Lure sticks as a method to detect pine martens Martes martes

• Autorzy: Burki S. , Roth T. , Robin K. , Weber D.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Marten species are usually surveyed by trapping, snow tracking or cameratrapping with baits on trees. While testing the efficiency of a monitoring scheme for wildcats Felis silvestris silvestris in north-western Switzerland, we noticed that martens are attracted by lure sticks scented with valerian. On these sticks, the animals leaved some hairs that allowed us to identify the genus Martes by microscopic analysis. Additionally, the animal can be identified on pictures made by a camera trap posed close to the lure stick. In this paper, we compared the efficiency of different methods to find the most appropriate one in order to survey the pine marten Martes martes (Linnaeus, 1758) in Switzerland. For the method of valerian lure sticks we estimated a detectability of 0.08 per 14 days during the whole year. The detectability raised, when we applied American Hawbaker’s marten lure instead of the valerian tincture. In addition, the detectability was higher during the period April to June (p=0.2) compared to the whole year. If we identified the pine marten on the lure stick with pictures from the camera traps we reached a detectability of 0.21 during the whole year. Using only camera traps with baits on trees we could not take any picture of a pine marten.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

lure; detection method; pine marten; Martes martes; probability; site occupancy; monitoring; marten; camera; trapping

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 55
• Numer: 3
• Strony: 223-230
• Opis fizyczny: p.223-230,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Burki S.

• Burki Wildtier and Umwelt GmbH, Mettlen 299, CH-8762 Schwandi, Switzerland

autor

Roth T.

autor

Robin K.

autor

Weber D.

Bibliografia

• Bailey L. and Adams M. 2005. Occupancy models to study wildlife. USGS, science for a changing world 3096. U. S Department of the Interior, U. S Geological Survey: 2005–3096.
• Debrot S., Fivaz G., Mermod C. and Weber J.-M. 1982. Atlas des poils de mammifères d’Europe. Institut de Zoologie, Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel: 1–208.
• Foran D. S., Crooks K. C. and Minta S. C. 1997. DNA-based analysis of hair to identify species and individuals for population research and monitoring. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 840–847.
• Frantz A. C., Schaul M., Pope L. C., Fack F., Schley L., Muller C. P. and Roper T. J. 2004. Estimating population size by remotely plucked hair: the Eurasian badger. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 985–995. doi: 10.1111/ j.0021-8901.2004.00951.x
• Halfpenny J. C., Thompson R. W., Morse S. C., Holden T. and Rezendes P. 1995. Snow tracking. [In: American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine: Survey methods for their detection. W. J. Zielinski and T. E. Kucera, eds]. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-157, United States Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Research Station, California: 91–137.
• Hupe K. and Simon O. 2007. Die Lockstockmethode-eine nicht invasive Methode zum Nachweis der Europäischen Wildkatze (Felis silvestris silvestris). Informationsdienst Naturschutz Niedersachsen 27: 66–69.
• Kucera T. E., Soukkala A. M. and Zielinski W. J. 1995. Photographic Bait Station. [In: American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine: Survey methods for their detection. W. J. Zielinski and T. E. Kucera, eds]. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-157, United States Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Research Station, California: 25–62.
• MacKenzie D. I., Nichols J. D., Lachman G. B., Droege S., Royle J. A. and Langtimm C. A. 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83: 2248–2255.
• MacKenzie D. I., Nichols J. D., Royle J. A., Pollock K. H., Bailey L. L. and Hines J. E. 2006. Occupancy estimation and modeling. inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurence. Elsevier Inc., Burlington: 1–324.
• Marchesi P. 1989. Ecologie et comportement de la Martre (Martes martes L.) dans le Jura suisse. These Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel: 1–185.
• Marchesi P. 1995. Martes martes (L., 1758). [In: Säugetiere der Schweiz. J. Hausser, ed]. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel: 367–371.
• Marchesi P., Maddalena T., Blant M. and Holzgang O. 2004. Situation des petits carnivores en Suisse et bases pour un programm de monitoring national. Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Wildtierbiologie, Sion (unpubl.): 1–66.
• Mowat G. and Paetkau D. 2002. Estimating marten (Martes americana) population size using hair capture and genetic tagging. Wildlife Biology 8: 201–209.
• Mowat G., Shurgot C. and Poole K. G. 2000. Using track plates and remote cameras to detect marten and shorttailed weasels in coastal cedar hemlock forest. Northwestern Naturalist 81(3): 113–121. doi: 10.2307/3536822
• Pellet J. and Schmidt B. R. 2004. Monitoring distributions using call surveys: estimating site occupancy, detection probabilities and inferring absence. Biological Conservation 123: 27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.10.005
• Pilot M., Gralak B., Goszczyński J. and Posłuszny M. 2007. A method of genetic identification of pine marten (Martes martes) and beech marten (Martes foina) and its application to faecal samples. Journal of Zoology 271: 140–147.
• R Development Core Team. 2007 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
• Teerink B. J. 1991. Hair of West-European mammals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1–222.
• Weber D. 1988. Foraging in polecats (Mustela putorius L.) of Switzerland: The case of a specialist anuran predator. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 54: 377–392.
• Weber D., Ginter H.-P., Hefti-Gautschi B. 2009. Die aktuelle Verbreitung der Wildkatze (Felis silvestris silvestris Schreber, 1777) im Kanton Basel-Landschaft (NWSchweiz) und in angrenzenden Gebieten. Mitteilungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaften beider Basel 11: 177–185.
• Zalewski A. 1999. Identifying sex and individuals of pine marten using snow track measurements. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27: 28–31.
• Zielinski W. J. 1995. Track plates. [In: American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine: Survey methods for their detection. W. J. Zielinski and T. E. Kucera, eds]. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-157, United States Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Research Station, California: 67–86.
• Zielinski W. J. and Kucera T. E. 1995. American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine: Survey methods for their detection. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-157, United States Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Research Station, California: 1–137.
• Zielinski W. J. and Truex R. L. 1995. Distinguishing tracks of Marten and Fisher at Track-plate stations. Journal of Wildlife Management 59: 571–579. doi: 10.2307/3802465