The concept of sustainable development and safety in maritime transport

• Autorzy: Popek, Marzenna
• Konferencja: 14th Summer Safety & Reliability Seminars - SSARS 2020, 26-30 September 2020, Ciechocinek, Poland
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The chapter presents opportunities of implementing the concept of sustainable development in sea transportation. The most important areas in which the concept is introduced are discussed. This revolves around the three important pillars of sustainable development: economic, social and environmental. Economic pillar is especially important in view of shipping’s role in the movement of about 90% of trade in goods, energy and raw materials. Social sustainability is based on improvement of maritime safety by development of safety regulations. Because operations at sea involve a high degree of physical risk, the shipping industry is committed to the continuous improvement of its environmental performance. The development and implementation of global standards for sustainable shipping cover safety, environmental protection, security and facilitation. The chapter also presents key advantages of implementing the concept of sustainable development in sea transportation.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

safety; transportation; environmental risks; sustainable development

• Czasopismo: Safety and Reliability of Systems and Processes
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Summer Safety and Reliability Seminar 2020
• Strony: 199--207
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Popek, Marzenna

• Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland,

Bibliografia

• [1] Andersson, K. & Salazar, C. M. 2015. Methanol as Marine Fuel. Report, Methanol Institute.
• [2] Besker, A., Ng, A, K. Y., McEvoy, D. & Mullet, J. 2018. Impolocation of climate change for shipping: ports and supply chains. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 9.
• [3] Bogalecka, M. & Kołowrocki, K. 2018. Prediction of critical infrastructure accident losses of chemical releases impacted by climate-weather change. Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEE IEEM), 788-792.
• [4] Charlebois, P. 2012. History of key conventions - IMO conventios. Interspill Conference, London.
• [5] Clarkson Research. 2018. Seaborne Trade Monitor 5(5).
• [6] ECOFYS. 2012. Potential of Biofuels for Shipping. Report,Utrecht, Netherlands.
• [7] Ellis, J. 2010 Undeclared Dangerous goods-risk implications for maritime transport. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 9, 5-27.
• [8] IMO. 2012. A concept of a sustainable maritime transport. World Maritime Day. London.
• [9] IMO. 2012. International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW Convention), London.
• [10] IMO. 2015. International Convention for the Safe of Life at Sea - SOLAS 1974/1978, London.
• [11] IMO. 2014. The International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships - MARPOL 73/78, London.
• [12] IMO. 2016. Roadmap for developing a comprehensive IMO startegy on reduction of GHS emmisions from ships. MEPC 70/18, London.
• [13] Interreg. 2014. Sustainable Transport. Extract of the Cooperation Programme, Rostock, Germany.
• [14] Jacobsen, M. Z. 2001. Strong reactive heating due to the mixing state of balack carbon in atmospheric aerosols. Nature, 409, 695-697.
• [15] Lee, P.T., Kwon, O. K. & Ruan, X. 2019. Sustainability challenges in m maritime transport and logistic industry and its way ahead. Sustainability, 11.
• [16] Leung, Y., Li, R. & Ji, N. 2017. Application of extended Dempster - Shafer theoty of evidence in accident probability estimation of dangerous goods transportation. Journal of Geographical Systems 19, 249-271.
• [17] Lopez-Navaro, A. A. 2014. Environmental factors and intermodal freight transportation: Analysis of the decision base on the case of Spanish motorways of the sea. Sustainability 6, 1544-1566.
• [18] Moreira, P. P. 2014. The Social and Environmental Eustainability of the Maritime Industry. Universidade Aberta, Lisbon.
• [19] Oliver, J. G., Janssens-Meanhout, G., Muntean, M. & Peters, J. A. 2016. Trends in Global Emissions. Report. European Comission. Joint Research Centre (JRC). Directorate C-Energy. Transport and Climate PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Hague.
• [20] Olymer, N., Comer, B., Roy, B., Mao, X. & Rutherford, D. 2017. Greenhouse gas emissions from global shipping. International Council of Clean Transport, Washington.
• [21] Roussanoglou, N. 2013. Eco-ships growing in numbers, could undermine value of older ships. Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide, Cyprus.
• [22] Swahn, M. 2009. Measuring Transport Energy Use and Emissions. NTM, Sweden.
• [23] Thana, E. 2013. Maritime transport and turism sustainable. AIIC. Azores, Portugal, 24-26.
• [24] Thyllen, M. 2011. Sustainable energy and transportation system. Perspectives, Baltic 21 Series 5, Berlin.
• [25] UNCTAD. 2017. Information Economy Report 2017: Digitalization, Trade and Development. New York and Geneva.
• [26] UNCTAD. 2015. Review of Maritime Transport. Geneva.
• [27] UNCTAD. 2018. Review of Maritime Transport. Geneva.
• [28] Wiessman, A. 2010. Slow steaming - a viable long-term option? Wartsila Technical Journal, Helsinki,Wartsila Corporation.
• [29] World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future, Oxford, 43.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.26408/srsp-2020-14