Environmental challenges of the Polish energy sector

• Autorzy: Jestin L , Wyrwa A. , Stezaly A. , Zysk J. , Pluta M. , Sliz B.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Our paper presents the results of the integrated assessment modelling of environmental and human health impacts of emissions in Poland. The analysis was performed based on the so-called National Scenario. The estimated emission levels of SO₂, NOx, and PMs for 2020 were used as the input data to model ambient concentrations and depositions of these pollutants. Exceedances of critical loads of acidity caused by nitrogen and sulphur depositions were calculated. External costs associated with human health impacts of air pollution were estimated. Additionally, ambient concentration of gaseous and particulate Hg were modelled based on 2005 EMEP emissions data. The main part of the analysis was carried out using the Eulerian Chemistry Transport Model POLAIR3D

Słowa kluczowe

EN

energy sector; Poland; emission; concentration; deposition; acidification; external cost; human health impact; emission level; pollutant; sulphur; nitrogen

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 19
• Numer: 2
• Strony: 331-335
• Opis fizyczny: p.331-335,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Jestin L

• EDF Polska, Nowy Swiat 19, 00-029 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Wyrwa A.

autor

Stezaly A.

autor

Zysk J.

autor

Pluta M.

autor

Sliz B.

Bibliografia

• 1. FREDRICH R., BICKEL P. ExternE. Externalities of energy. Methodology 2005 Update, Ed.; Directorate-general for Research. Sustainable Energy Systems: Brussels EUR 21951, 2005.
• 2. WHO. Quantification of the health effects of exposure to air pollution. Report. Bilthoven: Ed.; World Health Organization, 2000.
• 3. KREWITT W. External costs of energy – do the answers match the questions? Looking back at 10 years of ExternE. Energy Policy 30, 839, 2002.
• 4. NILSSON J., GRENNFELT P. Critical Loads for Sulphur and Nitrogen. Report from a workshop held at Skokloster, Sweden. Miljorapport 15, ISBN 87-7303-248-4, pp. 1-418, 1988.
• 5. SCHOPP W., AMANN M., COFAŁA J., HEYES C., KLIMONT Z. Integrated assessment of European air pollution emission control strategies. Environmental Modelling & Software 14, 1, 1999.
• 6. EMEP. http://www.emep.int/.
• 7. BOUTAHAR J., LACOUR S., MALLET V., QUELO D., ROUSTAN Y., SPORTISSE B. Development and validation of a fully modular platform for numerical modeling of air pollution: Polair3D. Int. J. Environment and Pollution, 22, (1/2), 17, 2004.
• 8. ROUSTAN Y. Modelling of the atmospheric dispersion of mercury, lead and cadmium at European scale. PhD thesis; Ecole nationale des ponts et chaussees, (http://cerea.enpc.fr/fich/these-roustan.pdf), Paris, 2005.
• 9. ZYŚK J., STĘŻAŁY A., PLUTA M., WYRWA A., ROUSTAN Y., SPORTISSE B. Air quality modeling system Polyphemus – validation of results. Current problems in air protection. Collective work / Ed. Anna Musialik-Piotrowska and Jan D. Rutkowski; PZITS: Wrocław, pp. 191-194, 2008 [In Polish].
• 10. MILL W. Update of Database of Critical Loads of Acidity and Eutrophication based on 1x1km spatial resolution. Internal Report of ENVIRO AGH-EDF Project. 2007.
• 11. LRTAP Manual on Methodologies and Criteria for Modelling and Mapping Critical Loads & Levels and Air Pollution Effects, Risks and Trends. UNECE Convention on Long – range Transboundary Air Pollution. 2004.
• 12. STĘŻAŁY A., WYRWA A., PLUTA M., ZYŚK J., ŚLIŻ B. Externalities of energy production – the hot issue, Ed.; Kiadja az Interregionalis Megujulo Energiaklaszter Egyesulet: Pecs, pp. 196-206, 2006.
• 13. SPADARO J.V., RABL A. Global Health Impacts and Costs Due to Mercury Emissions. Risk Analysis. 28, (3), 603, 2008