Selection of wireless communication technology for data transmission between wearable electronics devices and the receiver

• Autorzy: Korzeniewska, Ewa , Zawiślak, Rafał , Przybył, Szymon , Bilska, Anna , Sarna, Piotr

Warianty tytułu

PL

Dobór technologii komunikacji bezprzewodowej do transmisji danych pomiędzy urządzeniami elektroniki ubieralnej a odbiornikiem

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

One of the key issues in wearable electronics is data transmission over wireless networks. Among the most commonly used solutions are Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), as well as the ZigBee protocol, which are characterized by low power consumption and low implementation cost. The functionality of such solutions also depends on the energy consumption of the proposed solutions, as well as their size and weight. The purpose of this paper is to analyze selected communication techniques, which were compared in terms of their range and energy efficiency. The paper presents results on wireless communication tests. A comparison is presented of Bluetooth communication range carried out under different conditions, such as in a building where there were no obstacles and in a public facility. In order to compare Bluetooth communication parameters, different phone models were used.

PL

Jednym z kluczowych zagadnień dotyczących elektroniki noszonej jest transmisja danych w obrębie sieci bezprzewodowych. Do najczęściej wykorzystywanych rozwiązań należą: technologia Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), a także protokół ZigBee, charakteryzujące się niskim zużyciem energii oraz niską ceną implementacji. Funkcjonalność takich rozwiązań zależy także od energochłonności zaproponowanych rozwiązań, a także ich rozmiarów i wagi. Celem niniejszego opracowania jest analiza wybranych technik komunikacji, które zostały porównane pod względem ich zasięgu oraz energooszczędności. W pracy przedstawiono wyniki dotyczące testów komunikacji bezprzewodowej. Przedstawiono porównanie zasięgu komunikacji Bluetooth przeprowadzonych w różnych warunkach, takich jak w budynku, w którym nie było przeszkód oraz w obiekcie użyteczności publicznej. W celu porównania parametrów komunikacji Bluetooth zostały użyte różne modele telefonów.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

elektronika noszona; energooszczędność; BLE; Zigbee

EN

wearable electronics; energy efficiency; BLE; Zigbee

• Czasopismo: Przegląd Elektrotechniczny
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: R. 99, nr 12
• Strony: 303--306
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Korzeniewska, Ewa

• Faculty of Electrical, Electronic,Computer and Control Engineering, 18 B. Stefanowskiego St., 90-537 Lodz,

autor

Zawiślak, Rafał

• Faculty of Electrical, Electronic,Computer and Control Engineering, 18 B. Stefanowskiego St., 90-537 Lodz,

autor

Przybył, Szymon

• Faculty of Electrical, Electronic,Computer and Control Engineering, 18 B. Stefanowskiego St., 90-537 Lodz,

autor

Bilska, Anna

• Faculty of Electrical, Electronic,Computer and Control Engineering, 18 B. Stefanowskiego St., 90-537 Lodz,

autor

Sarna, Piotr

• Faculty of Electrical, Electronic,Computer and Control Engineering, 18 B. Stefanowskiego St., 90-537 Lodz,

Bibliografia

• [1] P. Kiełbasa, S. Kurpaska, M. Zagórda, T. Dróżdż, "System for automatic measurement of topsoil layer compaction and its spatial identification within the research area," 2018 Applications of Electromagnetics in Modern Techniques and Medicine (PTZE), Racławice, Poland, 2018, pp. 113-116, doi: 10.1109/PTZE.2018.8503213.
• [2] T. Dróżdż, A. Gąsiorski and Z. Posylek, "The method of noise reduction in systems with two signals paths," 2018 Applications of Electromagnetics in Modern Techniques and Medicine (PTZE), Racławice, Poland, 2018, pp. 41-44, doi: 10.1109/PTZE.2018.8503267.
• [3] E Korzeniewska, A Szczesny, P Lipinski, T Dróżdż, P Kiełbasa, A Miernik, K Politowski: Textronics Interdigitate Electrodes for Staphylococcus Aureus bacteria detecting, 2021 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1782 012015, DOI 10.1088/1742- 6596/1782/1/012015
• [4] R. Challoo, A. Oladeinde, N. Yilmazer, S. Ozcelik, and L. Challoo, ‘An Overview and Assessment of Wireless Technologies and Co- existence of ZigBee, Bluetooth and WiFi Devices’, Procedia Computer Science, vol. 12, pp. 386–391, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2012.09.091.
• [5] J.-S. Lee, Y.-W. Su, and C.-C. Shen, ‘A Comparative Study of Wireless Protocols: Bluetooth, UWB, ZigBee, and Wi-Fi’, in IECON 2007 - 33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Nov. 2007, pp. 46–51. doi: 10.1109/IECON.2007.4460126.
• [6] Styła, M.; Adamkiewicz, P.; Cieplak, T.; Skowron, S.; Dmowski, A.; Stokłosa, J. A Smart Building Resource Prediction, Navigation and Management System Supported by Radio Tomography and Computational Intelligence. Energies 2021, 14, 8260. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248260
• [7] Rymarczyk, T.; Styła, M.; Oleszek, M.; Maj, M.; Kania, K.; Adamkiewicz, P. Object detection using radio imaging tomography and tomographic sensors. Przeglad Elektrotechniczny 2020, 16, 2, doi: 10.15199/48.2020.01.40
• [8] Q. D. La, D. Nguyen-Nam, M. v. Ngo, H. Hoang, and T. Q. S. Quek, ‘Dense Deployment of BLE-based Body Area Networks: A Coexistence Study’, IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, vol. PP, pp. 1–1, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TGCN.2018.2859350.
• [9] Y.-H. Lee et al., ‘Wearable Textile Battery Rechargeable by Solar Energy’, Nano Lett., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 5753–5761, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1021/nl403860k.
• [10] K. Cherenack, C. Zysset, T. Kinkeldei, N. Münzenrieder, and G. Tröster, ‘Woven Electronic Fibers with Sensing and Display Functions for Smart Textiles’, Advanced Materials, 22 (45), 5178–5182, 2010, doi: 10.1002/adma.201002159.
• [11] S. Wu, P. Liu, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, and X. Qin, ‘Flexible and conductive nanofiber-structured single yarn sensor for smart wearable devices’, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 252, 697–705, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.06.062.
• [12] T. Govindan et al., ‘On the design and performance analysis of wristband MIMO/diversity antenna for smart wearable communication applications’, Sci Rep, vol. 11, (1), 21917, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01326-y.
• [13] A. Lymberis, ‘Smart wearable systems for personalised health management: current R&d; future challenges’, in Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Sep. 2003, Vol.4,.3716-3719 doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2003.1280967.
• [14] T. Suzuki, H. Tanaka, S. Minami, H. Yamada, and T. Miyata, ‘Wearable wireless vital monitoring technology for smart health care’, in 2013 7th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT), Mar. 2013, 1–4. doi: 10.1109/ISMICT.2013.6521687.
• [15] Bluetooth Low Energy’. (accessed Mar. 29, 2023). https://www.nordicsemi.com/Products/Bluetooth-Low-Energy
• [16] nRF52832 - Nordic Semiconductor’. (accessed Mar. 29, 2023).https://www.nordicsemi.com/Products/nRF52832
• [17] nRF5340 - Nordic Semiconductor’. (accessed Mar. 29, 2023).https://www.nordicsemi.com/Products/nRF5340
• [18] M. Sikimić, M. Amović, V. Vujović, B. Suknović, and D. Manjak, ‘An Overview of Wireless Technologies for IoT Network’, in 2020 INFOTEH, Mar. 2020, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/INFOTEH48170.2020.9066337.
• [19] M. B. Mollah, S. Zeadally, and Md. A. K. Azad, ‘Emerging Wireless Technologies for Internet of Things Applications: Opportunities and Challenges’, in Encyclopedia of Wireless Networks, X. Shen, X. Lin, and K. Zhang, 2020, pp. 390–400. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-78262-1_328.
• [20] N. Poursafar, M. E. E. Alahi, and S. Mukhopadhyay, ‘Longrange wireless technologies for IoT applications: A review’, in 2017 Eleventh International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST), Dec. 2017, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICSensT.2017.8304507.
• [21] T. Rault, A. Bouabdallah, and Y. Challal, ‘Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: A top-down survey’, Computer Networks, vol. 67, pp. 104–122, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2014.03.027.
• [22] T. Nguyen Gia et al., ‘Low-cost fog-assisted health-care IoT system with energy-efficient sensor nodes’, in 2017 13th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), Jun. 2017, pp. 1765–1770. doi: 10.1109/IWCMC.2017.7986551.
• [23] A. Y. Wang and C. G. Sodini, ‘On the Energy Efficiency of Wireless Transceivers’, in 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Jun. 2006, pp. 3783–3788. doi: 10.1109/ICC.2006.255661.
• [24] H. Labiod, H. Afifi, and C. D. Santis, Eds., WI-FI TM, BLUETOOTH TM, ZIGBEE TM AND WIMAX TM. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2007. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5397-9.
• [25] General PCB design guidelines for nRF52 series - nRF5 SDK guides - Nordic DevZone’, https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/ guides/short-range-guides/b/hardware-and-layout/posts/ (accessed Apr. 29, 2023).
• [26] Online Power Profiler for Bluetooth LE - opp - Online Power Profiler - Nordic DevZone’. https://devzone.nordicsemi.com (accessed Jun. 29, 2023).
• [27] Nordic Semiconductor Infocenter’. https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com (accessed Apr. 06, 2023)

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15199/48.2023.12.57