Wspolczesne problemy genetyki i hodowli drobiu wodnego

• Autorzy: Wezyk S , Cywa-Benko K.
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Over 2 billion ducks and about 224 million geese are kept all over the world under intensive and extensive systems for meat, eggs, fatted livers and plumage. On the basis of latest methods of population genetics, molecular genetics, cytogenetics and using various intraspecific and interspecies crossbreeding systems, the researchers from many countries are studying the genetic methods of waterfowl improvement. In an effort to protect the native breeds of ducks and geese from extinction, some countries began to implement the special projects to protect this valuable gene pool. A review of the literature published overthe past 2 years, i.e. since the 11th European Symposium on Waterfowl in Nantes (France, 8-10 September 1997) showed that goose and duck breeding is of the great importance to developing countries. The results of Taiwan studies indicate that there are especially favourable conditions for waterfowl breeding in Far East countries and in the South Pacific area, providing humans with an excellent and inexpensive source of animal protein. For the consumers in highly developed countries, geese and ducks are the source of gourment products such as fatted livers as well as the down.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

hodowla zwierzat; genetyka zwierzat; drob; drob wodny; krzyzowanie zwierzat; gesi; kaczki

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Postępy Nauk Rolniczych
• Rocznik: 2000
• Tom: 47
• Numer: 1
• Strony: 15-28
• Opis fizyczny: s.15-28,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Wezyk S

• Zaklad Hodowli i Produkcji Drobiu, Instytut Zootechniki, 32-083 Balice k.Krakowa

autor

Cywa-Benko K.

Bibliografia

• [1] Baulain U. 1997. Magnetic resonance imaging for the in vivo determination of body composition in animal science. Computers & Electronic in Agriculture 17(2): 189-203.
• [2] Becker I., Bilsing A. 1995. Untersuchungen zur Mutter-King Beziehung bei Moschusente (Cairina moschata). In „Aktuelle Arbeiten zur artgemessen Tierhaltung". Darmstad. Germany.
• [3] Bednarczyk M., Rosiński A. 1999. Comparison of egg hatchability and in vitro survival goose embryos of various origins. Poultry Sci. 78: 579-585.
• [4] Baeza E., Carville H., De Salichon M.R., Marche G., Leclerq B. 1997. Effect of selection over three and four generations on meat yield and fatness in Muscovy ducks. British Poultry Sci. 38(4): 359-365.
• [5] Bierschenk F., Gerken M., Petersen J. 1997. The behaviour of individually kept female breeder geese. lst report nesting and egg-laying behaviour. Archiv f. Geflügelkunde 61(1): 17-23.
• [6] Bintang I.A., Silalahi M., Antawidjaja T., Raharjo Y.C. 1997. Effect of various dietary nutrient density on the growth performance of local mute ducks and their crosses. J. Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner 2(4): 237-241.
• [7] Bochno R., Mazanowski A., Rymkiewicz J. 1998. Regression equations for estimating the meat and fat contents of duck carcasses with the weight of skin slice with subcutaneous fat and the weight of the remaining part of the carcass as basic independent variables. Acta Acad. Agricult. Tech. Olst. Zootechnica 48: 123-135.
• [8] Bochno R., Rymkiewicz J., Szeremeta J., Brzozowski W. 1998. Regression eqations in vivo estimation of the meat content of duck carcasses. Abstr. of X European Poultry Conference, Jerusalem: 108.
• [9] Bodi L., Meszaras E., ACS i., Kovacs M.K. 1996a. Prolificacy of Improved Hungarian and Grey Landes geese. 1. Spring laying cycle. Allatenyesztes es Takarmanyozas 45(5): 473-480.
• [10] Bodi L., Dobos A., Acs I., Kozak J., Kovacs M.K. 1996b. Prolificacy of Improved Hungarian and Grey Landes geese. 2. Second laying cycle. Allatenyesztes es Takarmanyozas 45(6): 581-588.
• [11] Bodi L., Mezes M., Acs I., Vada K., Kozak J., Karsai K.M., Vetesi 1998. Relations among diet and physiological parameters of three genotypes of geese. Abstr. of XI European Poultry Conf. Jerusalem: 106.
• [12] Bondarenko A.P. 1995. The effect of semen quality on fertilizing abilty of geese. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskij Byulleten 34: 26-30.
• [13] Cheng Y.S., Poivey J.P., Rouvier R., Tai C. 1996. Prediction of genetic gains in body weight, egg production nad shell qualily traits in the Brown Tsaiya laying ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Genetic, Selection, Evolution 28(5): 443-455.
• [14] Chou TouzhShang, Peh HuoCheng, Yeh LiTzu 1998. Changes of growth performances and blood constituents in growing geese. J. Chinese Society of Animal Sci. 27(2): 189-198.
• [15] Cipriani G. 1997. La partecipazione degli abbonati alla campagna per la salvaguardia di avicoli in pericolo di estimazione. Vita Campagna 15(2): 46-47.
• [16] Cossato M.M., Bagliacca M. Paci G., Avianzi C. 1996. Fertilizing ability of semen of the muscovy duck. Rivista di Avicoltura 65(12): 34-40.
• [17] Cywa-Benko K., Krawczyk J., Wężyk S., Bielińska H., Rosiński A. 1998. Application of body measurements for prediction of meatyield ingeese. Biul. Inf. IZV33(3)218: 5-l l.
• [18] Denjean B., Ducos A., Darre A., Pinton A., Seguela A., Berland H., Blanc M.F., Fillon V., Darre R. 1997. Karyotypes of Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) and Muscovy (Cairina moschata) ducks, and their hybrid. Revue de Medicine Veterinaire 148(8/9): 695-704.
• [19] Douarie M., Vignal A., Sourdioux M. 1997. Current prospect of molecular genetics research in poultry and prospects in waterfowl. Proc. of the XI European Symposium of Waterfowl, Nantes: 59-65.
• [20] Du WenXing, Yang MoCheng, Zhang ZengYuan, Tang Yu, Qian Xiao Jin 1996. Analysis of growth curves of three types of green goose. Jiangsu J Agric. Sci. 12 (2): 49-53.
• [21] Duong Xuan Tuen, Nguyen Cong Quoc. 1995. Studies on the performance of CV Super-M duck breed in the southern provinces in Vietnam. In „Exploring approaches to research in the animal sciences in Vietnam" Proc. of worshop, Jue. Pryopr W.J., Canberra. Australia ACIAR.
• [22] Edar E., Yabuku R., Takayama K., Nakanishi Y., Manda M., Watanabe S., Matsmnoto S., Nagakama A. 1996a. Comparative studies on behaviour, weeding and pest control of duck (mallard, Cerry Valley and their crossbred) freeranged in paddy fields. Japanese Poultry Sci. 33(4): 261-267.
• [23] Edar E., Yabuki R., Takayama K., Nakanishi Y., Manda M., Watanabe S., Nagakama A. 1996b. Comparative studies on the reproductive ability of ducks (mallard, Cheny Valley and their cross). Japanese Poultry Sci. 33(5): 321-237.
• [24] Forgo V., Peczely P., Do Thi Dong Xuan, Hargitai C. 1996. Role of thyroid hormones during spring maturation and at the beginning of the egg-laying period in female geese. Acta. Agronom. Hungarica 44(2): 177-190.
• [25] France J., Dijkstra J., Dhanona M.S. 1996. Growth function and their application in animal science. Annales de Zootechnie 45(SUPP1): 165-174.
• (26) Garachka M.T., Kasyanenka S. V. 1994. Meat composition of hybrid duckling. Vesti Akademu Agrarnykh Navuk Balarusi 3: 84-86.
• [27] Gille U., Salomon F. V. 1998. Muscle growth in wild anddomestic ducks. British Poultry Sci. 39(4): 500-505.
• [28] Górski J., Pietkiewicz M. 1998. The effect of crossbreeding of Muscovy drakes with meat duck on the eviscarted carcass weight and its fatness in crossbred. Abstr. of the X European Poultry Conf., Jerusalem: 68.
• [29] Górski J., Witak B. 1998. The effect of crossbreeding of Muscovy drake with meat duck on the eviscerated carcass weight and chest fleshing in crossbred. Abstr. of the X European Poultry Conf., Jerusalem: 68.
• [30] Haddon M. W. 1998. Introgressive hybridisation, ducks and ecoligical displacement. New Zealand J. of Zoology 25(3): 245-248.
• [31] Hennier D., Sellier N., Rousselot-Pailley D., Forgez P. 1995. Characterization of apoliproteins B-100, AI and C from plasma lipoprotein in goose, Anser anser. Evidence for a genetic polymorphism in ApoC-like apoliproteins. Europ. J. of Biochemistry 234(2): 586-591.
• [32] Harun M.A.S., Veeneklas R.J., Kainpen M.van., Mabassu M. 1998. Breeding biology of Muscovy duck Cairina moschata in natural incubation: the effect of nesting behaviour on hatchability. Poultry Sci. 77(9): 1280-1286.
• [33] Janan J., Bodi L., Rudas P., Kozak J., Bardos L., Karsai K.M. 1998. Thyroid hormones, retinoids, cholesterol and some blood proteins of geese bred for fatty liver. Abstr. of the X European Poultry Conf. Jerusalem: 111.
• [34] Jalil M.A., Ali A., Begun J., Islam M.R. 1997. Study on the performance of different genotypes of duck under village conditions. Asien-Australien J. of Animal Sci. 10(2): 192-195.
• [35] Jaszczak K., Rabsztyn A., Jaszczak J. 1996. Cytogenetic study of embryos in geese of preservable stock. Proc. of XII European colloquium on cytogenetic of domestic animals. Zaragoza. Archivos de Zootecnia 45(170-171 ): 229-231.
• [36] Karaca O., Altin T. 1997. The phenotypic and genetic parameters of egg yield and some egg characteristic in Pekin duck. Turk Veterinerlik ve Hayvancilik Dergisi 21 (4): 313-315.
• [37] Kober I., Seifart K.H. 1996. Influence of chromatin structure on accessibility and transcriptional regulation of the duck histone H5 gene. J. of Animal Breeding and Genetics 113(4/5): 243-253.
• [38] Kowalski A., Palyga J., Górnicka-Michalska W.M. 1998. Allelic polymorphism of histone H1. a in duck erythrocytes. Biochemical genetics 36(5/6): 183-191.
• [39] Kozak J., Bodi L., Janan J., Acs I., Karsai M. 1997. Improvement in the reproductive characteristic of Hungarian Upgraded and Grey Landes geese in Hungary. WPSAJ 53(2): 197-201.
• [40] Kriż L. 1997. Genetic resources of poultry in the Czech Republic. Proc. „Genofond hospodarskych zvirat". Agricultural University Brno: 69-74.
• [41] Książkiewicz J. 1997a. Utilization of various multiple regression equations to in vivo estimation meatness and fatness in seven week old male and female meat-type duck. Rocz., Nauk. Zoot. 24(4): 79-88.
• [42] Książkiewicz J. 1997b. Characteristic of meatness traits in six generations of ducks in conservative groups. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 6(1): 101-108.
• [43] Książkiewicz J. 1997c. Mean value, variation and repeatability of meat traits in six generations of ducks of different countries of origin. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot. 24(1): 45-57.
• [44] Laucher J., Ronfort C., Duchamp C., Cohen-Adad F., Barges S., Famut P., Quivet L., Legras C., Verdeier G., Barre H. l 996. Characterisation of cDNA encoding an alpha thyroid hormone receptor in Muscovy duckling. Poultry Sci. 75(12): 1531-1535.
• [45] Le T.T., Duong X.T., Nirasava K., Takahashi H., Funikava T., Nagamine Y. 1998. Genetic parameters of body weight from an exotic line of duck in Vietnam. Animal Sci. & Technology 69(2): 123-125.
• [46] Lee ShuenRong, King ChinLiang 1997. Improving of percentage of white plumage in Mule Ducks. J. Taiwan Livestock Research 30(3): 293-299.
• [47] Li HongXiang, Li QingFu, Zhang LanYin, Wang HaoYan, Li HongWei, De XiaoYan. 1996. Combaining ability for growth rate in different crosses of Huo geese. Chinese J. Anim. Sci. 32(3): 31-32.
• [48] Liu HsinTzu, Hu YiHoo. Wang ChengTaung, Lin LihYuan 1996. Sequences and comparison of duck mitochondrial DNA control regions. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 115(2): 209-214.
• [49] LuongTat Nho, Hoang VanTieu, Dang Thi Dung, Le Xuan Tho, Doan VanXuan, Nguyen Duc Trong. 1995. Growth and meat performance of CV Super-M dicks under two management systems in the Red River Delta. In „Exploring approaches to research in the animal sciences in Vietnam". Workshop in Hue. Edited by Piyor W.J., Canberra, Australia.
• [50] Maghi B.B., das M.K., Ghos T.K. 1996. Egg production performances of Khaki Campbell and deshi (desi) duck under different feeding management practices in Sundarbans, West Brngal. Indian J. Anim. Health 35(1): 83-86.
• [51] Mazanowski A., Bernacki Z. 1998. Results of oat fatterung of 17- and 24-week-old crossbred geese from genetic reserve flocks compared with White Koluda geese. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot. 25(4): 175-190.
• [52] McAuley D.G., Clugston D.A., Longcore J.R. 1998. Outcome of agressive interactions between American black duck and mallards during the breeding season. J. of Widlife Management 62(1): 134-141.
• [53] Nageswara A.R., Reddy V.R., Reddy V.R., Eshwariah K.A. 1998. Comparative performance of Khaki Campbell, Indian non-descriptive ducks and their reciprocal crosses during growing period. Indian. J. Poultry Sci. 33(1): 106-109.
• [54] Penkova T.V., Bodi L. 1995. The effect of genotype on liver geese. Allatenyesztes es Takarmanyozas 44(5): 403-409.
• [55] Pierko M., Szczepańczyk E., Melosik M. 1997. Body weight and skull size in drakes by hybridization of Muscovy and Pekin duck. Zesz. Nauk. Akademii Rolniczej, Szczecin, Zootechnika 34: 95-101.
• [56] Prasetyo L.H., Susanti T. 1997. Reciprocal crossing between Tegal and Mojosari ducks: Early growth and early egg production. Journal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner 2(3): 152-156.
• [57] Puchajda H., Famga A., Pudyszak K. 1997. Effect of silages on the yield and quality of meat from two lines of goose. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 6(4): 141-147.
• [58] Puchajda H., Faruga A., Pudyszak K., Hrouz J. 1998. Changes in performance of Bilgorajska geese from a closed flock in three consecutive years of laying. Zivocisna Vyroba 43(5): 197-201.
• [59] Rhodes O.E. Jr, Smith L.M. , Smith M.H. 1996. Relationships between genetic variation and body size in wintering mallards. Auk 113(2): 339-345.
• [60] Rosiński A., Bednarczyk M. 1997. Influence of genotype on goose egg hatchability. Arch. Geflügelk. 61(1): 33-39.
• [61] Rymkiewicz J., Bochno R. 1995. Weights of skin sample with subcutaneous fat and of the carcass minus the sample as independent variables in regression equations for estimating the fat and lean contents of goose carcasses. Acta Academiae Agriculturae ac Technicae Olstenensis, Zootechnica 45: 117-127.
• [62] Saitbatalov T. 1998. Getting new colour ducks. Abstr. of the X European Poultry Conf., Jerusalem: 69.
• [63] Saitbatalov T., Moldazhanov K.A. 1998. Duck selection for improvement of productivity qualities. Abstr. of the X European Poultry Conference: 69.
• [64] Sekhar D.R., Venkatramaiah A., Mitra A., Chaitanyain K., Rao C.H., Chand A.R. 1997. Genetic variance and covariance of some early traits in Khaki Campbell ducks. J. Poultry Sci. 32(1): 43-47.
• [65] Shanin K.A., Saleh K. 1997. Selection index for genetic improvement of body weight at marketing age in Pekin duckling. Arch. Geflügelk. 61(3): 126-130.
• [66] Shiau J. W., Tai J.J.L., Chen J.C., Huang H.C., Tai C. 1996. Studies on random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) of poultry. J. Taiwan Livestock res. 29(4): 317-330.
• [67] Slavenaite S., Srouga A. 1998. Genetic variability of waterfowl blood serum proteins in line breeding. Abstr. of the X European Poultry Conf., Jerusalem: 68.
• [68] Snapir N., Rulf J., Meltzer A., Gvaryahu G., Rozenboim I., Robinzon B. 1998. Testosterone concentration, testes weight and morphology of mule drakes (Muscovy drake x Khaki Campbell). British Poultry Sci. 39(4): 572-574.
• [69] Spieker J.O., Yuill T.M., Burgess E.C. 1996. Virulence of six strains of ducks plague virus in eight waterfowl species. J. Wildlife Diseases 32(3): 453-460.
• [70] Szabone E., Eizbet M. 1997. Changes in body measurements and the correlation of these with body weight from 0 to 16 weeks of age in geese. Allatenyesztes es Takarmanyozas 46(5): 409-414.
• [71] Szasz S., Bogenfürst F. 1998. Study of body fat content in Pekin, Muscovy and Mule duck. Abstr. of the X European Poultry Conf., Jerusalem: 53.
• [72] Tong FuDan, Shao AiPiPing, Li Ji., Lang JieJin 1997. Studies on the mechanism of the high laying performance of Shaoxing ducks. J. Zhejiang Agricultural University 23(4): 423-426.
• [73] Vognivenko L., Debrov V. 1997. Assessment of reproductin and productive ability of geese with different method of breeding. Visnik Agrarnoi Nauki 4: 63-65.
• [74] Wężyk S., Cywa-Benko K. 1996. Protecting native poultry breeds against extermination. Misset World Poultry 12(6): 17-18.
• [75] Wu KeLiang, Zhang YuanMing, Tian YouQing, Fu Jun 1996. Mathematical models of egg production curve for the Sichuan White goose. Acta Veterinaria et Zootehnica Sinica 27(1): 51-54.
• [76] ve ChangXing 1995. Methods for increasing productivity of geese. J. Fujian Agricultural University 24(5): 450-454.