Habitat preferences of Caucasian rock agama Paralaudakia caucasia (Sauria: Agamidae) in urban and natural habitats in Northeastern Iran

• Autorzy: Hosseinian Yousefkhani S.S. , Aliabadian M. , Zuffi M.A.L.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this study, we chose 61 plots along three randomly placed transects in urban and natural areas to examine Paralaudakia caucasia habitat preferences. Ten habitat characteristics found to affect the lizard occurrence were recorded in both habitat types. Based on ANOVA, distance to farmland, height of vegetation cover, percentage of cover of human structures, and slope orientation are significantly different between presence and absence plots. Using Principal Component Analysis, we found that the distance to farmland was the main factor predicted species presence in natural habitats. In urban habitats, the percentage of human structures was more important than other factors in predicting P. caucasia presence. The species is more abundant in regions with a low percentage of human-made structures. Other informative factors for species presence were distance from farmland and distance between refuges for urban and natural populations, respectively. Urban populations of P. caucasia appear to prefer areas outside of the city center, far from human structures, whereas natural populations appear to prefer areas away from villages where they may find higher densities of safe refuges. Isolated rocks in both urban and natural areas have an important role in predicting species presence acting because they act as refuges.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

urban habitat; natural habitat; Paralaudakia caucasia; Sauria; Agamidae; habitat preference; environmental factor; human disturbance; Iran

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 66
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.48-56,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Hosseinian Yousefkhani S.S.

• Young Researchers and Elite Club, Islamic Azad University, Shirvan Branch, Shirvan, Iran

autor

Aliabadian M.

• Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
• Research Department of Zoological Innovations (RDZI), Institute of Applied Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

autor

Zuffi M.A.L.

• Museum Natural History, University of Pisa, via Roma 79-I-56011 Calci (Pisa), Italy

Bibliografia

• Ananjeva N. B., Golynsky E. A., Hosseinian Yousefkhani S. S., Masroor R. 2014 — Distribution and environmental suitability of the smallscaled rock agama, Paralaudakiamicrolepis (Sauria: Agamidae) in the Iranian Plateau — Asian Herpetol. Res. 5: 161–167.
• Anderson S. C. 1999 — The lizards of Iran — Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles — Oxford, Ohio 6: 1–442
• Dezfoulian R., Mebert K., Karami M., Kaboli M., Ahmadzadeh F. 2012 — Habitat factors determining the distribution of the Caucasian Agama, Laudakia caucasia, (Squamata: Agamidae) in the Sorkh-e-Hesar National Park, Tehran province, Iran — J. Nat. His. 46: 2735–2747
• Fischer J., Lindenmayer D., Cowling A. 2003 — Habitat models for the four-fingered skink (Carlia tetradactyla) at the microhabitat and landscape scale — Wild. Res. 30:495–504
• Germaine S.S., Wakeling B.F. 2001 — Lizard species distributions and habitat occupation along an urban gradient in Tucson, Arizona, USA — Biol. Cons. 97: 229–237.
• Grover M. C. 1996 — Microhabitat use and thermal ecology of two narrowly sympatric Sceloporus(Phrynosomatidae) lizards — J. Herpetol. 30: 152–160.
• Guisan A., Zimmermann N.E. 2000 — Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology — Ecol. Model. 135: 147–186.
• Hines J. E. 2006 — PRESENCE — Software to estimate patch occupancy and related parameters — USGS-PWRC. http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/software/presence.html.
• Hosseinian Yousefkhani S.S., Ficetola G.F., Rastegar-Pouyani N., Ananjeva N.B., Rastegar-Pouyani E., Masroor R. 2013 — Environmental suitability and distribution of the Caucasian Rock Agama, Paralaudakiacaucasia (Sauria: Agamidae) in western and central Asia — Asian Herpetol. Res. 4: 207–213.
• Huey R.B., Pianka E.R. 1981 — Ecological consequences of foraging mode — Ecology, 62: 991–999.
• IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0.0 Copyright IBM Corporation 1989, 2011. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLVMB_20.0.0/com.ihm.spss.statistics_20.kc.doc/pv_welcome.html
• Indermaur L., Winzeler T., Schmidt B.R., Tockner K., Schaub M. 2009 — Differential resource selection within shared habitat types across spatial scales in sympatric toads — Ecology, 90: 3430–3444.
• Jones J. 2001 — Habitat selection studies in avian ecology: a critical review — The Auk, 118: 557–562
• Kearney M. 2002 — Hot rocks and much-toohot rocks: seasonal patterns of retreat-site selection by a nocturnal ectotherm — J. Therm. Biol. 27: 205–218.
• Ljubisavljević K., Polović L., Iković V., Vuksanović S., Vukov T. 2017 — Habitat use of endemic Balkan rock lizards (Dinarolacerta spp.) — Salamadra, 53: 279– 284.
• Loos J., Dayan T., Drescher N., Levanony T., Maza E., Shacham B., Talbi R., Assmann T. 2011 — Habitat preferences of the Levant Green Lizard, Lacerta media israelica (Peters, 1964) — Zool. Mid. East. 52: 17–28.
• Lovich J.E., Bainbridge D. 1999 — Anthropogenic degradation of the southern California desert ecosystem and prospects for natural recovery and restoration — Environ. Manag. 24: 309–326.
• MacKenzie D.I., Nichols J.D., Hines J.E., Knutson M.G., Franklin A.B. 2003 — Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly — Ecology, 84: 2200–2207.
• MacKenzie D.I., Nichols J.D., Lachman G.B., Droege S., Andrew R.J., Langtimm C.A. 2002 — Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one — Ecology, 83: 2248–2255.
• Mazerolle M.J., Bailey L.L., Kendall W.L., Andrew R.J., Converse S.J., Nichols J.D. 2007 — Making great leaps forward: accounting for detectability in herpetological field studies — J. Herpetol. 41: 672–689.
• Morris D.W. 2003 — Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection — Oecologia, 136: 1–13.
• Nemes S., Vogrin M., Hartel T., Ollerer K. 2006 — Habitat selection at the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis): ontogenetic shifts — North-West. J. Zool. 2: 17–26.
• Norfolk O., Melotte A., Gilbert F., Zalat S., Reader T. 2010 — A comparative study of two agamid lizards, Laudakia stellio and Pseudotrapelus sinaitus, in southern Sinai — Egypt. J. Biol. 12: 27–43.
• Price-Rees S.J., Brown G.P., Shine R. 2013 — Habitat selection by bluetongue lizards (Tiliqua, Scincidae) in tropical Australia: a study using GPS telemetry — Anim. Biotel. 1: 1–14.
• Rastegar-Pouyani N., Johari M., Rastegar-Pouyani E. 2007 — Field Guide to the Reptiles of Iran — Razi University Press, Kermanshah, Iran.
• Roberts A.A. 2007 — Habitat preferences of the eastern fence lizard, Sceloporus undulatus, in southwestern Virginia — Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
• Rosenzweig M.L. 1991 — Habitat selection and population interactions: the search for mechanism — American Naturalist, Chicago; S5–S28
• Vitt L.J., Caldwell J.P. 2013 — Herpetology: an introductory biology of amphibians and reptiles — Academic Press, London.
• Williams S.C., McBrayer L.D. 2007 — Selection of microhabitat by the introduced Mediterranean gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus: influence of ambient light and distance to refuge — Southwest. Natural. 52: 578–585.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.3161/15052249PJE2018.66.1.005