A morphometric study of the sella turcica: race, age, and gender effect

• Autorzy: Muhammed F.K. , Abdullah A.O. , Liu Y.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the morphological appearance, bridging incidence, and linear dimensions of sella turcica (ST) in Chinese and Nepalese individuals. Materials and methods: This retrospective study examined digital standardised lateral cephalometric of 360 Chinese and Nepalese subjects, which consisted of 116 females and 64 males with an age range of 8–28 years. The sella morphology, bridging, and size were assessed on the lateral cephalometric radiographs, and the data were correlated with race, gender, and age. Results: Sella turcica presented a normal morphology in most Nepalese (90%) subjects whereas flat-shaped morphology were highly prevalent among Chinese subjects (36.7%). The frequency of full bridging was 2.8% and 11.7% for Chinese and Nepalese subjects, respectively. When the race was compared with sella size, a statistically significant difference was detected in length (p < 0.05) and diameter (p < 0.001) of ST. A significant correlation was found between length and diameter of the ST and age in Chinese and Nepalese subjects. No significant correlation was observed between the size of ST and gender of Chinese and Nepalese subjects. The only parameter significantly associated with race, age and gender was the diameter of ST. Conclusions: These findings assist orthodontists, neurosurgeons, and forensic medical investigators to focus on the diameter of ST during orthodontic treatment planning, diagnosis of pathology of the pituitary gland, and age determination. (Folia Morphol 2020; 79, 2: 318–326)

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Morphologica
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 79
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.318-326,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Muhammed F.K.

• Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Shenyang, P.R. China

autor

Abdullah A.O.

• School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Shenyang, P.R. China

autor

Liu Y.

• Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Shenyang, P.R. China

Bibliografia

• 1. Alkofide EA. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III Saudi subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2007; 29(5): 457–463, doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm049, indexed in Pubmed: 17693429.
• 2. Andredaki M, Koumantanou A, Dorotheou D, et al. A cephalometric morphometric study of the sella turcica. Eur J Orthod. 2007; 29(5): 449–456, doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm048, indexed in Pubmed: 17974535.
• 3. Axelsson S, Storhaug K, Kjaer I. Post-natal size and morphology of the sella turcica. Longitudinal cephalometric standards for Norwegians between 6 and 21 years of age. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26(6): 597–604, doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.6.597, indexed in Pubmed: 15650069.
• 4. Axelsson S, Storhaug K, Kjaer I. Post-natal size and morphology of the sella turcica in Williams syndrome. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26(6): 613–621, doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.6.613, indexed in Pubmed: 15650071.
• 5. Becktor JP, Einersen S, Kjaer I. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with severe craniofacial deviations. Eur J Orthod. 2000; 22(1): 69–74, doi: 10.1093/ejo/22.1.69, indexed in Pubmed: 10721247.
• 6. Björk A. Cranial base development. Am J Orthod. 1955; 41(3): 198–225, doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(55)90005-1.
• 7. Cederberg RA, Benson BW, Nunn M, et al. Calcification of the interclinoid and petroclinoid ligaments of sella turcica: a radiographic study of the prevalence. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003; 6(4): 227–232, doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.00243.x, indexed in Pubmed: 14606526.
• 8. Chang ZC, Hu FC, Lai E, et al. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140(6): e289–e297, doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.024, indexed in Pubmed: 22133963.
• 9. Damstra J, Huddleston Slater JJR, Fourie Z, et al. Reliability and the smallest detectable differences of lateral cephalometric measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138(5): 546.e1–8; discussion 546, doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.05.013, indexed in Pubmed: 21055590.
• 10. Hasan H, Alam M, Yusof A, et al. Size and morphology of sella turcica in malay populations: a 3D CT study. J Hard Tissue Biol. 2016; 25(3): 313–320, doi: 10.2485/jhtb.25.313.
• 11. Hasan H, Alam M, Abdullah Y, et al. 3DCT morphometric analysis of sella turcica in iraqi population. J Hard Tissue Biol. 2016; 25(3): 227–232, doi: 10.2485/jhtb.25.227.
• 12. Islam M, Alam M, Yusof A, et al. 3D CT study of morphological shape and size of sella turcica in bangladeshi population. J Hard Tissue Biol. 2017; 26(1): 1–6, doi: 10.2485/jhtb.26.1.
• 13. Jones RM, Faqir A, Millett DT. Bridging and dimensions of sella turcica in subjects treated by surgical-orthodontic means or orthodontics only. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75(5): 714–718, doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[714:BADOST]2.0.CO;2.
• 14. Kantor M, Norton L. Normal radiographic anatomy and common anomalies seen in cephalometric films. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped. 1987; 91(5): 414–426, doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90394-5.
• 15. Kjaer I, Becktor KB, Lisson J, et al. Face, palate, and craniofacial morphology in patients with a solitary median maxillary central incisor. Eur J Orthod. 2001; 23(1): 63–73, doi: 10.1093/ejo/23.1.63, indexed in Pubmed: 11296511.
• 16. Kjaer I, Fischer Hansen B, Reintoft I, et al. Pituitary gland and axial skeletal malformations in human fetuses with spina bifida. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1999; 9(6): 354–358, doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1072282, indexed in Pubmed: 10661842.
• 17. Kjaer I, Wagner A, Madsen P, et al. The sella turcica in children with lumbosacral myelomeningocele. Eur J Orthod. 1998; 20(4): 443–448, doi: 10.1093/ejo/20.4.443, indexed in Pubmed: 9753826.
• 18. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2): 155–163, doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012, indexed in Pubmed: 27330520.
• 19. Lee HS, Kim SH, Kim SO, et al. A new type of dental anomaly: molar-incisor malformation (MIM). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014; 118(1): 101–109. e3, doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.03.014, indexed in Pubmed: 24908600.
• 20. Leonardi R, Barbato E, Vichi M, et al. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with dental anomalies. Eur J Orthod. 2006; 28(6): 580–585, doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjl032, indexed in Pubmed: 16954179.
• 21. MacLeod SP, Macintyre DR. Bilateral hypoplasia of mandibular condyles in Hurler’s syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993; 75(5): 659–660, doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(93)90244-x, indexed in Pubmed: 8488036.
• 22. Magat G, Ozcan Sener S. Morphometric analysis of the sella turcica in Turkish individuals with different dentofacial skeletal patterns. Folia Morphol. 2018; 77(3): 543–550, doi: 10.5603/FM.a2018.0022, indexed in Pubmed: 29500897.
• 23. Meyer-Marcotty P, Weisschuh N, Dressler P, et al. Morphology of the sella turcica in Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome with PITX2 mutation. J Oral Pathol Med. 2008; 37(8): 504–510, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2008.00650.x, indexed in Pubmed: 18331556.
• 24. Muhammed FK, Abdullah AO, Rashid ZJ, et al. Morphology, incidence of bridging, and dimensions of sella turcica in different racial groups. Oral Radiol. 2019; 35(2): 127–134, doi: 10.1007/s11282-018-0328-x, indexed in Pubmed: 30484186.
• 25. Norton N. Netter’s head and neck anatomy for dentistry. 2nd ed. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia 2011.
• 26. Papagrigorakis MJ, Karamesinis KG, Daliouris KP, et al. Paleopathological findings in radiographs of ancient and modern Greek skulls. Skeletal Radiol. 2012; 41(12): 1605–1611, doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1432-3, indexed in Pubmed: 22609968.
• 27. Peker T, Anil A, Gülekon N, et al. The incidence and types of sella and sphenopetrous bridges. Neurosurg Rev. 2006; 29(3): 219–223, doi: 10.1007/s10143-006-0018-8, indexed in Pubmed: 16528575.
• 28. Pérez I, Chávez A, Ponce D. Frequency of sella turcica bridge and clinoid enlargement in lateral cephalometric plain film radiography from peruvians. Int J Morphol. 2013; 31(2): 373–377, doi: 10.4067/s0717-95022013000200002.
• 29. Pisaneschi M, Kapoor G. Imaging the sella and parasellar region. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2005; 15(1): 203–219, doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2005.02.007, indexed in Pubmed: 15927868.
• 30. Ruiz C, Wafae N, Wafae G. Sella turcica morphometry using computed tomography. Eur J Anat. 2008; 12: 47–50.
• 31. Silverman F. Roentgen standards for size of the pituitary fossa from infancy through adolescence. Am J Roentgenol. 1957; 78(3): 45–60, indexed in Pubmed: 13458563.
• 32. Sugata T, Myoken Y, Tanaka S. Acromegaly identified in a patient with a complaint of malocclusion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998; 85(1): 44–46, doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90396-1, indexed in Pubmed: 9474613.
• 33. Tekiner H, Acer N, Kelestimur F. Sella turcica: an anatomical, endocrinological, and historical perspective. Pituitary. 2015; 18(4): 575–578, doi: 10.1007/s11102-014-0609-2, indexed in Pubmed: 25307180.
• 34. Valizadeh S, Shahbeig S, Mohseni S, et al. Correlation of shape and size of sella turcica with the type of facial skeletal class in an iranian group. Iran J Radiol. 2015; 12(3): e16059, doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.12(3)2015.16059, indexed in Pubmed: 26557271.
• 35. Yáñez-Vico RM, Rodríguez-Caballero A, Iglesias-Linares A, et al. Craniofacial characteristics in cri-du-chat syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 110(6): e38–e44, doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.08.021, indexed in Pubmed: 21112524.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2019.0092