Manipulacje na gametach i zarodkach ptakow

• Autorzy: Hrabia A , Shimada K. , Rzasa J.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Manipulations of avian gametes and embryos

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The techniques for gametes, embryos and genome manipulations are poorly developed in birds due at least in part to the difficulties of obtaining a sufficient number of oocytes for experiments and particular development of embryos. In the present study the possibilities of manipulations of avian gametes and embryos, such as multiple ovulations, in vitro ovulation and fertilisation, embryo culture and obtaining transgenic birds, are reviewed. Presently, it is possible to carry out (1) in vitro maturation, ovulation and fertilisation of avian oocytes, (2) embryo culture from one-cell to hatching, (3) producing of chimeras by using manipulated in vitro PGCs and BCs and (4) obtaining transgenic birds.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

superowulacja; manipulacje na embrionach; ptaki; zaplodnienie in vitro; owulacja in vitro; zwierzeta transgeniczne; embriony; komorki rozrodcze; hodowla in vitro; manipulacje na gametach

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: 63
• Numer: 06
• Strony: 632-634
• Opis fizyczny: s.632-634,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Hrabia A

• Akademia Rolnicza w Krakowie, al.Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow

autor

Shimada K.

autor

Rzasa J.

Bibliografia

• 1.Bednarczyk M.: Manipulacje komórkami embrionalnymi ptaków. Biotechnologia 2003, 60, 36-47.
• 2.Chapman S. C., Collignon J., Schoenwolf G. C., Lumsden A.: Improwed method for chick whole-embryo culture using a filter paper carrier. Dev. Dyn. 2001, 220, 284-289.
• 3.Etches R. J.: Manipulating the avian genome. Proc. Int. Cong. Bird Reprod., Tours 1999, 169-173.
• 4.Etches R. J., Verrinder Gibbins A. M.: Manipulation of the Avian Genome. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida 1993.
• 5.Etches R. J., Carsience R. S., Fraser R. M., Clark M. E., Toner A., Verrinder Gibbins A. M.: Avian chimeras and their use in manipulation of the avian genome. Poult. Sci. 1993, 72, 882-889.
• 6.Eyal-Giladi H., Kochav S.: From cleavage to primitive streak formation: A complementary normal table and new look at the first stages of the development of the chick. I General Morphology. Dev. Biol. 1976, 49, 321-337.
• 7.Gilbert A. B.: Female genital organs, [w:] King A. S., McLelland J. (red.): Form and Function in Birds. Academic Press, London 1979, 1, 237-360.
• 8.Howarth B. Jr.: An examination for sperm capacitation in the fowl. Biol. Reprod. 1971, 3, 338-341.
• 9.Howarth B.: Maturation of spermatozoa and mechanism of fertilization, [w:] Cunningham F. J., Lake P. E., Hewitt D. (red.): Reproductive biology of Poultry. British Poultry Science Ltd, Oxford 1984, 161-174.
• 10.Hrabia A., Takagi S., Shimada K.: Variable response to hormonal induction of multiple ovulation in quail. J. Poult. Sci. 2003, 40, 234-238.
• 11.Hrabia A., Takagi S., Ono T., Shimada K.: Fertilization and development of quail oocytes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Biol. Reprod. 2003, 69, 1651-1657.
• 12.Imai K.: Effects of avian and mammalian pituitary preparations on induction of ovulation in the domestic fowl. J. Reprod. Fert. 1973, 33, 338-341.
• 13.Ishii Y., Reese D., Mikawa T.: Somatic transgenesis using retroviral vectors in the chicken embryo. Dev. Dyn. 2004, 229, 630-642.
• 14.Ivarie R.: Avian transgenesis: progress towards the promises. Trends Biotach. 2003, 21, 14-19.
• 15.Johnson A. L., Leone E. W.: Ovine luteinizing hormone-induced steroid and luteinizing hormone secretion, and ovulation in intact and pregnant mare serum gonadotropin-prmed hens. Poult. Sci. 1985, 64, 2171-2179.
• 16.Kamihira M., Nishijima K., Iijima S.: Transgenic birds for the production of recombinant proteins. Adv. Biochem./Biotechnol. 2004, 91, 171-189.
• 17.Kochav S., Ginsburg M., Eyal-Giladi H.: From cleavage to primitive streak formation: A complementary normal table and a new look at the first stages of the development of the chick. II Microscopic anatomy and cell population dynamics. Dev. Biol. 1980, 79, 296-308.
• 18.Muramatsu T., Nakamura A., Park H. M.: In vitro electroporation: a powerful and convenient means of nonviral gene transfer to tissues of living animals (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 1998, 1, 55-62.
• 19.Mozdziak P., Petitte J. N.: Status of transgenic chicken models for developmental biology. Dev. Dyn. 2004, 229, 414-421.
• 20.Naito M., Nirasawa K., Oishi T.: Development in culture of the chick embryo from fertilized ovum to hatching. J. Exp. Zool. 1990, 254, 322-326.
• 21.Naito M., M., Sano A., Tagami T., Harumi T., Matsubara Y.: Efficient transfection
• of chicken blastoderms in vivo by lipofection and electroporation using green fluorescent protein gene as a marker. Anim. Sci. J. 2000, 71, 377-385.
• 22.Naito M., Sano A., Tagami T., Harumi T., Matsubara Y., Kuwana T.: Efficient gene transfer into early chicken embryos by electroporation of stage X blastoderms in vivo, applying electric pulses vertically to the blastoderm layer. J. Poult. Sci. 2002, 39, 292-301.
• 23.Naito M.: Genetic manipulation in chickens. World's Poult. Sci. J. 2003, 59, 361-371.
• 24.Nakanishi A., Iritani A.: Gene transfer in the chicken by sperm-mediated methods. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1993, 36, 258-261.
• 25.Nakanishi A., Utsumi K., Iritani A.: Early nuclear events of in vitro fertilization in the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1990, 26, 217-221.
• 26.Nakanishi A., Miyake M., Utsumi K., Iritani A.: Fertilizing competency of multiple ovulated eggs in the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1991, 28, 131-135.
• 27.Okamura F., Nishiyama H.: Penetration of spermatozoa into the ovum and transformation of the sperm nucleus into the male pronucleus in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus. Cell. Tissue Res. 1978, 190, 89-98.
• 28.Olszańska B., Malewska A., Stępińska U.: Maturation and ovulation of Japanese quail oocytes under in vitro conditions. Br. Poult. Sci. 1996, 37, 929-935.
• 29.Olszańska B., Stępińska U., Perry M. M.: Development of embryos from in vitro ovulated and fertilized oocytes of the quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). J. Exp. Zool. 2002, 292, 580-586.
• 30.Ono T., Murakami T., Mochii M., Agata K., Kino K., Otsuka K., Ohta M., Mizutani M., Yoshida M., Eguchi G.: A complete culture system for avian transgenesis, supporting quail embryos from the single-cell stage to hatching. Dev. Biol. 1994, 161, 126-130.
• 31.Perry M. M.: Nuclear events from fertilization to the early cleavage in the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). J. Anat. 1987, 150, 99-109.
• 32.Perry M. M.: A complete culture system for the chick embryo. Nature 1988, 331, 70-72.
• 33.Petitte J. N.: The avian germline and strategies for the production of transgenic chickens. J. Poult. Sci. 2002, 39, 205-228.
• 34.Sang H.: Transgenic chickens - methods and potential applications. Trends Biotech. 1994, 12, 415-420.
• 35.Sang H.: Prospects for transgenesis in the chick. Mech. Dev. 2004, 121, 1179-1186.
• 36.Waddington D., Gribbin C., Sterling R. J., Sang H. M., Perry M. M.: Chronology of events in the first cell cycle of the polyspermic egg of the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Int. J. Dev. Biol. 1998, 42, 625-628.
• 37.Tajima A.: Production of germ-line chimeras and their application in the domestic chicken. Avian Poult. Biol. Rev. 2002, 13, 15-30.
• 38.Tanaka K., Wada T., Koga O., Nishio Y., Hertelendy F.: Chick production by in vitro fertilization of fowl ovum. J. Reprod. Fert. 1994, 100, 447-449.