The effect of the functional asymmetry of the brain on face morphometry in the university students of mathematics and painting department

• Autorzy: Karacan K. , Sabanciogullari V. , Kosar M.I. , Karacan A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: The face is a complicated structure configurations of which are originated and components integrated during the developmental stages. Almost the whole of face is formed by neural crest cells migrating from the edge of the cranial neural folds to the pharyngeal arcus. Brain is an asymmetric organ both functionally and anatomically. While the left hemisphere is dominant in processing the verbal, mathematical and logical information, the right hemisphere is dominant in processing the perceptual, visible, spatial and artistic information. The functional differences in the left and right brain hemispheres might also cause differences in facial regions developing from the same centres as telencephalon during embryonic period. Therefore; we aimed to perform linear anthropometric measurements and determine whether functional asymmetry of brain creates any change in facial linear measurements, on the faces of students of painting and mathematics departments whose skills are different from each other. Materials and methods: This study was performed on 212 students. A total number of 22 measurements from 17 anthropometric points for each student were done. Measurements were carried out between November 2011 and February 2012. Results: Our findings revealed that there were statistically significant differences between two student groups in the face width, intercanthal distance, mandibular width, nose width, upper lip height and philtrum length. The comparison of genders revealed that there were statistically significant differences between all measured parameters. In addition, all students from both departments had euryprosopic face type when face type points were compared. Conclusions: Those differences might be related to the functional asymmetry of brain. Therefore it could be suggested that the functional asymmetry of brain could cause an asymmetry in the face as well as in the linear anthropometric measurements. (Folia Morphol 2019; 78, 3: 508–516)

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Morphologica
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 78
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.508–516,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Karacan K.

• Departmant of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sakarya, Sakarya, Turkey

autor

Sabanciogullari V.

• Department of Anatomy, Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, 58140 Sivas, Turkey

autor

Kosar M.I.

• Departmant of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sıtkı Koçman, Mugla, Turkey

autor

Karacan A.

• Departmant of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sakarya, Sakarya, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. Andrew OMW, Gillian MMK. Genetics of craniofacial development and malformation. Macmillan Magazines Ltd, June. 2001; 2: 458–468.
• 2. Arslan SG, Genç C, Odabaş B, et al. Comparison of facial proportions and anthropometric norms among Turkish young adults with different face types. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008; 32(2): 234–242, doi: 10.1007/s00266-007-9049-y, indexed in Pubmed: 17952492.
• 3. Bozkir MG, Karakas P, Oguz O. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004; 26(3): 212–219, doi: 10.1007/s00276-003-0202-2, indexed in Pubmed: 14625792.
• 4. Doğan H. Beyin paradoksları bağlamlı olarak örtülü bilgi geliştirme yöntemleri ve organizasyon yapıları arasında ilişki zinciri analizi. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2004; 7(1): 105–119.
• 5. Evelyne M, Frederic D, Hanife H, et al. Differential Lateralization for Words and Faces: Category or Psychophysics? J Cognitive Neurosci. 2008; 20(11): 2070–2087, doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20137.
• 6. Evereklioglu C, Doganay S, Er H, et al. Craniofacial Anthropometry in a Turkish Population. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2002; 39(2): 208–218, doi: 10.1597/1545-1569(2002)039<0208:caiatp>2.0.co;2.
• 7. Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR. Comparison of craniofacial measurements of young adult African-American and North American white males and females. Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 59(6): 692–698, doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000258954.55068.b4, indexed in Pubmed: 18046155.
• 8. Ferrario V, Sforza C, Colombo A, et al. Morphometry of the Orbital Region: A Soft-Tissue Study from Adolescence to Mid-Adulthood. Plastic Reconstructive Surg. 2001; 108(2): 285–292, doi: 10.1097/00006534-200108000-00001.
• 9. Geschwind N, Behan P. Left-handedness: association with immune disease, migraine, and developmental learning disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982; 79(16): 5097–5100, doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.16.5097, indexed in Pubmed: 6956919.
• 10. He ZJ, Jian Xc, Wu Xs, et al. Anthropometric measurement and analysis of the external nasal soft tissue in 119 young Han Chinese adults. J Craniofac Surg. 2009; 20(5): 1347–1351, doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181ae41cf, indexed in Pubmed: 19816253.
• 11. Hennessy RJ, McLearie S, Kinsella A, et al. Facial surface analysis by 3D laser scanning and geometric morphometrics in relation to sexual dimorphism in cerebral-craniofacial morphogenesis and cognitive function. J Anat. 2005; 207(3): 283–295, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00444.x, indexed in Pubmed: 16185253.
• 12. Hennessy RJ, McLearie S, Kinsella A, et al. Facial shape and asymmetry by three-dimensional laser surface scanning covary with cognition in a sexually dimorphic manner. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006; 18(1): 73–80, doi: 10.1176/jnp.18.1.73, indexed in Pubmed: 16525073.
• 13. Karaca O, Gülcen B, Kuş MA, et al. Morphometric facial analysis of Turkish adults. Balıkesir Health Sciences J. 2012; 1(1): 7–11.
• 14. Keleş P, Díyarbakirli S, Tan M, et al. Facial asymmetry in right- and left-handed men and women. Int J Neurosci. 1997; 91(3-4): 147–159, indexed in Pubmed: 9394222.
• 15. Kolar J, Salter EM. Craniofacial anthropometry: Practical measurement of the head and face for clinical, surgical, and research use. Thomas, Springfield, Ill. USA. 1997: 11–12.
• 16. Malas MA, Salbacak A, Aler A. Clinical significance of craniofacial anthropometric index and measurements. SDU Medical Faculty J. 1997; 4(1): 17–25.
• 17. Ngeow WC, Aljunid ST. Craniofacial anthropometric norms of Malays. Singapore Med J. 2009; 50(5): 525–528.
• 18. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971; 9(1): 97–113, indexed in Pubmed: 5146491.
• 19. Ozdemir S, Sigirli D, Ercan I, et al. Photographic facial soft tissue analysis of healthy turkish young adults: anthropometric measurements. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2008; 33(2): 175–184, doi: 10.1007/s00266-008-9274-z.
• 20. Sadler TW. Longman’s Medical Embryology. 12th Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, USA. 2012; 268–273.
• 21. Seftalioğlu A. General and specific human embryology. Tip Teknik Yayinclik, Ankara. 1998: 103–113.
• 22. Springer SP, Deutsch G. Left brain right brain, State University of New York at Stony Brook. WH Freeman and Company San Francisco; Fifth Edition. 1998; 4.
• 23. Ulgen M. Orthodontics: anomalies, etiology, growth and development, cephalometry, and diagnosis. Vol. 2. Yeditepe University Press House: Istanbul. 2000: 175.
• 24. Williams PL, Warwich R, Dyson M, et al. Osteology, Gray’s Anatomy. London, Churchill Livingstone Medical Division of Longman UK. 1995; 8: 393.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2018.0104