Organisation and diversification of the educational market in Poland: The case of the Poznan agglomeration

• Autorzy: Walaszek M. , Bakowska E.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The political changes in Poland after 1989 affected the formation of a self-reliant society. One of the results was the decentralisation of public tasks in the field of education, with the relevant competences transmitted to local governments. Since then, communes have been responsible for ensuring equal access to public education, but at the same time a non-public education market has been developing. Important for changes in the Polish educational system was also a reform started in 1999 which led to the transformation of the two-level system of education existing since 1968 into a three-level structure. The first non-public schools began to form as an alternative to public ones. Currently, non-public schools are mainly run by non-governmental organisations, religious institutions or social associations. In the general opinion, the quality of education in non-public schools is higher than in public ones (smaller classes, better contact between student and teacher, an individual approach to each student). In the face of education-model changes it is important to create a wide range of learning opportunities for everyone. It is also not about competition, but cooperation among all institutions involved in education provision. In this article, the progressive diversification of the educational market is presented on the example of the Poznań agglomeration. A diversified educational system, its commercialisation, and the creation of new educational opportunities for children and young people beyond the basic programme of education are undoubtedly benefits for the Polish society. The growing competition among the wide range of educational institutions (also taking into account institutions organising extra-curricular classes), from a theoretical point of view, should help to improve the quality of education in the entire market of educational services. As a consequence, these trends, together with demographic changes, may invite the question about the prospects of public schools in their present form in the future.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Quaestiones Geographicae
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 35
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.105-114,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Walaszek M.

• Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Dziegielowa 27, 61-680 Poznan, Poland

autor

Bakowska E.

• Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• Centralna Komisja Egzaminacyjna, 2015. O egzaminie gimnazjalnym (On the examination to a lower-secondary school). Online: http://www.cke.edu.pl/index.php/egzamin-gimnazjalny-left/2013-07-27-10-19-18 (accessed 21 February 2015).
• Council of the European Union, 2008. Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 21 November 2008 on preparing young people for the 21st century: An agenda for European cooperation on schools (2008/C 319/09). Online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:319:0020:0022:EN:PDF (accessed 21 February 2015).
• Dolata R., 2005. Najważniejsze wyzwania stojące przed polską oświatą (Major challenges facing Polish education). Instytut Spraw Publicznych, Warszawa: 2-6.
• European Commission, 2014a. Compulsory education in Europe 2014/2015: 5. Online: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/facts_and_figures/compulsory_education_EN.pdf (accessed 21 February 2015).
• European Commission, 2014b. The structure of European educational systems 2014/2015: Schematic diagrams. Online: http://eurydice.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/education_structures_EN.pdf (accessed: 21 February 2015).
• Eurydice, 2012. Kluczowe dane o edukacji w Europie 2012 (Key data on education in Europe). Online: http://eurydice.org.pl/wpcontent/uploads/2012/10/KD_2012_PL.pdf (accessed 22 February 2015).
• Eurydice, 2014. The system of education in Poland. Foundation for the Development of the Educational System. Warsaw.
• Kuźnik F., 2012. Polityka rozwoju i zarządzanie usługami publicznymi w strukturach samorządowych (Development policy and public services management in local government structures). Studia KPZK PAN CXLIII, Warszawa.
• Herbst M. (ed.), 2012. Decentralizacja oświaty (Decentralisation of education). Biblioteczka Oświaty samorządowej, Warszawa.
• Mitch d., 2004. school finance. In: Johnes G., Johnes J. (eds), International Handbook on the Economics of Education. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton.
• OECD, 2010. Impact of the 1999 education reform in Poland. Online: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5kmbjgkm1m9x.pdf?expires=1424547178&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=AD21DFE-80CAC37C18ED2265175BF60A0 (accessed 21 February 2015).
• OECD, 2014a. Education at a glance. Online: http://www.oecd.org/edu/Education-at-a-Glance-2014.pdf (accessed 22 February 2015).
• OECD, 2014b. PISA 2012 results in focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Online: http://ww.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results- overview.pdf (accessed 22 February 2015).
• Przyszczypkowski k., 2010. Polityka oświatowa samorządów (Educational policy of local governments). In: Korolewska M., Osiecka-Chojnacka J. (eds), Polityka oświatowa. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych 2(22), Warszawa: 41-63.
• Sześciło d., 2014. O wątpliwościach wokół powierzania prowadzenia szkół samorządowych. Samorząd Terytorialny 3: 5-13.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/ quageo–2016–0019