Effect of inoculation on silage quality and rumen fermentation in dairy cows

• Autorzy: Laugalis J , Jatkauskas J. , Vrotniakiene V. , Zelvyte R. , Sederevicius A. , Monkeviciene I. , Makauskas S.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of a silage additive on maize silage fermentation and assess the relationship of silages with different levels of fermentation end-products to ruminal fermentation parameters and organic matter (OM) digestibility. The maize silage underwent two treatments: a) no additive (control silage), b) additive with Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilacticci and enzyme cellulase. The additive improved silage fermentative processes, preserved more water soluble carbohydrates, increased fermentation of lactic acid and decreased formation of ammonia-N. Two groups of analogous cows were formed: the cows (n = 10) of the control group were fed silage without additives, the cows (n = 10) of the experimental group the silage additive. Rumen fluid from cows was sampled. The silage additive improved fermentation processes in the rumen: the amount of volatile fatty acids, including propionic acid, increased as well as the total and lactate fermenting bacterial count and number of protozoa. The incubation of both grass hay and also silage with the rumen fluid from the cows receiving silage with inoculant and cellulase additive improved their OM digestibility.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cow; dairy cow; silage quality; rumen fermentation; inoculation; digestibility; organic matter; maize silage; biological silage preparation

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: 63
• Numer: 09
• Strony: 1057-1059
• Opis fizyczny: p.1057-1059,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Laugalis J

• Lithuanian Veterinary Academy, Tilzes 18, 47181 Kaunas, Lithuania

autor

Jatkauskas J.

autor

Vrotniakiene V.

autor

Zelvyte R.

autor

Sederevicius A.

autor

Monkeviciene I.

autor

Makauskas S.

Bibliografia

• 1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) International Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Analytical Communities, 481 North Frederic Avenue, Suite 500, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877-2417 USA 1995, 2.
• 2.Beauchemin K. A., Colombatto D., Morgavi D. P., Yang W. Z.: Use of exogenous fibrolitic enzymes to improve feed utilisation by ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 81, 37-47.
• 3.Besong S., Jackson J. A., Trammell D. S., Akay V.: Influence of supplemental chromium on concentrations of liver triglyceride, blood metabolites and rumen VFA profile in steers fed a moderately high fat diet. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84, 1679- -1685.
• 4.Betliev R. O.: ''Silos Feedtech®'' efektivnoe sredstvo povischenia produktivnovo deistvia silosa. Molotshnaja Promischlenost. 2006, 101-102.
• 5.Bezkorovainy A.: Probiotics: determinants of survival and growth in the gut. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 73, 399-405.
• 6.Czerniawska-Piatkowska E.: Milk yield composition of primaparous cows managed in Poland compared with their dams kept in Sweden. Medycyna Wet. 2004, 60, 1320-1322.
• 7.Cushnahan A., Mayne C. S., Unsworth E. F.: Effects of ensilage of grass on performance and nutrient utilisation by dairy cattle. 2. Nutrient metabolism and rumen fermentation. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 60, 347-359.
• 8.Giraldo L. A., Ranilla M. J., Tejido M. L., Carro M. D.: Effects of enzyme application method on in vitro rumen fermentation of tropical forages. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2004, 13, 63-66.
• 9.Gollop N., Zakin V., Weinberg Z. G.: Antibacterial activity of lactic acid bacteria included in inoculants for silage and in silages treated with these inoculants. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 98, 662-666.
• 10. Jatkauskas J., Vrotniakiene V.: Improvement of grass silage quality by inoculant with lactic bacteria and enzymes. Vet. Med. Zootech. Lithuanian Vet. Acad. Kaunas 2004, 28, 79-82.
• 11. Juozaitiene V., Kerziene S.: Biometrija ir kompiuterine duomenu analize. Lithuanian Vet. Acad., Kaunas 2001, p. 115.
• 12.Kleen J. L., Hooijer G. A., Rehage J., Noordhuizen J. P. T. M.: Subacute Ruminal Acidosis (SARA). J. Vet. Med. 2003, 50, 406-414.
• 13.Laugalis J., Monkeviciene I., Zelvyte R., Sederevicius A., Oberauskas V.: The investigation of anaerobic mikroflora species composition in the rumen cattle. Proc. conf. Animals Health Food Quality. Jelgava 2004, p. 161-167.
• 14.Laugalis J., Zelvyte R., Ramanauskiene J., Monkeviciene I., Sederevicius A., Makauskas S., Kantautaite J.: The investigation of the rumen microflora in dairy cows when they are fed according to different technologies. Vet. Med. Zootech. Lithuanian Vet. Acad. 2004, 25, 16-20.
• 15.Monkeviciene I.: Zoliniu ir stambiuju pasaru atrajotojams organines medziagos virskinamumo ir apykaitos energijos nustatymas I- stadijos in vitro metodu. Metodiniai nurodymai. Lithuanian Vet. Acad., Kaunas 1999, p. 11.
• 16.Moskalenko S. P., Kuznecov M. J.: Rubcovoe pischevarenie u karov pri kormlenii senazom, zagotovlenom v plenocnoi upakovke. Zootexnika 2003, 7, 11-12.
• 17.Naumann C., Bassler R.: Untersuchung von Silage. Bestimmung des Gehaltes an Essig-, Butter- und Milchsäure, [in:] VDLUFA-Methodenbuch Band III. Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt 1997.
• 18.Oberauskas V., Kantautaitë J., Sutkevièienë R., Sederevièius A., Monkevièienë I., Þelvytë R., Ramanauskienë J., Laugalis J., Kabaðinskienë A.: The investigations of the properties of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum U-14 and Lactobacillus fermentum U-5 strains and their evaluation during the lyophilization. Medycyna Wet. 2004, 60, 1278-1282.
• 19.Ozutsumi Y., Tajima K., Takenaka A., Itabashi H.: The Effect of Protozoa on the Composition of Rumen Bacteria in Cattle Using 16S rRNA Gene Clone Libraries. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2005, 69, 499-506.
• 20.Pustovoi V. K.: Gazoxromatograficeskoe opredelenie zirnix kislot v kormax i biologiceskix substratax selskoxoziasvenix zivotnix. Metodiceskie Rekomendacii, Borovsk 1978, 3-8.
• 21.Sederevicius A.: Diagnostiniai ir gydomieji zondai galvijams. Lithuanian Vet. Acad., Kaunas 2000, 3-9.
• 22.Sederevicius A.: Gyvunu organizmo skysciu fiziologiniai rodikliai. Lithuanian Vet. Acad., Kaunas 2004, 56-61.
• 23.Sederevicius A., Monkeviciene I., Zelvyte R., Zymantiene J., Girnius B.: Virskinimo fiziologija ir endokrinologija. II dalis. Virskinimas atrajotoju didziajame prieskrandyje. Lithuanian Vet. Acad., Kaunas 2001, p. 20.
• 24.Thomas T. A.: An automated procedure for the determination of soluble carbohydrates in herbage. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 1977, 28, 639-642.
• 25.Van Gylswyk N. O.: Enumeration and presumptive identification of some functional groups of bacteria in the rumen of dairy cows fed grass silage-based diets. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1990, 73, 243-254.
• 26.Venables W. N., Smith D. M.: An introduction to R. Notes on R: A programming environment for data analysis and graphics version 2.2.0. Cleveland 2005, 1-97.
• 27.Zernosek I. V., Kasirina L. G., Tunikov G. M.: Vlianie mexaniceskoi obrabotki korma na rubcovuju mikrofloru. Sbornik naucnix trudov. Riazan 1998, 68-69.