Znaczenie dzików w szerzeniu się afrykańskiego pomoru świń ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem Europy

• Autorzy: Truszczynski M. , Pejsak Z.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Importance of wild boar in the spread of African Swine Fever, particularly in relation to Europe

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

After a short characterisation of the biology and behaviour of wild boar the role of this species (Sus scrofa) in the spread of African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) and ASF epidemiology was characterized in relation to the introduction of this virus to the Russian Federation, starting in 2007 and to the Ukraine in 2012. It has to be underlined that the primary source of infection of the wild boar is the pig (Sus domestica) and particularly the contaminated swill from domestic slaughter removed to the environment. However infected wild boar can transmit the ASFV secondarily to domestic pigs. This was proved by the transmission by the wild boar to domestic swine of ASFV in Lithuania in 2013 and Poland in the beginning 2014. The definition of endemic focuses of ASFV infection is given in this paper, indicating a year round transmission cycle through spring to the next generation. It is indicated that a considerable number of administrative units in the Russian Federation are either endemic or on the way to becoming endemic. This is particularly the case in connection with the high wild boar densities. Since such high densities of wild boar are also found in other parts of Europe, going to the West and South from the Russian Federation, there is a growing possibility of the transfer of ASFV to these parts of Europe. Since wild boar may transfer this infection, procedures how to restrict the number of wild boar in this territory are also discussed in this article. It is stated that neither by hunting or trapping the density of wild boar populations can be drastically reduced. Fencing can restrict wild boar movement, however further knowledge of the ASF epidemiology and spatial distribution of wild boar are required to identify the area were fencing could be used. Taking the above mentioned difficulties into account the most effective procedure to prevent wild boar from the infection by the ASFV is to contract its transmission from domestic swine to wild boar and into areas where the ASFV is not existing, from areas where infected wild boar are present.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Europa; choroby zwierzat; afrykanski pomor swin; wystepowanie; rozprzestrzenianie sie chorob; wirus afrykanskiego pomoru swin; rozprzestrzenianie sie wirusow; zwierzeta dziko zyjace; dziki; znaczenie; zwalczanie chorob zwierzat; profilaktyka; zwierzeta zakazone; odstrzal zwierzat

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 71
• Numer: 02
• Opis fizyczny: s.71-74,rys.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Truszczynski M.

• Zakład Chorób Świń, Państwowy Instytut Weterynaryjny - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy w Puławach, Al.Partyzantów 57, 24-100 Puławy

autor

Pejsak Z.

• Zakład Chorób Świń, Państwowy Instytut Weterynaryjny - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy w Puławach, Al.Partyzantów 57, 24-100 Puławy

Bibliografia

• 1. Barrios-Garcia M. N., Ballari S. A.: Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biol. Invasions 2012, 14, 2283-2300.
• 2. Beltrán-Alcrudo D., Guberti V., de Simone L., De Castro J., Rozstalnyy A., Dietze K., Wainwright S., Slingenbergh J.: African swine fever spread in theRussian Federation and the risk for the region. Empres Watch, Rome, FAO2009, 1-9 (available at ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/012/ak718e/ak718e00.pdf).
• 3. Braga C., Alexandre N., Fernandez-Llario P., Santos P.: Wild boar (Sus scrofa) harvesting using the espera hunting method: side effects and managementimplications. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2010, 56, 465-469.
• 4. Calenge C., Maillard D., Fournier P., Fouque C.: Efficiency of spreading maize in the garrigues to reduce wild boar (Sus scrofa) damage to Mediterraneanvineyards. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2004, 50, 112-120.
• 5. Dardaillon M.: Seasonal variations in habitat selection and spatial distribution of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Camargue, Southern France. Behav. Processes1986, 13, 251-268.
• 6. Dardaillon M.: Wild boar social groupings and their seasonal changes in the Camargue, Southern France. Z. Säugetierkunde 1988, 53, 22-30.
• 7. Dardaillon M., Teillaud P.: Éthogramme du sanglier adulte et du marcassin (Sus scrofa L.). Monitore Zool. Ital. (N.S.) 1987, 21, 41-68.
• 8. Delcroix I., Signoret J. P., Mauget R.: L’élevage en commun des jeunes Au sein du groupe social chez le sanglier. Journées recherche porcine enFrance 1985, 17, 167-174.
• 9. Dietze K., Beltrán-Alcrudo D., Khomenko S., Seck B., Pinto J., Diallo A., Lamien C., Lubroth J., Martin V.: African Swine Fever (ASF) Recent developments– timely updates. Focus on No. 6. Rome, FAO, 2012 (available athttp://www.fao.org/docrep/016/ap372e/ap372e.pdf).
• 10. European Food Safety Authority: Scientific Report of EFSA. Evaluation of possible mitigation measures to prevent introduction and spread of Africanswine fever virus through wild boar. EFSA Journal 2014, 12 (3), 3616, 1-23.
• 11. Gamelon M., Douhard M., Baubet E., Gimenez O., Brandt S., Gaillard J.-M.: Fluctuating food resources influence developmental plasticity in wild boar.Biol. Lett. 2013, 9, 20130419 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0419).
• 12. Gamelon M., Gaillard J.-M., Baubet E., Devillard S., Say L., Brandt S., Gimenez O.: The relationship between phenotypic variation among offspringand mother body mass in wild boar: evidence of coin-flipping? J. Anim. Ecol.2013, 82, 937-944.
• 13. Geisser H., Reyer H. U.: Efficacy of hunting, feeding, and fencing to reduce crop damage by wild boars. J. Wildl. Management 2004, 68, 939-946.
• 14. Geisser H., Reyer H. U.: The influence of food and temperature on population density of wild boar Sus scrofa in the Thurgau (Switzerland). J. Zool. 2005,267, 89-96.
• 15. Gethöeffer F., Sodeikat G., Pohlmeyer K.: Reproductive parameters of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in three different parts of Germany. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2007,53, 287-297.
• 16. Groot Bruinderink G. W. T. A., Hazebroek E., Van Der Voot H.: Diet and condition of wild boar, Sus scrofa, without supplementary feeding. J. Zool.(London) 1994, 233, 631-648.
• 17. Gundlach V. H.: Brutfürsorge, Brutpflege, Verhaltensontogenese und Tagesperiodik beim Europäischen Wildschwein (Sus strofa L.). Zeitschriftfür Tierpsychologie, Paul Parey, Hamburg 1968, 25, 955-995.
• 18. Janeau G., Spitz F.: Léspace chez le sanglier (Sus scrofa L.) occupation et mode dútilisation. Gibier Faune Sauvage 1984, 1, 73-89.
• 19. Keuling O., Baubet E., Duscher A., Ebert C., Fischer C., Monaco A., Podgorski T., Prevot C., Ronnenberg K., Sodeikat G., Stier N., Thurfjell H.:Mortality rates of wild boar Sus scrofa L. in central Europe. Eur. J. Wildl.Res. 2013, 59, 805-814.
• 20. Khomenko S., Beltrán-Alcrudo D., Rozstalnyy A., Gogin A., Kolbasov D., Pinto J., Lubroth J., Martin V.: African swine fever in the Russian Federation:risk factors for Europe and beyond. Empres Watch, Rome, FAO 2013, 28,1-13.
• 21. Long J. L.: Introduced mammals of the world: their history distribution and influence. Collingwood, Australia: CSIRO Publishing and Wallingford UK: CABI Publishing 2003, s. 589.
• 22. Massei G., Genov P. V.: The environmental impact of wild boar. Galemys 2004, 16, 135-145.
• 23. Massei G., Roy S., Bunting R.: Too many hogs? A review of methods to mitigate impact by wild boar and feral hogs. Human-Wildlife Interactions 2011,5, 79-99.
• 24. Pejsak Z., Truszczyński M., Kozak E., Markowska-Daniel I.: Analiza epidemiologiczna dwóch pierwszych przypadków afrykańskiego pomoru świńu dzików w Polsce. Med. Weter. 2014, 70 (6), 369-372.
• 25. Putman R., Apollonio M., Andersen R. (eds.): Ungulate management in Europe: problems and practices. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2011, s. 410(available at http://books.google.bg/books?id=02zA9-jJT8wC&hl=cs&sitesec=reviews).
• 26. Sánchez-Vizcaíno J. M., Neira M. A.: African Swine Fever Virus, [w:] Zimmerman J., Karriker L., Ramírez A., Shwartz K., Stevenson G. (eds.):Diseases of Swine. 10th Edition. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Ames, Iowa2012, s. 396-404.
• 27. Sodeikat G., Pohlmeyer K.: Escape movements of family groups of wild boar Sus scrofa influenced by drive hunts in Lower Saxony, Germany. Wildl. Biol.2003, 9, 43-49.
• 28. Sweitzer R. A., Van Vuren D., Gardner I. A., Boyce W. M., Waithman J. D.: Estimating sizes of wild pig populations in the North and Central Coast regionsof California. J. Wildl. Management 2000, 64, 531-543.
• 29. Teillaud P.: Strategies alimentaires et statut social chez le sanglier en captivite. Behav. Processes 1986, 12, 327-347.
• 30. Thurfjell H., Spong G., Ericsson G.: Effects of hunting on wild boar Sus scrofa behaviour. Wildl. Biol. 2013, 19, 87-93.