Mites [Acari] as indicators of soil biodiversity and land use monitoring: a review

• Autorzy: Gulvik M E
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Soil is an important component for monitoring of sustainability of land use in relation to both the conservation of natural resources and biodiversity of ecosystems. Recently research has focused on the role of mites (Acari) in biomonitoring and their importance as soil bioindicators. Mite communities are extremely sensitive to all types of soil disturbance. This article presents a review of some studies on mite communities in order to discuss whether the diversity and numbers of mites present in the soil can reflect human impact on ecosystems and landscape, and whether mites can be used in monitoring systems. Limited data available about mite communities in agricultural ecosystems (in use and abandoned) in SW Norway from author’s own studies (published and in prep.) are compared with data from ca. 55 papers (mostly concerning Europe). IT was concluded that: (1) Most oribatid mites with their long life span, low fecundity, slow development and low dispersion ability can be a robust indicator of the environment. Changes in the dominance structure of mite communities (Oribatida to Actinedida ratio) are suggested to be an ‘early warning’ criterion for stressed mite communities. (2) Both the number of species and the percentage abundance of Nothroidea and Ptyctimina decrease following human impact on the landscape. Even if individuals cannot be determined to species levels (e.g. Ptyctimina), the percent contribution and frequency of these taxa in relation to stress gradient (input levels) within the landscape provide valuable data. (3) Tectocepheus velatus (Michael 1880) and other oribatid taxa with a similar lifehistory strategy should be evaluated as potential bioindicators for impoverished ecosystems. (4) National and local reference data sets on the biodiversity of mite communities in diverse habitats and along stress gradients need to be collected. (5) Residual natural and semi-natural habitats (such as old woodlands, riparian ecosystems, old hedges and grasslands) with species-rich mite communities found in rural and urban landscapes should be preserved as refuges for dispersion of soil fauna. (6) Comparison of mite communities in traditional, low-input farmland in Norway with those from humandominated landscape in other European countries can contribute to a better understanding of how human activity alters biodiversity along land-use gradients. This will aid the development of a soil bioindicator system. (7) There is a need to develop standardised procedures for the collection of samples and analyses of data sets adapted to ecological soil acarology.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Gamasida; Oribatida; Actinedida; indicator; Acari; land; mite; ecosystem; biomonitoring; soil biodiversity; Uropodina; land monitoring

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: 55
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.415-440,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Gulvik M E

• Sogn of Fjordane University College, P.O.Box 133, N-6851 Sogndal, Norway

Bibliografia

• Anderson J.M. 1975 – The enigma of soil animal species diversity (In: Progress in Soil Ecology, Proceedings of the 5th International Colloquium of Soil Zoology, Prague, 1973, Ed. J. Vanek) pp. 51–58.
• Arnqvist G., Wooster D. 1995 – Metaanalysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution – Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 236–240.
• Balogh J., Balogh P. 2002 – Identification keys to the oribatid mites of the extra-holarctic regions. Part I – Borsodi Nyomda, Miskolc, Hungary, 453 pp.
• Balmford A., Crane P., Dobson A., Green R.E., Mace G.M. 2005 – The 2010 challenge: data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights – Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 360: 221–228.
• Battigelli J.P., Spence J.R., Langor D.W., Berch, S. 2004 – Short-term impact of forest soil compaction and organic matter removal on soil mesofauna density and oribatid mite diversity – Can. J. Forest Res. 34: 1136–1149.
• Beare M.H., Hus S., Coleman D.C., Hendrix P.F. 1997a – Influences of mycelial fungi on soil aggregation and organic matter storage in conventional and no-tillage soils – Appl. Soil Ecol. 5: 211–219.
• Beare M.H., Reddy M.V., Tian G., Srivastava S.C. 1997b – Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystem function in the tropics: the role of decomposer biota – Appl. Soil Ecol. 6: 87–108.
• Beare M.H., Parmelee R.W., Hendrix P.F., Cheng W. 1992 – Microbial and faunal interactions and effects on litter nitrogen and decomposition in agroecosystems – Ecol. Monogr. 62: 569–591.
• Beck L., Römbke J., Breure A.M., Mulder C. 2005 – Considerations for the use of soil ecological classification and assessment concepts in soil protection – Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 62: 189–200.
• Behan-Pelletier V.M. 1999 – Oribatid mite biodiversity in agroecosystems: role of bioindication – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 74: 411–423.
• Behan-Pelletier V.M. 2003 – Acari and Collembola biodiversity in Canadian agricultural soils – Can. J. Soil Sci. 83: 279–288.
• Behan-Pelletier W., Newton G. 1999 – Linking soil biodiversity and ecosystem function – The taxonomic dilemma – Bioscience, 49: 149–153.
• Bengtsson J. 1994 – Temporal predictability in forest soil communities – J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 653–665.
• Bengtsson J. 1998 – Which species? What kind of diversity? Which ecosystem function? Some problems in studies of relations between biodiversity and ecosystem function – Appl. Soil Ecol. 10: 191–199.
• Bengtsson J., Lundkvist H., Saetre P., Sohlenius B., Solbreck B. 1998 – Effects of organic matter removal on the soil food web: Forestry practices meet ecological theory – Appl. Soil Ecol. 9: 137–143.
• Bengtsson J., Nilsson S. G., Franc A., Menozzi P. 2000 – Biodiversity, disturbance, ecosystem function and management of European forests – Forest Ecol. Manag. 132: 39–50.
• Bengtsson J., Ahnström J., Weibull A.C. 2005 – The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis – J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 261–269.
• Bielska I. 1986 – Communities of moss mites (Acari, Oribatei) of chosen grasslands periodically flooded with liquid manure – Pol. ecol. Stud. 12: 163–178.
• Black H.I.J., Parekh N.R., Chaplow J.S., Monson F., Watkins J., Creamer R., Potter E.D., Poskitt J.M., Rowland P., Ainsworth G., Hornung M. 2003 – Assessing soil biodiversity across Great Britain: national trends in the occurrence of heterotrophic bacteria and invertebrates in soil – J. Environ. Manage. 67: 255–266.
• Blair J.M., Parmelee R.W., Wyman R.L., 1994 – A comparison of the forest floor invertebrate communities of 4 forest types in the northeastern United-States – Pedobiologia, 38: 146–160.
• Błoszyk J. 1999 – Geograficzne i ekologiczne zroznicowanie zgrupowan roztoczy z kohorty Uropodina (Acari: Mesostigmata) w Polsce. 1. Uropodina lasow gradowych (Carpinion betuli) [Geographical and ecological variability of mites of the cohort Uropodina (Acari: Mesostigmata) in Poland. 1. Uropodine mites of oak-hornbeam forests (Carpinion betuli)] – Kontekst, Poznan, 245 pp.
• Błoszyk J., Olszanowski Z. 1984 – Uroseius (Apionoseius) gaieri (Schwiezer, 1961) nowy dla fauny Polski gatunek roztocza (Acari, Uropodina) [Uroseius (Apionoseius) gaieri (Schwiezer, 1961) new species for the Polish fauna] – Przegl. Zool. 28: 491–496.
• Bradford M.A., Eggers T., Newington J.E., Tordoff G.M. 2007 – Soil faunal assemblage composition modifies root ingrowth to plant litter patches – Pedobiologia, 50: 505–513.
• Breure A.M., Mulder C., Römbke J., Ruf A. 2005 – Ecological classification and assessment concepts in soil protection – Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 62: 211–229.
• Brussaard L., Bouwman L.A., Geurs M., Hassink J. 1990 – Biomass, composition and temporal dynamics of soil organisms of a silt loam soil under conventional and integrated management – Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 38: 283–302.
• Büchs W. 2003 – Biodiversity and agri-environmental indicators – general scopes and skills with special reference to the habitat level – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98: 35–78.
• Buckland S.T., Magurran A.E., Green R.E., Fewster R.M. 2005 – Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices – Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 360: 243–254.
• Buryn R., Hartmann P. 1992 – Gamasid fauna (Acari, Mesostigmata) of a hedge and adjacent meadows in Upper Franconia (Bavaria, Germany) – Pedobiologia, 36: 97–108.
• Cancela da Fonseca J.P. 1991 – Ecological diversity and ecological systems complexity: local or global approach – Rev. Écol. Biol. Sol 28: 51–66.
• Clapperton M.J., Kanashiro D.A., Behan-Pelletier V.M. 2002 – Changes in abundance and diversity of microarthropods associated with Fescue prairie grazing regimes – Pedobiologia, 46: 496–511.
• Čoja T., Bruckner A. 2006 – The maturity index applied to soil gamasine mites from five natural forests in Austria – Appl. Soil Ecol. 34: 1–9.
• Crossley D.A., Mueller B.R., Perdue J.C. 1992 – Biodiversity of microarthropods in agricultural soils: Relations to processes – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 40: 37–44.
• Davis B.N.K. 1963 – A study of micro-arthropod communities in mineral soils near Corby, Northants – J. Anim. Ecol. 32: 49–71.
• de Goede R.G.M., Brussaard L. 2002 – Soil zoology: an indispensable component of integrated ecosystem studies – Eur. J. Soil Biol. 38: 1–6.
• Didden W.A.M., Marinissen J.C.Y., Vreeken-Bujis M.J., Burgers S.L.G.E., de Fluiter R., Geurs M., Brussaard L. 1994 – Soil meso- and macrofauna in two agricultural systems: factors affecting population dynamics and evaluation of their role in carbon and nitrogen dynamics – Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 51: 171–186.
• Ducarme X., André H.M., Lebrun Ph. 2002 – Soil biodiversity: myth, reality or conning? – Oikos, 96: 3–24.
• Dudley N., Baldock D., Nasi R., Stolton S. 2005 – Measuring biodiversity and sustainable management in forests and agricultural landscapes – Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360: 457–470.
• Edland T. 1994 – Side-effects of fungicide and insecticide sprays on phytoseiid mites in apple orchards – Norw. J. Agric. Sc. Suppl. 17: 195–204.
• Edwards C.A. 1990. Symphyla – (In: Soil biology guide, Ed. D.L. Dindal) – Wiley, J. Toronto, pp. 891–910.
• Evans G.O., Sheala J.G., MacFarlane D. 1961 – The terressstrial Acari of the British Isles. An introduction to their morphology, biology and classification – London, 219 pp.
• Gardi C., Tomaselli M., Parisi V., Petraglia A., Santini C. 2002 – Soil quality indicators and biodiversity in northern Italian permanent grasslands – Eur. J. Soil Biol. 38: 103–110.
• Giller P.S. 1996 – The diversity of soil communities, the ‘poor man’s tropical rainforest’ – Biodivers. Conserv. 5: 135–168.
• Gomoryova E. 2004 – Small-scale variation of microbial activities in a forest soil under a beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stand – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 311–321 2004.
• Guggenberger G., Frey S.D., Six J., Paustian K., Elliott E.T. 1999 – Bacterial and fungal cell-wall residues in conventional and no-tillage agrosystems – Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63: 1188–1198.
• Gulvik M.E., Solhøy T., Austad I. 2003 – Nothroidea (Acari: Oribatida) in Inner Sogn, Western Norway. A study of semi-natural vegetation types and young deciduous woodland. (In: Gjengroing av kulturmark, Eds. I. Austad, L.N. Hamre, E. Adland) – Bergen Museum Skrifter nr. 15, Universitetet i Bergen og Høgskulen i Sogn og Fjordane, pp. 119–124.
• Gulvik M.E., Błoszyk J., Austad I., Bajaczyk R., Piwczynski D. 2007 – Patterns of microarthropod communities related to different land use regime in a traditional farm in Western Norway – Pol. J. Ecol. (submitted)
• Gwiazdowicz D.J., Klemt J. 2004 – Mesostigmatic mites (Acari, Gamasida) in selected microhabitats of the Biebrza National Park (NE Poland) – Biol. Lett. 41: 11–19.
• Gwiazdowicz D.J., Kmita M. 2004 – Mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) from selected microhabitats of the Ujscie Warty National Park – Acta Sci. Pol. Silv. Colendar. Rat. Ind. Lignar. 3: 49–55.
• Gwiazdowicz D.J., Gulvik M.E. 2005a – Checklist of Norwegian mesostigmatid mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) – Norw. J. Entomol. 52: 117–125.
• Gwiazdowicz D.J., Gulvik M.E. 2005b – Mesostigmatid mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) new to the fauna of Norway – Norw. J. Entomol. 52: 103–109.
• Hågvar S. 1994 – Log-normal distribution of dominance as an indicator of stressed soil microarthropod communities? – Acta Zool. Fenn. 195: 71–80.
• Hågvar S. 1998a – The relevance of the RioConvention on biodiversity to conserving the biodiversity of soils – Appl. Soil Ecol. 9: 1–7.
• Hågvar S. 1998b – Mites (Acari) developing inside decomposing spruce needles: Biology and effect on decomposition rate – Pedobiologia, 42: 358–377.
• Hågvar S., Amundsen T. 1981 – Effect of liming and artificial acid rain on the mite (Acari) fauna in coniferous forest – Oikos, 37: 7–20.
• Hågvar S., Kjøndal B.R. 1981 – Effects of artifical acid rain on the microarthropod fauna in decomposing birch leaves – Pedobiologia, 22: 409–422.
• Hågvar S., Abrahamsen G. 1990 – Microarthropoda and Enchytraeidae (Oligochaeta) in naturally lead-contaminated soil: a gradient study – Environ. Entomol. 19: 1263–1277.
• Hedlund K., Griffiths B., Christensen S., Scheu S., Setälä H., Tscharntke T., Verhoef H. 2004 – Trophic interactions in changing landscapes: responses of soil food webs – Basic Appl. Ecol. 5: 495–503.
• Helle O. 1971 – The epidemiology of gastrointestinal parasite infection of sheep on lowland pastures in Norway. Thesis – Norges Veterinærhøgskole, Oslo, 220 pp.
• Hendrix P.F., Crossley D.A.Jr., Colleman D.C., Odum E.P., Groffman P.M. 1986 – Detritus food-webs in conventional and no-tillage agrosystems – Bioscience, 36: 374–380.
• Horwood J.A., Butt K.R. 2000 – Changes within oribatid mite communities associated with Scots pine regeneration – Web Ecology, 1: 76–81.
• Hubert J. 2000 – The oribatid community (Acari: Oribatida) on a dry cow pasture - Ekologia (Bratisl.) 19: 354–364.
• Hubert J., Žilová M., Pekár S. 2001 – Feeding preferences and gut contents of three panphytophagous oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) – Eur. J. Soil Boil. 37: 197–208.
• Hubert J., Kučerová A., Münzbergová Z. 2004 – The comparison of oribatid mite (Acari: Oribatida) communities on various patches in the seminatural meadow – Ekologia (Bratisl) 23: 328–341.
• Huhta V. 2007 – The role of soil fauna in ecosystems: A historical review – Pedobiologia, 50: 489–495.
• Huhta V., Niemi R. 2003 – Communities of soil mites (Acarina) in planted birch stands compared with natural forests in central Finland – Can. J. For. Res. 33: 171–189.
• Johnston J.M., Crossley D.A.Jr. 1993 – The significance of coarse woody debris for the diversity of soil mites (In: Biodiversity and coarse woody debris in southern forests, Proceedings of the Workshop on coarse woody debris in southern forests: Effects on Biodiversity – Athens, GA 1993, Eds. J.W. McMinn, D.A. Crossley Jr) pp. 82–87.
• Kimberling D.N., Karr J.R., Fore L.S. 2001 – Measuring human disturbance using terrestrial invertebrates in the shrub-steppe of eastern Washington (USA) – Ecologic. Indicators, 1: 63–81.
• Kinnear A., Tongway D. 2004 – Grazing impact on soil mites of semi-arid chenopod shrublands in Western Australia – J. Arid Environ. 56: 63–82.
• Koehler H.H. 1997 – Mesostigmata (Gamasina, Uropodina), efficient predators in agroecosystems – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 62: 105–117.
• Koehler H.H. 1999 – Predatory mites (Gamasina, Mesostigmata) – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 74: 395–410.
• Koehler H.H. 2000 – Natural regeneration and succession – results from a 13 years study with reference to mesofauna and vegetation, and implications for management – Landscape Urban Plan. 51: 123–130.
• Kounda-Kiki C., Vaculik A., Ponge J.F., Sarthou C. 2004 – Soil arthropods in a developmental succession on the Nouragues inselberg (French Guiana) – Biol. Fertil. Soils, 40: 119–127.
• Kováč L., L’Uptacik P., Miklisova D., Mati R. 2001 – Soil Oribatida and Collembola communities across a land depression in an arable field – Eur. J. Soil Biol. 37: 285–289.
• Krantz G.W. 1978 – A manual of acarology – Oregon State University Book Stores, INC. Oregon, 508 pp.
• Krebs C.J. 1999 – Ecological Methodology – 2nd edn. USA: Addison–Welsey, Educational Publishers, 619 pp.
• Lagerlöf J., Andrén O. 1985 – Succession and activity of microarthropods and enchytraeids during barley straw decomposition – Pedobiologia, 28: 343–357.
• Leetham J.W., Milchunas D.G. 1985 – The composition and distribution of soil microarthropods in the shortgrass steppe in relation to water, root biomass, and grazing by cattle – Pedobiologia, 28: 311–325.
• Lindberg N., Persson T. 2004 – Effects of long-term nutrient fertilisation and irrigation on the microarthropod community in a boreal Norway spruce stand – Forest Ecol. Manag. 188: 125–135.
• Luxton M. 1981 – Studies on the prostigmatic mites of a Danish beech wood soil – Pedobiologia, 22: 277–303.
• Madej G. 2004 – Rozwój zgrupowań roztoczy Mesostigmata (Arachnida, Acari) na nieuzytkach poprzemysłowych [Developpment of communities of mesostigmatid mites (Arachnida, Acari) in areas of postindustrial wastelands] – Wyd. Uniwersytetu Slaskiego, Katowice, 206 pp.
• Madej G., Skubała P. 2002 – Colonization of a dolomitic dump by mesostigmatid mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) (In: Acarid phylogeny and evolution. Adaptations in mites and ticks, Eds. F. Bernini, R. Nannelli, G. Nuzzaci, E. de Lillo) – Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 175–184.
• Mäder P., Fliessbach A., Dubois D., Gunst L., Fried P., Niggli U. 2002 – Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming – Science, 296: 1694–1697.
• Mąkol J. 2005. Trombidiidae (Acari: Actinotrichida: Trombidioidea) of Poland – Natura optima dux Foundation, Warsaw, 259 pp.
• Mąkol J., Gulvik M.E. 2002 – Parasitengona terrestra (Acari: Actinotrichida) of Sogn og Fjordande (Norway). (In: Postepy polskiej akarologii [The advances in Polish acarology] Ed. S. Ignatowicz) – Wyd. SGGW, Warsaw, pp. 100–117.
• Maraun M., Migge S., Schaefer M., Scheu S. 1998. – Selection of microfungal food by six oribatid mite species (Oribatida, Acari) from two different beech forests – Pedobiologia, 42: 232-240.
• Maraun M., Scheu S. 2000 – The structure of oribatid mite communities (Acari, Oribatida): patterns, mechanisms and implications for future research – Ecography, 23: 374–383.
• Maraun M., Martens H., Migge S., Theenhaus A., Scheu S. 2003 – Adding to ’the enigma of soil animal diversity’: fungal feeders and saprophagous soil invertebrates prefer similar food substrates – Eur. J. Soil Biol. 39: 85–95.
• Mc Gonigle T.P. 1995 – The significance of grazing on fungi in nutrient cycling – Can. J. Bot. 73: 1370–1376.
• Mehl R. 1979 – Checklist of Norwegian ticks and mites (Acari) – Fauna Norw. Ser. B. 26: 31–45.
• Moore J.C., DeRuiter P.C. 1993 – Assessment of disturbance on soil ecosystems – Vet. Parasitol. 48: 75–85.
• Niedbała W. 1971 – Fauna roztoczy (Acari) glebowych w dwóch różnych biotopach oraz w strefie przejściowej między nimi [Fauna of soil mites (Acari) in two different biotopes and in transitional area between them.] – Bad. Fizjog. Pol. zach. B. (Poznan) 24: 217–220.
• Niedbała W. 2000 – Dlaczego przestałem zajmować się ekologią [Why did I stop to deal with ecology?] – (In: Akarologia polska u progu nowego tysiąclecia [Polish Acarology on the threshold of a new millennium] Ed. S. Ignatowicz) – Wyd. SGGW, Warsaw, pp. 193–201.
• Niedbała W., Blaszak C., Błoszyk J., Kaliszewski M., Kaźmierski A. 1981 – Roztocze (Acri). Zoocenologiczne podstawy kształtowania środowiska przyrodniczego osiedla mieszkaniowego Białoleka Dworska w Warszawie. Cześć I. Skład gatunkowy i struktura fauny terenu projektowanego osiedla mieszkaniowego. [Mites (Acari). Structure of soil mite (Acari) communities in urban green of Warsaw.] – Fragm. Faun. (Wars) 26: 105–156.
• Niedbała W., Błoszyk J., Kaliszewski M., Kaźmierski A., Olszanowski Z. 1990 – Structure of soil mite (Acari) communities in urban green of Warsaw – Fragm. Faun. Wars) 33: 21–44.
• Norton R.A. 1990 – Acarina: – Oribatida (In: Soil biology guide, Ed. D.L. Dindal) – Wiley, J. Toronto, pp. 779–803.
• Ojala R., Huhta V. 2001 – Dispersal of microarthropods in forest soil – Pedobiologia, 45: 443–450.
• Olejniczak I. 2004 – Communities of soil microarthropods with specials reference to Collembola in midfield shelterbelts – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 123–133.
• Olszanowski Z., Rajski A., Niedbała W. 1996 – Catalogus faunae Poloniae 54. Acari. Oribatida – PAN, Muzeum I Instytut Zoologii, Sorus, Poznan, 268 pp.
• Øygarden L., Grønlund A. 2003 – Indicators for soil erosion in Norway – OECD Expert Meeting on Soil Erosion and Soil Biodiversity Indicator, Rome, March 2003 http://webdomino1.oecd.org/comnet/agr/soil_ero_bio.nsf/viewHtml/index/$FILE/Publication.htm.
• Paoletti M.G. 1988 – Soil invertebrates in cultivated and uncultivated soil in northeastern Italy – Redia, 71: 501–563.
• Paoletti M.G. 1999 – Using bioindicators based on biodiversity to assess landscape sustainability – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 74: 1–18.
• Paoletti M.G., Bressan M. 1996 – Soil invertebrates as bioindicators of human disturbance – Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 15: 21–62.
• Parisi V., Menta C., Gardi C., Jacomini C. 2003 – Evaluation of soil quality and biodiversity in Italy: The Biological Quality of Soil Index (BQS) approach – OECD Expert Meeting on Soil Erosion and Soil Biodiversity Indicators, Rome, March 2003, http://webdomino1.oecd.org/comnet/agr/soil_ero_bio.nsf/viewHtml/index/$FILE/Publication.htm.
• Peachey R.E., Moldenke A., William R.D., Berry R., Ingham E., Groth E. 2002 – Effect of cover crops and tillage system on symphylan (Symphyla: Scutigerella immaculata, Newport) populations and Pergamasus quisquiliarum Canestrini (Acari: Mesostigmata) populations, and other soil organisms in agricultural soils – Appl. Soil Ecol. 21: 59–70.
• Pokarzhevskii A.D., Van Straalen N.M., Filimonova Z.V., Zaitsev A.S., Butovskii R.O. 2000 – Trophic structure of ecosystems and ecotoxicology of soil organisms – Russ. J. Ecol. 31: 190–197.
• Proctor H.C., Montgomery K.M., Rosen K.E., Kitching R.L. 2002 – Are tree trunks habitats or highways? A comparison of oribatid mite assemblages from hoop-pine bark and litter – Aust. J. Entomol. 41: 294–299.
• Rajski A. 1961 – Studium ekologiczno-faunistyczne nad mechowcami (Acari, Oribatei) w kilku zespolach roslinnych. I. Ekologia. [Faunistic-ecological investigations on moss mites (Acari, Oribatei) in several plant associations. I. Ecology.] – Soc. Friends Sci. (Poznan), Biology 25, 161 pp.+14 tables.
• Renker C., Otto P., Schneider K., Zimdars B., Maraun M., Buscot F. 2005 – Oribatid mites as potential vectors for soil microfungi: Study of mite-associated fungal species – Microbial Ecol. 50: 518–528.
• Römbke J., Breure A.M., Mulder C., Rutgers M. 2005 – Legislation and ecological quality assessment of soil: implementation of ecological indication systems in Europe – Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 62: 201–210.
• Römbke J., Sousa J.-P., Schouten T., Riepert F. 2006. Monitoring of soil organisms: a set of standardized field methods proposed by ISO – Eur. J. Soil Biol. 42: S61–S64, Suppl. 1.
• Ruf A. 1998 – A maturity index for predatory soil mites (Mesostigmata: Gamasina) as an indicator of environmental impacts of pollution on forest soils – Appl. Soil. Ecol. 9: 447–452.
• Ruf A., Beck L., Dreher P., Hund-Rinke K., Römbke J., Spelda J. 2003 – A biological classification concept for the assessment of soil quality: ‘‘biological soil classification scheme’’ (BBSK) – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98: 263–271.
• Ruf A., Beck L. 2005 – The use of predatory soil mites in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts, with perspectives for oribatid mites – Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 62: 290–299.
• Scheu S., Schulz E. 1996 – Secondary succession, soil formation and development of a diverse community of oribatids and saprophagous soil macro-invertebrates – Biodivers. Conserv. 5: 235–250.
• Schneider K., Migge S., Norton R.A., Scheu S., Langel R., Reineking A., Maraun M. 2004 – Trophic niche differentiation in soil microarthropods (Oribatida, Acari): Evidence from stable isotopr ratios (15N/14N) – Soil Biol. Biochem. 36: 1769–1774.
• Schneider K., Maraun M. 2005 – Feeding preferences among dark pigmented fungal taxa (“Dematiacea”) indicate limited trophic niche differentiation of oribatid mites (Oribatida, Acari) – Pedobiologia, 49: 61–67.
• Schneider K., Renker C., Maraun M. 2005 – Oribatid mite (Acari, Oribatida) feeding on ectomycorrhizal fungi – Mycorrhiza, 16: 67–72.
• Schulz E., Scheu S. 1994 – Oribatid mite mediated changes in litter decomposition: model experiments with 14C-labelled holocellulose – Pedobiologia, 38: 344–352.
• Schnürer J., Clarholm M., Bastrom S., Rosswall T. 1986 – Effects of moisture on soil microorganisms and nematodes: A field experiment – Microbial Ecol. 12: 217–230.
• Schweizer J. 1961 – Die Landmilben deer Schweiz (mittelland, Jura und Alpen). Parasitiformes Reuter – Denkschr. Schweiz. Naturf. Ges. 84: 184–185.
• Seniczak S., Kaczmarek S., Klimek A. 1991a – Akarofauna glebowa (Acari) wybranych zadrzewien srodpolnych okolic Turwi, II [The fauna of mites (Acari) in some spinneys in the Turew environs, II] – Zeszyty Naukowe – Zootechnika (Bydgoszcz) 176: 111–123.
• Seniczak S., Kaczmarek S., Rytinska-Nowak H., Socha T. 1991b – Wplyw krzewow I roslinnosci runa na akarofaune glebowa (Acari) zadrzewien srodpolnych okolic Turwi, II [The influence of bush and herb layers of spinneys on the fauna of mites (Acari) in the Turew environs, I] – Zeszyty Naukowe – Zootechnika (Bydgoszcz) 176: 141–155.
• Seniczak S., Gulvik M., Seniczak A., Chachaj B. 2007 – The soil Oribatida (Acari) of wooded hay meadow in Sogn, Norway – Proceedings of 8th Central European Workshop on Soil Zoology, April 20–22, 2005, České Budejovice.
• Sgardelis S.P., Usher M.B. 1994 – Responses of soil Cryptostigmata across the boundary between a farm woodland and an arable field – Pedobiologia, 38: 36–49.
• Siepel H. 1994 – Life-history tactics of soil microarthropods – Biol. Fertil. Soils, 18: 263–278.
• Siepel H. 1995 – Application of microarthropod life-history tactics in nature management and ecotoxicology – Biol. Fertil. Soils, 19: 75–83.
• Siepel H. 1996 – Biodiversity of soil microarthropods: the filtering of species – Biodivers. Conserv. 5: 251–260.
• Siepel H., de Ruiter-Dijkman E.M. 1993 – Feeding guilds of oribatid mites based on their carbohydrase activities – Soil Biol. Biochem. 25: 1491–1497.
• Siepel H., Maaskamp F. 1994 – Mites of different feeding guilds affect decomposition of organic matter – Soil Biol. Biochem. 26: 1389–1394.
• Skartveit J., Solhøy T., Pommeresche R., Stary J., Hauge E., Klausen F.E. 2002 – Edderkoppdyr (In: Miljøregistrering i skog – biologisk mangfold. Hovedrapport, Eds. I. Gjerde, C. Baumann) – Skogforsk, Ås. pp. 75–79.
• Skubała P. 2004 – Colonisation and development of oribatid mite communities (Acari: Oribatida) on post-industrial dumps – Wyd. Uniwersytetu Slaskiego, Katowice, 207 pp.
• Skubała P., Gulvik M. 2005 – Pioneer oribatid mite communities (Acari: Oribatida) in natural (glacier foreland) and anthropogenic (post-industrial dumps) habitats – Pol. J. Ecol. 53: 105–111.
• Słomian S. 2002 – The analysis of the Mesostigmata (Arachnida, Acari) mite communities in the “Bukowa Gora” Reserve (In: Postepy polskiej akarologii [Polish Acarology on the threshold of a new millennium] Ed. S. Ignatowicz) – Wyd. SGGW, Warsaw, pp. 91–99.
• Slomian S., Gulvik M., Madej G., Austad I. 2005 – Gamasina and Microgyniina mites (Acari, Gamasida) in two traditional farms in Sogn og Fjordane, Norway – Norw. J. Entomol. 52: 39–48.
• Usher M.B., Davis P., Harris J., Longstaff B. 1979 – A profusion of species? Approaches towards understanding the dynamics of the population of microarthropods in decomposer communities – (In: Population Dynamics, Eds. R.M. Anderson, B.D. Turner, L.R. Taylor) – Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 359–384.
• van Straalen N.M. 1998 – Evaluation of bioindicator systems derived from soil arthropod communities – Appl. Soil Ecol. 9: 429–437.
• Wasylik A. 1975 –The mites (Acarina) of potato and rye fields in the environs of Choryn – Pol. ecol. Stud. 1: 83–91.
• Wasylik A. 1986 – Effect of pig liquid manure on the saprophagous Acarina of cultivated fields – Pol. ecol. Stud. 12: 179–195.
• Weigman G. 2002 – Morphological variability between and within populations of Tectocepheus (Acari, Oribatida, Tectocepheidae) from the velatus-complex in central Europe (In: Acarid phologeny and evolution: Adaptation in mites and ticks, Eds. F. Bernini, R. Nannelli, G. Nuzzaci, E. de Lillo) – Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 141–152.
• Werner M.R., Dindal D.L. 1990 – Effects of conversion to organic practices agricultural on soil biota – Am. J. Altern. Agric. 5: 24–32.
• Żyromska-Rudzka H. 1976 – The effect of mineral fertilization of a meadow on the oribatid mites and other soil mesofauna – Pol. Ecol. Stud. 2: 157–182.