Survey of an otter Lutra lutra population in Southern Italy: site occupancy and influence of sampling season on species detection

• Autorzy: Fusillo R. , Marcelli M. , Boitani L.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In order to assess the current status of the otterLutra lutra Linnaeus, 1758 in Southern Campania (Italy), we surveyed 141 sites for spraints (faeces) in 2001. Fifty-eight sites were surveyed during the winter and in the following summer in order to test, through an estimation-based approach, the influence of sampling season on species detection. Site occupation in the study area was high (69.5%) and possibly underestimated, because the survey was affected by non-detection errors. Our analyses showed that winter surveying markedly underestimated true otter occupancy at the 58 sites (51.7% vs 97.1%), whereas summer surveying was very reliable (91.4%). Rains and floods may have removed spraints during winter, thereby reducing the detection probability to 0.534. These results suggest that otter standard surveys in areas with Mediterranean-type climates should be conducted during summer or periods without prolonged precipitation. Comparing our results with those of the 1985 National survey, we found an occupancy increase from 65.8 to 100%. We could not establish whether this change reflected a population increase or was due to possible non-detection errors that occurred in the 1985 survey. However, the present occupancy substantiates the strategic relevance of the study area for planning the conservation of Italian otters.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

species detection; distribution range; site occupation; Eurasian otter; Italy; standard survey; seasonal detectability; European country; otter; Lutra lutra

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: 52
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.251-260,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Fusillo R.

• University of Rome 'La Sapienza', Viale dell' Universita 32, 00185 Rome, Italy

autor

Marcelli M.

autor

Boitani L.

Bibliografia

• ArcView GIS 3.3. 2002. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California.
• Burnham K. P. and Anderson D. R. (eds) 2002. Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd Edition. Springer-Verlag, New York: 1–488.
• Calvario E. and Sarrocco S. (eds) 1997. [Red List of Italian Vertebrates]. WWF Italia. Settore DiversitàBiologica. Serie Ecosistema Italia. DB6: 1–81. [In Italian with English summary]
• Cassola F. (ed) 1986. [The Otter in Italy. Status, distribution and conservation of an endangered species]. WWF Italia, Serie Atti e Studi 5: 1–135. [In Italian with English summary]
• Conroy J. W. H. and Chanin P. R. F. 2003. The status of the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) in Europe — a review. [In: First Otter Toxicology Conference. Vol. 1. J. W. H. Conroy, P. Yoxon and A. C. Gutleb, eds]. Journal of the International Otter Survival Fund, Isle of Skye: 7–28.
• Crawford A. 2003. Fourth otter survey of England 2000–2002. Conservation Section, Environment Agency, Bristol: 1–88.
• Farinha N. J. R. 1995. [Distribution and ecology of the Otter (Lutra lutra Linnaeus, 1758) in the Montesinho Natural Park]. Parque Natural de Montesinho/Instituto de Conservação da Natureza: 1–269. [In Portuguese]
• Fusillo R. 2006. [Habitat and food resources of the otter (Lutra lutra L.) in Southern Italy. Variation factors and selection]. PhD thesis, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma: 1–175. [In Italian]
• Garel M., Cugnasse J. M., Gaillard J. M., Loison A., Santosa Y. and Maublanc M. L. 2005. Effect of observer experience on the monitoring of a mouflon population. Acta Theriologica 50: 109–114.
• Gasith A. and Resh V. H. 1999. Streams in Mediterranean climate regions: abiotic influences and biotic responses to predictable seasonal events. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 51–81.
• Kranz A. and Toman A. 2000. Otters recovering in man-made habitats in central Europe. [In: Mustelids in a modern world; management and conservation aspects of small carnivore-human interactions. H. I. Griffith, ed]. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 163–183.
• Kruuk H. 1992. Scent marking by otters (Lutra lutra): signalling the use of resources. Behavioural Ecology 3: 133–140.
• Kruuk H. and Conroy J. W. H. 1987. Surveying otterLutra lutra populations: a discussion of problems with spraints. Biological Conservation 41: 179–183.
• Macdonald S. and Mason C. 1983. The otterLutra lutra in Southern Italy. Biological Conservation 25: 95–101.
• Macdonald S. and Mason C. 1987. Seasonal marking in an otter population. Acta Theriologica 32: 449–462.
• MacKenzie D. I. 2006. Modeling the probability of resource use: the effect of, and dealing with, detecting a species imperfectly. The Journal of Wildlife Management 70: 367–374.
• MacKenzie D. I., Nichols J. D., Lachman G. B., Droege S., Royle J. A. and Langtimm C. A. 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83: 2248–2255.
• Marcelli M. 2006. [Spatial structure and ecological determinants of otter (Lutra lutra) distribution in Italy. Development of predictive models for ecological inference and conservation]. PhD thesis, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma: 1–108. [In Italian with English summary]
• Mason C. and Macdonald S. 1987. The use of spraints for surveying otterLutra lutra populations: an evaluation. Biological Conservation 41: 167–177.
• Mazerolle M. J., Desrochers A. and Rochefort L. 2005. Landscape characteristics influence pond occupancy by frogs after accounting for detectability. Ecological Applications 15: 824–834.
• PRESENCE version 2.0. 2004. Hines J. E. USGS, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD, USA.
• Prigioni C., Remonti L., Balestrieri A., Sgrosso S., Priore G., Misin C., Viapiana M., Spada S., and Anania R. 2005. Distribution and sprainting activity of the Otter (Lutra lutra) in the Pollino National Park (southern Italy). Ethology Ecology and Evolution 17: 171–180.
• Pulliam H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks and population regulation. The American Naturalist 132: 652–661.
• Rathert D., White D., Sifneos J. C. and Hughes R. M. 1999. Environmental correlates of species richness for native freshwater fish in Oregon, USA. Journal of Biogeography 26: 257–273.
• Reuther C., Dolch D., Green R., Jahrl J., Jefferies D., Krekemeyer A., Kucerova M., Madsen A. B., Romanowski J., Roche K., Ruiz-Olmo J., Teubner J. and Trinidade A. 2000. Surveying and monitoring distribution and population trends of the Eurasian Otter (Lutra lutra) — Guidelines and evaluation of the standard method for surveys as recommended by the European Section of the IUCN/SSC Otter Specialist Group. Habitat No. 12, Hankensbüttel: 1–148.
• Righini G., Costantini E. A. C. and Sulli L. 2001. [The database of the soil regions of Italy]. Bollettino della Società Italiana Scienza del Suolo 50, Suppl.: 261–271. [In Italian with English summary]
• Ruiz-Olmo J. 1998. Influence of altitude on the distribution, abundance and ecology of the otter (Lutra lutra). [In: Behaviour and ecology of riparian mammals. N. Dunstone and M. L. Gorman, eds]. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London (71), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 159–176.
• Ruiz-Olmo J. and Delibes M. 1998. La nutria en España ante el horizonte del año 2000. Sociedad española para el estudio y la conservación de los Mamiferós (SECEM), Grupo Nutria, Barcelona: 1–300.
• Ruiz-Olmo J. and Gosàlbez J. 1997. Observation on the sprainting behaviour of the otterLutra lutra in the NE Spain. Acta Theriologica 42: 259–270.
• Strachan R. and Jefferies D. J. 1996. Otter survey of England 1991–1994. A report on the decline and recovery of the otter in England and on its distribution, status and conservation in 1991–1994. The Vincent Wildlife Trust, London: 1–223.
• Strahler A. N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 38: 913–920.