Urban geography evolving: toward an evolutionary urban geography

• Autorzy: Weaver C.R.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Quaestiones Geographicae
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 33
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.7-18,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Weaver C.R.

• Department of Environmental Studies, MS GIS Program, University of Redlands, Redlands, CA, USA

Bibliografia

• Allen P., 1997. Cities and regions as self-organizing systems. Taylor, Francis, New York.
• Batty M., Xie Y., 1999. Self-organized criticality and urban development. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 3: 109-124.
• Boschma R.A., Frenken K., 2006. Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 6: 273-302.
• Bourne L., 1981. The geography of housing. V.H. Winston & Sons, Toronto.
• Bowles S., 2006. Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine ‘the moral sentiments’: Evidence from economic experiments. Science 320: 1605-1609. [Web of Science]
• Brueckner J., Helsley R., 2011. Sprawl and blight. Journal of Urban Economics 69(2): 205-213. [Web of Science] [CrossRef]
• Dawkins R., 2003. Introduction. In: Darwin C., The origin of species and the Voyage of the Beagle: with an introduction by Richard Dawkins. Everyman’s Library/Random House, New York: ix-xxx.
• Dunbar R.I.M., 2007. Evolution and the social sciences. History of the Human Sciences 20(2): 29-50. [CrossRef] [Web of Science]
• Essletzbichler J., Rigby D.L., 2007. Exploring evolutionary economic geographies. Journal of Economic Geography 7: 549-571. [CrossRef]
• Galster G.C., Cutsinger J.M., Malega R., 2006. The social costs of concentrated poverty: Externalities to neighbouring households and property owners and the dynamics of decline. National Poverty Centre Working Paper Series #06-42.
• Ghitter G., Smart A., 2009. Mad cows, regional governance, and urban sprawl: Path dependence and unintended consequences in the Calgary region. Urban Affairs Review 44(5): 617-644. [Web of Science]
• Gintis H., Bowles S., Boyd R., Fehr E. (eds), 2005. Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life. MIT Press, Cambridge.
• Glaeser E.L., Gyourko J., 2005. Urban decline and durable housing. Journal of Political Economy 113(2): 345-375. [CrossRef]
• Grigsby W.G., Baratz M., Maclellan D., 1987. The dynamics of neighbourhood change and decline. Pergamon, Oxford.
• Hardin G., 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 1(3): 243-253.
• Harvey D., 1976. Class structure in a capitalist society and the theory of residential differentiation. In: Peel R., Chisholm M., Haggett P. (eds), Processes in physical and human geography. Heinemann, London: 354-383.
• Heinrich J., et al. (eds), 2004. Foundations of human sociality. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Hodgson G.M., Knudsen T., 2010. Darwin’s conjecture: The search for general principles of social & economic evolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Hoyt H., 1939. The structure and growth of residential neighbourhoods in American cities. Federal Housing Administration, Washington, DC.
• Jeffrey P., 1996. Evolutionary analogies and sustainability. Futures 28(2): 173-187. [CrossRef]
• Krumm R., Vaughan R.J., 1976. The economics of urban blight. RAND Washington, DC.
• Lewontin R.C., 1970. The units of selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1-18. [CrossRef]
• Lloyd E., Wilson D.S., Sober E., 2011. Evolutionary mismatch and what to do about it: A basic tutorial. The Evolution Institute, Wesley Chapel, FL.
• Lustick I.S., 2011. Taking evolution seriously: Historical institutionalism and evolutionary theory. Polity 43(2): 179-209. [Web of Science] [CrossRef]
• Mayr E., 2001. What evolution is. Basic Books, New York.
• Megbolugbe I.F., Hoek-Smit M.C., Linneman P.D., 1996. Understanding neighbourhood dynamics: A review of the contributions of William G. Grigsby. Urban Studies 33(10): 1779-1795. [CrossRef]
• Okasha S., 2006. Evolution and the levels of selection. Clarendon, Oxford.
• Pacione M., 2003. Quality-of-life research in urban geography. Urban Geography 24: 314-339. [CrossRef]
• Pitkin W., 2001. Theories of neighborhood change: Implications for community development policy and practice. UCLA Advanced Policy Institute, Los Angeles.
• Pumain D., 1998. Urban research and complexity. In: Bertuglia C.S., Bianchi G., Mela A. (eds), The city and its sciences. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg: 323-361.
• Ross C.E., Mirowsky J., 1999. Disorder and decay: The concept and measurement of perceived neighbourhood disorder. Urban Affairs Review 34: 412-432. [CrossRef]
• Shlay A., Whitman, G. 2006. Research for democracy: Linking community organizing and research to leverage blight policy. City & Community 5(2): 153-171.
• Skogan W., 1986. Fear of crime and neighbourhood change. Crime and Justice 8: 203-229. [CrossRef]
• Somerville P., van Beckhoven E., van Kempen R., 2009. The decline and rise of neighbourhoods: The importance of neighbourhood governance. European Journal of Housing Policy 9(1): 25-44.
• Torrens P.M., 2006. Simulating sprawl. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96(2): 248-275. [CrossRef]
• Van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Gowdy J.M., 2009. A group selection perspective on economic behaviour, institutions, and organization. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 72: 1-20. [Web of Science]
• Vitale A.S., 2008. City of disorder: How the quality of life campaign transformed New York politics. New York University Press, New York.
• Wagenaar H., 2007. Governance, complexity, and democratic participation: How citizens and public officials harness the complexities of neighbourhood decline. The American Review of Public Administration 37(1): 17-50. [CrossRef]
• Weaver R.C., 2013. Re-framing the urban blight problem with trans-disciplinary insights from ecological economics. Ecological Economics 90: 168-176. [CrossRef]
• Weaver R.C., Bagchi-Sen S., 2013. Spatial analysis of urban decline: The geography of blight. Applied Geography 40: 61-70. [CrossRef] [Web of Science]
• Weaver R.C., Bagchi-Sen S. [in press]. Evolutionary analysis of neighbourhood decline using multilevel selection theory. The Annals of the Association of American Geographers.
• Wilson D.S., 2004. What is wrong with Absolute Individual Fitness? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19(5): 245-248.
• Wilson D.S., 2007. Evolution for everyone: How Darwin’s theory can change the way we think about our lives. Delta, New York.
• Wilson D.S., 2011. The neighbourhood project: Using evolution to improve my city, one block at a time. Little, Brown, Company, New York, NY.
• Wilson D.S., Wilson E.O., 2007. Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. The Quarterly Review of Biology 82(4): 327-348. [Web of Science] [CrossRef]
• Wilson D.S., Gowdy J.M., 2013. Evolution as a general theoretical framework for economics and public policy. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.008. [Web of Science] [CrossRef]
• Wilson D.S., Ostrom, E., Cox M.E., 2013. Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization. DOI: 10.1016/j. jebo.2012.12.010. [CrossRef] [Web of Science]
• Witt U., 1997. Self-organization and economics - What is new? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 8: 489-507.
• Wyly E.K., 1999. Continuity and change in the restless urban landscape. Economic Geography 75(4): 309-338. [CrossRef]

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/quageo-2014-0012