Gillnet selectivity to roach, Rutilus rutilus, from the Szczecin Lagoon, Poland

• Autorzy: Psuty I. , Draganik B. , Blady W.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background. Roach, Rutilus rutilus, comprise a large proportion of the total catch in the Szczecin Lagoon, and are caught mainly as bycatch in gillnets targeting perch, Perca fluviatilis. The minimum landing length for roach and perch is 17 cm TL and the minimum mesh size is 30 mm bar length. However, little is known about the selectivity of roach, which may have implications for implementing effective regulations. Consequently, the aims of the study were to estimate roach selectivity curves and to compare the results with perch selectivity. Materials and Methods. The study was based on the length frequency of catch from standardized fishing practice with commercial gillnets of mesh sizes ranging from 25 to 35 mm (bar length) and modelled using various generalized linear models. The best model was selected using deviance criteria. Results. The log-normal selectivity model provided the best fit, with spread relevant to mesh size under the assumption of equal fishing power. The estimated parameters were 18.7 cm and 1.5 (mode and spread of selectivity curve for the smallest mesh size). Conclusion. Although the most efficient mesh size for roach was 26 mm, its use in the Szczecin Lagoon is limited by impact on perch. All the studied mesh sizes prevented catches of undersized roach, while mesh sizes from 28 mm prevented catches of undersized perch (MLL = 17 cm TL). The authors concluded that the current 30 mm minimum mesh size is likely effective at preventing the harvest of undersized perch and roach.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

roach; Rutilus rutilus; Szczecin Lagoon; Poland; gillnet selectivity; nonlinear modelling

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: 37
• Numer: 1
• Strony: 17-23
• Opis fizyczny: p.17-23,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Psuty I.

• Sea Fisheries Institute in Gdynia, Gdynia, Poland

autor

Draganik B.

autor

Blady W.

Bibliografia

• Barthelmes D. 1983. Effects of eutrophication and fisheries management on fish faunas of cyprinid lakes. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych H 3 (100): 31–44.
• Draganik B. 2003. The exploitation of pikeperch in the Polish Part of the Szczecin Lagoon. Acta Scientarum Polonorum,Piscaria 2: 55–70.
• Hamley J.M. 1975. Review of gillnet selectivity. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 32: 1943–1969.
• Hamley J.M., Regier H.A. 1973. Direct estimates of gillnet selectivity to walleye (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 30: 817–830.
• Holst R., Moth-Poulsen T. 1995. Numerical recipes and statistical methods for gillnet selectivity. ICES Conference Meeting 1995 B/18.
• Holt S.J. 1963.Amethod for determining gear selectivity and its application. ICNAF Special Publication 5: 106–115.
• Johansson L., Persson L. 1986. The fish community of temperate eutrophic lakes. Pp. 237–266. In: Riemann B., Sondergaard M. (eds.) Carbon Dynamics of Eutrophic, Temperate Lakes: the Structure and Function of the Pelagic Environment. Elsevier,Amsterdam.
• Kirkwood G.P., Walker T.I. 1986. Gill net mesh selectivities for gummy shark, Mustelus antarcticus Günther, taken In south-eastern Australian waters. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 37: 689–697.
• Lammens E.H.R.R., Frank-Landman A., McGillavry P.J., Vlink B. 1992. The role of predation and competition In determining the distribution of common bream, roach and white bream in Dutch eutrophic lakes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 33: 195–205.
• Lessmark O. 1983. Competition between perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) and roach (Rutilus rutilus L.) in south Swedish lakes. PhD thesis, Institute of Limnology, University of Lund, Sweden.
• McCombie A.M., Berst A.H. 1969. Some effects of shape and structure of fish on selectivity of gillnets. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 26: 2681–2689.
• McCullagh P., Nelder J.A. 1989. Generalized linear models.2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London.
• Millar R.B. 2003–2005. The gillnetfunctions package for R. http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~millar/selectware/R/gillnets/.
• Millar R.B., Holst R. 1997. Estimation of gillnet and hook selectivity using log-linear models. ICES Journal of Marine Science 54: 471–477.
• Persson L. 1983. Effects of intra and interspesific competition on dynamics and size structure in a roach (Rutilus rutilus) and a perch (Perca fluviatilis) population. Oikos 41:126–132.
• Persson L., Diehl S., Johansson L., Andersson G., Hamrin S.F. 1991. Shifts in fish communities along the productivity gradient of temperate lakes—patterns and the importance of size-structured interactions. Journal of Fish Biology 38: 281–293.
• Persson L., Greenberg L.A. 1990. Juvenile competitive bottlenecks: the perch (Perca fluviatilis) and roach (Rutilus rutilus) interaction. Ecology 71 : 44–56.
• Psuty I. 1996. Selectivity in gill-net fishery for pikeperch in the Polish part of the Vistula Lagoon. Bulletin of the Sea Fisheries Institute 3 (139): 13–28.
• Psuty I., Borowski B. 1997. The selectivity of gill nets to bream (Abramis brama L.) fished in the Polish part of the Vistula Lagoon. Fisheries Research 32: 249–261.
• Psuty-Lipska I., Madsen N., Draganik B., Blady W. 2006.Gill net selectivity for perch (Perca fluviatilis) in the Szczecin Lagoon, Poland. Fisheries Research 80: 339–344.
• Regier H.A., Robson D.S. 1966. Selectivity of gillnets, especially to lake whitefish. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 23: 423–454.
• Reis E.G., Pawson M.G. 1999. Fish morphology and estimating selectivity by gillnets. Fisheries Research 39: 263–273.
• Sainsbury K.J., Punt A.E., Smith A.D.M. 2000. Design of operational management strategies for achieving fishery ecosystem objectives. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57: 731–741.
• Schernewski G., Wielgat M. 2001. Eutrophication of the shallow Szczecin Lagoon (Baltic Sea): modelling, management and the impact of weather. Pp. 87–98. In: Brebbia C.A. (ed.)Coastal engineering. Computer Modelling of seas and coastal regions. Witpress, Southampton.
• Sparre P., Ursin E., Venema S.C. 1989. Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part 1. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 306/1.
• Walters C.J., Hilborn R. 1976.Adaptive control of fishing systems.Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 33:145–159.
• Wulff A. 1986. Mathematical model for selectivity of gill nets.Archiv für Fischereiwissenschaft 37: 101–106.