The Essence of Multimodal Travel and Key Standards for Data Exchange in Public Transport

• Autorzy: Ejdys, Stanisław , Dzik, Renata , Kowal, Barbara , Dudzicz, Martyna , Piasecki, Adam , Górka, Wojciech , Nowak, Elżbieta , Markowska, Ewelina , Witkowski, Dominik
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The concept of multimodal transport has recently attracted much interest. It is user-oriented, i.e. the passenger planning his trip. To properly plan and prepare a mobility offer, it is necessary to know the mobile behaviour of travellers or their changes. Both the travel history and communication preferences of passengers can contribute to the design of a mobility distribution model in which various modes of transport offered by different operators are integrated into one service provided within one digital platform. The study aims to present the concept of multimodal travel and show the added value for the traveller: the synergy of combining ticket purchase and payment channels and a wide range of transport options. The authors highlight two key public transport data exchange standards: Open Journey Planner (OJP) and General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS). Their goal is to improve the quality of public transport services and provide travellers with better access to information. The article was developed as part of the Network Management Planning and Control & Mobility Management in a Multimodal Environment and Digital Enablers project – an acronym of the MOTIONAL project – implemented by the Research and Development Ecosystem created at PKP S.A. The article's content is part of the WP20 work package Development: Integration of Railways with other means of transport. In particular, it refers to Task 20.1, Improving railway integration using B2B intermodal services, which includes Subtask 20.1.1, Providing MaaS platforms for B2B intermodal services.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

multimodal transport; passengers; means of transport; mobility service; standards for data exchange; public transport

• Czasopismo: Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Tom 26
• Strony: 691--699
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 38 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Ejdys, Stanisław

• Ignacy Moscicki’s University of Applied Sciences in Ciechanów, Poland ,

autor

Dzik, Renata

• Ignacy Moscicki’s University of Applied Sciences in Ciechanów, Poland

autor

Kowal, Barbara

• AGH University of Krakow, Poland

autor

Dudzicz, Martyna

• Łukasiewicz Research Network – Institute of Innovative Technologies EMAG: Katowice, Poland

autor

Piasecki, Adam

• Łukasiewicz Research Network – Institute of Innovative Technologies EMAG: Katowice, Poland

autor

Górka, Wojciech

• Łukasiewicz Research Network – Institute of Innovative Technologies EMAG: Katowice, Poland

autor

Nowak, Elżbieta

• Lodz Agglomeration Railway Łódź, Poland

autor

Markowska, Ewelina

• Lodz Agglomeration Railway Łódź, Poland

autor

Witkowski, Dominik

• Lodz Agglomeration Railway Łódź, Poland

Bibliografia

• Chamier-Gliszczyński, N. (2012). Modeling system mobility in urban areas. Congress Proceedings, CLC 2012: Carpathian Logistics Congress, 501-508, 111467.
• Chamier-Gliszczyński, N. (2012a). Structure analysis of system mobility in urban areas. Congress Proceedings, CLC 2012: Carpathian Logistics Congress, 509-515, 111467, Jesenik, Czech Republic, Tanger Ltd.
• Chamier-Gliszczyński, N., Bohdal, T. (2016). Mobility in urban areas in environment protection. Rocznik Ochrona Srodowiska, 18(1), 387-399.
• Chen, E., Stathopoulos, A., Nie Y. (2022). Transfer station choice in a multimodal transit system: An empirical study. Transp. Res. A., 165, 337-355.
• Dąbrowski, D., Michałowska, K. (2023). Comments on the need to strengthen passengers' rights in multimodal transport in European Union law. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, LXXXV(2), 158-166. (in Polish)
• Dyczkowska, J., Olkiewicz, M., Chamier-Gliczynski, N., Królikowski, T. (2023). Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) as a solution platform for the city and the region: case study. Procedia Computer Science, 225, 4092-4100, 196245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.405
• Ejdys, S. (2017). Coherent and sustainable transport system of Warmia and Mazury. Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, 4(88), 199-212. (in Polish). https://doi.org/10.15290/ose.2017.04.88.15
• Ejdys, S. (2021). Model of a Sustainable Transport System on the Example of Olsztyn. Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska, 23, 811-822. https://doi.org/10.54740/ros.2021.055
• Evangelatos, S. (2016), Mobility as a Service (MaaS) Concept and Landscape, EuTravel.
• Kager, R., Bertolini L., te Brommelstroet M. (2016). Characterisation of and reflections on the synergy of bicycles and public transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 85, 208-219.
• Kauf, S. (2022). Intelligent transport: challenges for smart city, In: Modern solutions in public transport in local government units / Wieczorek Iwona, Sadowski Adam (red.), Narodowy Instytut Samorządu Terytorialnego, 45-78. (in Polish)
• Kłodawski, M., Jachimowski, R, Chamier-Gliszczyński, N. (2024). Analysis of the Overhead Crane Energy Consumption Using Different Container Loading Strategies in Urban Logistics Hubs. Energies, 17(5), 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17050985
• Koźlak, A. (2020). Mobility-as-a Service as a progress in transport integration. Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 23(5). (in Polish). 0000-0003-4127-6911
• Krizek, K.J., Stonebraker, E.W. (2010). Bicycling and Transit – A Marriage Unrealised. Transportation Research Record, 2144(1), 161-167.
• Łukasiewicz, A., Świtała, M., Kamińska, E., Regulska K. (2023). Sustainable urban mobility and MaaS implementation – selected European and Polish case studies. Roads and Bridges – Drogi i Mosty, 22, 225-241.
• Matysam, M., Kamargianni, M. (2017). A holistic overview of the mobility as a service ecosystem, Transportation Research Conference, Gyor 2017.
• Martens, K. (2007). Promoting bike-and-ride: The Dutch experience. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(4), 326-338.
• Mohanty, S., Bansal, S., Bairwa, K. (2017). Effect of integration of bicyclists and pedestrians with transit in New Delhi, Transport Policy, 57, 31-40.
• Pawłowska, B., Bąk, M., Borkowski, P. (2014). Scenarios for the development of long-distance passenger transport in the European Union until 2030. Logistyka, 4, 3127-3143. (in Polish)
• Parker, G.G., Marshall, W.A., Chan, P. (2016). Sangeet Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. WW Norton & Company, 78-81.
• Radzimski, A., Gadziński J. (2019). Travel behaviour in a post-socialist city, European Spatial. Research and Policy, 26(1), 43-60.
• Schaller, B. (2018). The new automobility: Lyft, Uber and the future of American cities. Schaller Consulting, 34-35.
• Standing, C., Standing S., Biermann S. (2018). The implications of the sharing economy for transport. Transport Reviews, 39(2), 226-242.
• Stenström, Ch., Galar, D., Aditya, P. (2012). Performance Indicators of Railway Infrastructure. Int. J. Railw. Technol., 1(3). https://doi.org/10.4203/ijrt.1.3.1
• Tsenkova, S., Mahalek, D. (2014). The impact of planning policies on bicycle-transit integration in Calgary. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 2(1), 126-146.
• Yaraghi, N., Shamika R. (2017). The current and future state of the sharing economy. Brookings India IMPACT Series No. 032017, 22-23.
• Wozniak, W., Sąsiadek, M., Stryjski, R., Mielniczuk, J., Wojnarowski, T. (2016). An algorithmic concept for optimising the number of handling operations in an intermodal terminal node. Proceedings of the 28th International Business Information Management Association Conference – Vision 2020: Innovation Management, Development Sustainability, and Competitive Economic GrowthPages 1490-1500, 126153.
• Zhou Li J., Zhang K., Zhang L. (2012). A Multimodal Trip Planning System With Real-Time Traffic and Transit Information. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(2).
• Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. A European vision for Passengers: Communication on Passenger Rights in all transport modes /* COM/2011/0898 final */ (in Polish)
• European Commission, Commission staff working document (2014). Towards a roadmap for delivering EU-wide multimodal travel information, planning, and ticketing services, SWD (2014) 194 final.
• European Parliament resolution of 23 October 2012 on passenger rights in all transport modes (2012/2067(INI)) (in Polish), Dz. Urz. UE CE 68 z 7.03.2014: 2-6.
• Extended system task customer information, (access: 8.04.2024)
• https://opentransportdata.swiss/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Beschreibung_OJP_1_ENG.pdf
• GTFS: Making Public Transit Data Universally Accessible. (access: 8.04.2024) https://gtfs.org/
• GTFS: Schedule Best Practices. (access: 8.04.2024) https://gtfs.org/schedule/best-practices
• ODbL. (access: 8.04.2024) https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
• Open Journey Planner. (2020). (access: 8.04.2024) https://opentransportdata.swiss/en/dataset/ojp2020
• SWD (2014). 194 final: 3. Por. także rezolucję Parlamentu Europejskiego dotyczącą tych kwestii: Rezolucja Parlamentu Europejskiego z 7 lipca 2015 r. w sprawie stworzenia multimodalnych modeli zintegrowana. (in Polish)
• UITP (2019). Report Mobility as a service, International Association of Public Transport, Brussels.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.54740/ros.2024.060