Prey selection by Myotis myotis (Vespertilionidae) in a Mediterranean region

• Autorzy: Pereira M.J.R. , Rebelo H. , Rainho A. , Palmeirim J. M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Seasonal variations in the diet composition and prey selection by Myotis myotis were studied in a Mediterranean region dominated by open stone oak woodlands, olive groves, and cereal steppes. The diet and food abundance were determined by faecal analysis and pitfall trapping, respectively. Overall, the diet (expressed as % frequency) was dominated by carabid beetles (Carabidae, 52%), crickets (Gryllidae, 43%), and spiders (Arachnida, 34%). Food was far more abundant in the spring than in the summer and autumn. The dietary composition varied significantly throughout the year. In the spring, it was dominated by carabids and crickets, and in the summer by spiders. These were then replaced by carabids, which became the most frequently eaten prey in autumn. The spring-summer switch to spiders coincided with a marked drop in food abundance. Some of the temporal variations in bats’ diet can be explained by parallel changes in prey abundance. In comparison to central European populations, our Mediterranean colony of M. myotis consumed much more crickets and spiders, which was balanced with a lower use of carabid beetles. Prey selection was tested using logistic regression models. The results suggest that, although carabids are the most consumed, crickets are preferred. Spiders seem to represent mostly a complement preyed upon at times of lower food abundance. It is not clear if the preference for crickets is simply due to their great conspicuousness, or to the choice based on energetic rewards or taste. Overall, our results are consistent with the predictions of the optimal foraging theory.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Chiropterologica
• Rocznik: 2002
• Tom: 04
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: 183-193,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Pereira M.J.R.

• Instituto da Conservacao da Natureza, Rua Filipe Folque, n.46,1, 1050-114 Lisboa, Portugal

autor

Rebelo H.

autor

Rainho A.

autor

Palmeirim J. M.

Bibliografia

• Anderson, M. E., and P. A. Racey. 1993. Discrimination between fluttering and non-fluttering moths by brown long-eared bats, Plecotus auritus. Animal Behaviour, 46: 1151-1155.
• Arlettaz, R. 1995. Ecology of the sibling mouseeared bats (Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii): zoogeography, niche, competition, and foraging. Horus Publishers Martigny, Valais, 208 pp.
• Arlettaz, R. 1996. Feeding behaviour and foraging strategy of free-living mouse-eared bats, Myotismyotis and Myotis blythii. Animal Behaviour, 51: 1-11.
• Arlettaz, R., and N. Perrin. 1995. The trophic niches of sympatric sibling Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii: do mouse-eared bats select prey? Pp. 361-376, in Ecology, evolution and behaviour of bats (P. A. Racey and S. M. Swift, eds.). Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 67. Clarendon Press, Oxford, xxii + 421 pp.
• Arlettaz, R., N. Perrin, and J. Hausser. 1997. Trophic resource partitioning and competition between the two sibling bat species Myotis myotis and Myotis blythi (Chiroptera, Ve- spertilionidae). Journal of Animal Ecology, 66: 897-911.
• Arlettaz, R., S. Godat, and H. Meyer. 2000. Competition for food by expanding pipistrelle bat populations (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) might contribute to the decline of lesser horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus hipposideros). Biological Conservation, 93: 55-60.
• Arlettaz, R., G. Jones, and P. A. Racey. 2001. Effect of acoustic clutter on prey detection by bats. Nature, 414: 742-745.
• Baez, M. 1988. Diptera. Pp. 503-520, in Bases para un curso practico de entomologfa (J. A. Barrientos, ed.). Asociacion Espanola de Entomol- ogi'a, Salamanca, xii + 754 pp.
• Barclay, R. M. R. 1985. Long- versus short-range foraging strategies of hoary (Lasiurus cinereus) and silver-haired (Lasionycteris noctivagans) bats and the consequences for prey selection. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 63: 2507-2515.
• Barclay, R. M. R., and R. M. Brigham. 1994. Constraints on optimal foraging: a field test of prey discrimination by echolocating insectivorous bats. Animal Behaviour, 48: 1013-1021.
• Barrientos, J. 1988. Araneae. Pp. 115-142, in Bases para un curso practico de entomologfa (J. A. Barrientos, ed.). Asociacion Espanola de Entomologfa, Salamanca, xii + 754 pp.
• Bauerova, Z. 1978. Contribution to the trophic ecology of Myotis myotis. Folia Zoologica, 27: 305-316.
• Belwood, J. J., and G. K. Morris. 1987. Bat predation and its influence on calling behaviour in Neotropical katydids. Science, 238: 64-67.
• Brack, V., Jr., and J. O. Whitaker, Jr. 2001. Foods of the northern myotis, Myotis septentrionalis, from Missouri and Indiana, with notes on foraging. Acta Chiropterologica, 3: 203-210.
• Chinery, M. 1986. Insects of Britain & Western Europe. HarperCollins Publishers, London, 320 pp.
• Dickman, C. R., and C. Huang. 1988. The reliability of faecal analysis as a method for determining the diet of insectivorous mammals. Journal of Mammalogy,69: 108-113.
• Faure, P. A., and R. M. R. Barclay. 1992. The sensory basis of prey selection by the long-eared bat, Myotis evotis, and the consequences for prey selection. Animal Behaviour, 44: 31-39.
• Freeman, P. W. 1981. Correspondence of food habits and morphology in insectivorous bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 62: 166-173.
• Garcia, M. D., M. E. Clemente, and J. J. Presa. 1988. Orthoptera. Pp. 383-394, in Bases para un curso practico de entomologfa (J. A. Barrientos, ed.). Asociacion Espanola de Entomologfa, Salamanca, xii + 754 pp.
• Gayubo, S. F. 1988. Hymenoptera. Pp. 641-660, in Bases para un curso practico de entomologfa (J. A. Barrientos, ed.). Asociacion Espanola de Entomologfa, Salamanca, xii + 754 pp.
• Graf, M., H. P. B. Stutz, and V. Ziswiler. 1992. Regionale und saisonale Unterschiede in der Na- hrungzusammensetzung des GroBen Mausohrs Myotis myotis (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in der Schweiz. Zeitschrift fiir Saugetierkunde, 57: 193-200.
• Hosmer, D. W., and S. Lemeshow. 2000. Applied logistic regression. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, xii + 373 pp.
• Hutson, A. M., S. P. Mickleburgh, and P. A. Racey. (comp.). 2001. Microchiropteran bats: global status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Chiroptera Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, x + 258 pp.
• Ihaka, R., and R. Gentleman. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5: 299-314.
• Krebs, C. J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. HarperCollins Publishers, New York, xii + 654 pp.
• Kunz, T. H. 1988. Methods of assessing the availability of prey to insectivorous bats. Pp. 191-210, in Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats (T. H. Kunz, ed.). Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, D.C., xxii + 533 pp.
• Kunz, T. H., and J. O. Whitaker, Jr. 1983. An evaluation of faecal analysis for determining food habits of insectivorous bats. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 61: 1317-1321.
• Lang, A., J. Filser, and J. R. Henschel. 1999. Predation by ground beetles and wolf spiders on herbivorous insects in a maize crop. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 72: 189-199.
• McAney, C. M, C. B. Shiel, C. Sullivan, and J. S. Fairley. 1991. The analysis of bat droppings. Occasional Publication, The Mammal Society, London, 14: 1-^18.
• Meglitsch, P. A., and F. R. Schram. 1991.Invertebrate zoology. 3rd edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, ix + 623 pp.
• Neuweiler, G. 1989. Foraging ecology and audition in echolocating bats. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 4: 160-166.
• Palmeirim, J. M. 1990. Bats from Portugal: zoogeography and systematics. Miscellaneous Publications, Kansas University Museum of Natural History, 82: 1-53.
• Pont, B., and J. Moulin. 1985. Etude du regime alimentaire de Myotis myotis. Methodologie — premiers resultats. Pp. 23-33, in Actes du 9° colloque francophone de mammalogie, les chiropteres. Societe Frainjaise pour 1'Etude et la Protection des Mammiferes, Rouen.
• Pyke, G. H., H. R. Pulliam, and E. L. Charnov. 1977. Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 52: 137-154.
• Quartau, J. A., and E. Luna de Carvalho. 1998. Contribuifao para o rnelhor conhecimento dos in- sectos em Portugal: chaves para a determinaqao das ordens. Publicagoes Avulsas 2a serie 5, Mu- seu Bocage, Lisboa, 23 pp.
• Roberts, M. J. 1995. Spiders of Britain & Northern Europe. HarperCollins Publishers, London, 383 pp.
• Salgado, J. M., R. Outerello, P. Gamarra, M. Blas, X. Vazquez, E. Vives, and J. C. Otero. 1988.Coleoptera. Pp. 573-640, in Bases para un curso practico de entomologla (J. A. Barrientos ed.). Asociacion Espanola de Entomologla, Salamanca, xii + 754 pp.
• Schoener, T. W. 1971. Theory of feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11: 369^104.
• Shiel, C. B., P. L. Duverge, P. Smiddy, and J. S. Fairley. 1998. Analysis of the diet of Leisler’s bat (Nyctalus leisleri) in Ireland with some comparative analyses from England and Germany. Journal of Zoology (London), 246: 417^125.
• Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rolhf. 1995. Biometry. 3rd edition. Freeman and Company, New York, 859 pp.
• Swift, S., P. A. Racey, and M. I. Avery. 1985. Feeding ecology of Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Chi- roptera: Vespertilionidae) during pregnancy and lactation. II. Diet. Journal of Animal Ecology, 54: 217-225.
• Vaughan, N. 1997. The diets of British bats (Chiro- ptera). Mammal Review, 27: 77-94.
• Whitaker, J. O., Jr. 1988. Food habits analysis of insectivorous bats. Pp. 171-190, in Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats (T. H. Kunz, ed.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., xxii + 533 pp.
• Whitaker, J. O., Jr., and B. Lawhead. 1992. Foods of Myotis lucifugus in a maternity colony in central Alaska. Journal of Mammalogy, 73: 646-648.

Uwagi

rekord w opracowaniu