. Desrochers A., Magrath R.D. 1996 — Divorce in the European blackbird: seeking greener pastures (In: Partnerships in birds: the study of monogamy, Ed. J.M. Black) — Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 344–401.
- 5. Faivre B., Préault M., Théry M., Secondi J., Patris B., Céziliy F. 2001 —Breeding strategy and morphological characters in an urban population of blackbirds, Turdus merula — Anim. Behav. 61: 969–974.
- 6. Gibson M.R., Langen A.T. 1996 — How do animals choose their mates —Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 468–470.
- 7. Hesler N., Mundry R., Sacher T., Coppack T., Bairlain F., Dabelsteen T.2010 — Song repertoire size correlates with measures of body size in European blackbirds — Behaviour, 149: 645–665.
- 8. Hill G.E., Nolan P.M., Stoehr A.M. 1999 — Pairing success relative to plumage redness and pigment symmetry in the house finch: temporal and geographic constancy — Behav. Ecol. 10: 48–53.
- 9. Hosken J.D., House M.C. 2011 — Sexual selection — Curr. Biol. 21:62–65.
- 10. Leonard M.L., Picman J. 1987 — Nesting mortality and habitat selection by Marsh Wrens — The Auk, 104: 491–495.
- 11. Mateos C., Carranza J. 1995 — Female choice for morphological features of male ring-necked pheasants — Anim. Behav. 49: 737–748.
- 12. O'Brien L.E., Dawson D.R. 2010 — Plumage color and food availability affect male reproductive success in a socially monogamous bird — Behav. Ecol. 22: 66–72.
- 13. Partecke J., Van't Hof T.J., Gwinner E. 2005 — Underlying physiological control of reproduction in urban and forest-dwelling European blackbirdsTurdus merula — J. Avian. Biol. 36: 295–305.
- 14. Price T.D. 1984. — Sexual selection on body size on body size, territory and plumage variables in a population of Darwins finches — Evolution, 38:327–341.
- 15. Probst J.P., Hayes J.R. 1987 — Pairing success of Kirtland's Warblers in marginal vs. suitable habitat — Auk, 104: 234–241.
- 16. R Core Team 2014 — R: A language and environment for statistical computing — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.http://www.R-project.org/.
- 17. Rohwer S. 1982 — The evolution of reliable and unreliable badges of fighting ability — Am. Zool. 22: 531–546.
- 18. Ryan J.M., Akre L.K., Kirkpatrick M. 2007 — Mate choice — Curr. Biol. 17:313–316.
- 19. Sirkiä M.P., Laaksonen T. 2009 — Distinguishing between male and territory quality: females choose multiple traits in the pied flycatcher —Anim. Behav. 78: 1051–1060.
- 20. Smith A.C., Koper K., Francis C.M., Fahrig L. 2009 — Confronting collinearity: comparing methods for disentangling the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation — Landscape Ecol. 24: 1271–1285.
- 21. Snow D.W. 1988 — A study of Blackbirds, 2nd ed. British Museum of Natural History. London, UK.
- 22. Streif M., Rasa O.A.E. 2001 — Divorce and its consequences in the Common Blackbird Turdus merula — Ibis, 143: 554–560.
- 23. Svensson L. 1992 — Identification Guide to European Passerines. British Trust for Ornithology — Stockholm, pp. 368.
- 24. Wysocki D. 2002 — Biometrical analysis of an urban population of the Blackbird (Turdus merula) in Szczecin (NW Poland) — Ring, 24: 69–76.
- 25. Wysocki D. 2004a — Within-season divorce rate in an urban population of European blackbird Turdus merula — Ardea, 92: 219–228.
- 26. Wysocki D. 2004b — Alternative mating strategies in the urban population of European blackbird Turdus merula in Szczecin (NW Poland) — Ardea, 92: 103–112.
- 27. Wysocki D. 2006 — Factors affecting the between — season divorce rate in the urban population of the European Blackbird Turdus merula in north-western Poland — Acta Ornithol. 41: 71–78.
- 28. Wysocki D., Adamowicz J., Kościów R., Śmietana P. 2004 — The size of breeding territory in an urban population of the Blackbird (Turdus merula) in Szczecin (NW Poland) — Ornis Fenn. 81: 1–12.
- 29. Wysocki D., Kiriaka B. 2007 — Wing to tail length ratio in European Blackbirds (Turdus merula L.) of different age — Pol. J. Ecol. 55:121–125.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-51d3159a-b571-4c93-9088-032ded66d88b