Interakcje miedzy procedurami ochrony zdrowia wymienia stosowanymi przed i po doju krow

• Autorzy: Wronski M , Jarmuz W. , Skrzypek R.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Interactions among pre-milking and post-milking procedures used in cows for protecting udder health

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of the interaction between methods of udder and teat cleaning before milking, the sequence of fore-stripping relative to udder and teat cleaning, and post-milking teat disinfection on somatic cell count and total microorganism count in bulk tank milk. The study was carried out in 2004 on 160 dairy farms (average 19.4 cows per herd), located in neighboring parts of the Mazowsze and Warmia and Mazury regions. It was found that the optimal combination of pre- and post-milking procedures is: fore-stripping, then pre-milking udder and teat wiping with a towel soaked with a disinfectant, and post-milking teat disinfection. However, in very dirty cows the most favorable combination is washing with water containing a disinfectant, followed by fore-stripping. In this case post-milking teat disinfection should not be employed, for the joint effect of this procedure and the specified method of pre-milking udder cleansing is negative in cold months (January-March and September-December), with no effect in other months.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

strzyki; bydlo; interakcje; ogolna liczba drobnoustrojow; dezynfekcja podojowa; czyszczenie; dezynfekcja przeddojowa; wymiona; metody; procedury; krowy mleczne; zdrowotnosc wymion; liczba komorek somatycznych; przedzdajanie; mleko

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: 64
• Numer: 03
• Strony: 327-331
• Opis fizyczny: s.327-331,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Wronski M

• Uniwersytet Warminsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie, ul.Oczapowskiego 5/137, 10-718 Olsztyn

autor

Jarmuz W.

autor

Skrzypek R.

Bibliografia

• 1. Barkema H. W., Schukken Y. H., Lam T. J. G. M., Beiboer M. L., Benedictus G., Brand A.: Management practices associated with low, medium, and high somatic cell counts in bulk milk. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81, 1917-1927.
• 2. Burmeister J. E., Fox L. K., Hancock D. D., Gay C. C., Gay J. M., Parish S. M., Tyler J. W.: Survey of dairy managers in the Pacific Northwest identifying factors associated with teat chapping. J. Dairy Sci. 1995, 78, 2073-2082.
• 3. Burmeister J. E., Fox L. K., Hillers J. K., Hancock D. D.: A comparison of two methods of evaluation of teat skin pathology. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81, 1904-1909.
• 4. Burmeister J. E., Fox L. K., Hillers J. K., Hancock D. D.: Effects of pre-milking and post-milking teat disinfectants on teat skin condition. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81, 1910-1916.
• 5. Cook C.: Teat preparation - remove the dirt, reduce the risks. Proc. British Mastitis Conference, Brockworth 2002, s. 51-57.
• 6. Dudko P.: Wpływ preparatów P3 Oxy Foam i BluRGard w czasie doju mechanicznego na jakość mikrobiologiczną mleka. Medycyna Wet. 2001, 57, 581-585.
• 7. Fox L. K., Nagy J. A., Hillers J. K., Cronrath J. D., Ratkovsky D. A.: Effects of postmilking teat treatment on the colonization of Staphylococcus aureus on chapped teat skin. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1991, 52, 799-802.
• 8. Fox L. K., Norell R. J.: Staphylococcus aureus colonization of teat skin as affected by postmilking teat treatment when exposed to cold and windy conditions. J. Dairy Sci. 1994, 77, 2281-2288.
• 9. Hemling T. C.: Teat condition - prevention and cure through teat dips. Proc. British Mastitis Conference, Brockworth 2002, s. 1-14.
• 10. Jayarao B. M., Pillai S. R., Sawant A. A., Wolfgang D. R., Hedge N. V.: Guidelines for monitoring bulk tank milk somatic cell and bacterial counts. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87, 3561-3573.
• 11. Johnson A. P.: A proper milking routine: the key to quality milk. Proc. National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting, Reno, Nevada 2000, s. 123-126.
• 12. Kamieniecki H., Wójcik J., Kwiatek A., Skrzypek R.: Czynniki oddziaływujące na jakość higieniczną mleka zbiorczego. Medycyna Wet. 2004, 60, 323-326.
• 13. Malinowski E.: Znaczenie dezynfekcji wymienia i rodzaje środków. Medycyna Wet. 2000, 56, 709-714.
• 14. Merrill W. G., Sagi R., Petersson L. G., Bui T. V., Erb H. N., Galton D. M., Gates R.: Effects of premilking stimulation on complete lactation milk yield and milking performance. J. Dairy Sci. 1987, 70, 1676-1684.
• 15. Nickerson S. C.: Teat end interactions with germicides. Proc. National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting, St. Louis, Missouri 1998, s. 67-72.
• 16. Pankey J. W.: Uptake on postmilking teat antisepsis. J. Dairy Sci. 1984, 67, 1336-1353.
• 17. Rasmussen M. D.: A review of milking preparation: the science. Proc. National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia 2000, s. 104-110.
• 18. Rasmussen M. D.: Overmilking and teat condition. Proc. National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting, Charlotte, North Carolina 2004, s. 169-175.
• 19. Reid D. A., Johnson A. P.: Trouble shooting herds with poor teat condition. Proc. National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting, Fort Worth, Texas 2003, s. 124-127.
• 20. Ruegg P., Rodriguez A. C.: Implementing milk quality programs on farms; lessons learned from "Milk Money". Proc. National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas 2007, s. 152-157.
• 21. Schaik G. van, Green L. E., Guzmán D., Esparza H., Tadich N.: Risk factors for bulk milk somatic cell counts and total bacterial counts in smallholder dairy farms in the 10th region of Chile. Prev. Vet. Med. 2005, 67, 1-17.
• 22. Skrzypek R., Wójtowski J., Fahr R.-D.: Hygienic quality of cow bulk tank milk depending on the method of udder preparation for milking. Arch. Tierz., Dummerstorf 2003, 46, 405-411.
• 23. Skrzypek R., Wójtowski J., Fahr R.-D.: Wpływ metody przygotowania wymienia i strzyków krów do doju na jakość higieniczną mleka. Medycyna Wet. 2004, 60, 1002-1005.
• 24. Svennersten-Sjaunja K.: The science behind milk ejection. Proc. National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting, Charlotte, North Carolina 2004, s. 215-228.
• 25. Yalcin C., Stott A. W., Logue D. N., Gunn J.: The economic impact of mastitis-control procedures used in Scottish dairy herds with high bulk-tank somatic-cell counts. Prev. Vet. Med. 1999, 41, 135-149.