Regeneracja i wzrost piwonii (Paeonia spp.) in vitro

• Autorzy: Gabryszewska E.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Regeneration and growth of peony (Paeonia spp.) in vitro

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Vegetative propagation of peony is usually carried out by grafting onto herbaceous peony roots (tree peony) or by dividing tuberous root clumps (herbaceous peony). However, conventional propagation is time-consuming and too slow for a large production and therefore in vitro methods have been developed. The regeneration ability of different organs of herbaceous and tree peony has been reported in this review. The role of exogenous and endogenous growth regulators in the differentiation and growth of shoots, roots and somatic embryos is presented. The problem of dormancy in the somatic embryos and in the shoots or plants propagated in vitro are also discussed.

PL

Wegetatywne rozmnażanie piwonii zielnych polega na podziale podziemnego kłącza zawierającego zgrubiałe korzenie marchwiaste, natomiast u piwonii drzewiastych szeroko stosowane jest rozmnażanie poprzez szczepienie zrazów na korzeniach piwonii zielnych. Ponieważ tradycyjne rozmnażanie trwa bardzo długo i jest mało efektywne, od wielu lat prowadzone są badania nad rozmnażaniem piwonii in vitro. Niniejsza praca zawiera przegląd literatury dotyczący zdolności regeneracyjnych eksplantatów pierwotnych izolowanych z różnych organów piwonii zielnych i drzewiastych. Omówiono rolę egzogennych i endogennych regulatorów wzrostu w procesie różnicowania i wzrostu pędów, korzeni oraz zarodków somatycznych. Przedstawiono również problem spoczynku u zarodków somatycznych oraz pędów i roślin rozmnażanych in vitro.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Agrobotanica
• Rocznik: 2004
• Tom: 57
• Numer: 1-2
• Opis fizyczny: s.5-19,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Gabryszewska E.

• Instytut Sadownictwa i Kwiaciarstwa, Pomologiczna 18, 96-100 Skierniewice, Polska

Bibliografia

• Barton L.V., Chandler C, 1957. Physiological and morphological effects of gibberellic acid on epicotyl dormancy of tree peony. Contrib. Boyce. Thomson Inst. 19: 201-214.
• Bouza L., Jacques M., Miginiac E., 1994a. In vitro propagation of Paeonia suffruitcosa Andr. cv. Mme de Vatry: developmental effects of exogenous hormones during the multiplication phase. Scientia Hort. 57:241 -251.
• Bouza L., Jacques M., Miginiac E., 1994b. Requirements for in vitro rooting of Paeonia suffruticosa Andr. cv. Mme de Vatry. Scientia Hort. 58: 223-233.
• Bouza L., Jacques M.,Sotta B., Miginiac E., 1994c. Relations between auxin and cytokinin contents and in vitro rooting of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.). Plant Growth Regul. 15: 69-73.
• Bouza L., Jacques M., Sotta B.,Miginiac E., 1994d. The reactivation of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.) vitroplants by chilling is correlated with modifications of abscisic acid, auxin and cytokinin levels. Plant Science 97:153-160.
• Buchheim J. A. T, Meyer M. M., 1992. Micropropagation of peony (Paeonia spp.). Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, 20. [In:] High-tech and micropropagation IV (Ed. Y.P.S.Bajaj), Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg: 269-285.
• Czarnecki W., 1976. Piwonie, PWRiL, Warszawa: str. 116.
• Gabryszewska E.,1998. The influence of cytokinins, thidiazuron, paclobutrazol and red light on shoot proliferation of herbaceous peony cv. ‘Jadwiga’ in vitro. Jour. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res., 3-4: 157-168.
• Gabryszewska E., 2001 a. Effects of ABA, fluridone and light quality on growth and dormancy of tissue-cultured herbaceous peony shoots. Acta Hort. 560: 407-410.
• Gabryszewska E., 2001b. The influence of GA₃ , paclobutrazol, light quality and temperature on the growth and dormancy release of peony (Paeonia L.) shoots in vitro. COST Action 843, Quality enhancement of plant production through tissue culture, Annual Meeting, 18-20 October 2001, Rome, Italy, (Abstr.) 82-83.
• Gabryszewska E.,Marasek A.,1997. Wpływ tidiazuronu na wzrost kalusa i regenerację pędów peonii (Paeonia x hybrida) in vitro. Zeszyty Nauk. Akad. Rol. w Krakowie 318: 177-181.
• Gildow F. E., Mitchell J. P., 1977. Initiation, growth and nuclear characteristics of tissue cultures of Paeonia suffruticosa. Physiol. Plant. 58: 790-795.
• Harris R. A., Mantell S. H., 1991. Effects of Stage II subculture durations on the multiplication rate and rooting capacity of micropropagated shoots of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.). J. Hort. Sci. 66: 95-102.
• Hosoki T., Ando M., Kubara T., Hamada M.,Itami M., 1989. In vitro propagation of herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.) by longitudinal shoot-split method. Plant Cell Rep. 8: 243-246.
• Kim Y. S, Lee B. K., 1995. Effects of plant growth regulators and culture temperature on embryo culture of Paeonia albiflora. Jour. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 36: 255-262.
• Kim Y.S, Lee B.K, 1996. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in cotyledon culture of Paeonia albiflora. Jour. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 37: 827-830.
• Kunneman B.P. A.M., Albers M.R.J., 1989. Tissue culture of peony is not yet producing plants. Bloembollencultuur 100: 16-17.
• Lee B. K., Ko J. A., Kim Y.S., 1992. Studies on the thidiazuron treatment of anther culture in Paeonia albiflora. Jour. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 33: 384-395.
• Li Y., Wu D., Pan S., Wei Z., Xu Z., Li X., 1984. In vitro propagation of Paeonia suffruticosa. Kexue Tongbao 29: 1675-1678
• Lin J. J., Thomas J. A., Meyer M. M., 1987. Tissue culture and embryoid formation in Paeonia lactiflora Pall. Am. Peony Soc. Bull. 263: 24-30.
• Meyer M. M., 1976a. Culture of Paeonia embryos by in vitro techniques. Am. Peony Soc. Bull. 217: 32-35.
• Meyer M. M., 1976b. Culture of Paeonia callus by tissue culture techniques. Am. Peony Soc. Bull. 218: 27-29.
• Murashige T., Skoog F., 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-497.
• Orlikowska T., Marasek A., Kucharska D., 1998. Regeneration of Paeonia mlokosewitschii Lorn, and P. tenuifolia L. in vitro from different explants. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 3-4: 223-227.
• Radtke G. W., 1983. Tissue culture of herbaceous peonies. Am. Peony Soc. Bull. 246: 19-23.
• Seyring M., 2000. Loss rate is still too high. TASPO-Gartenbaumagazin. 10: 30-31.
• Shannon J., Kamp J. R., 1959. Trials of various possible propagation methods of herbaceous peonies. Ill State Flor. Assoc. Bull. 197:4-7.
• Sidibe A., Feserova H., Tesarova M., 2000. Transfer of some plant species from in vitro to in vivo growth in the greenhouse conditions. Ann. Agric. Res. 21: 317-322.
• Thomas J. A., Meyer M.M., 1986.Tissue culture and anatomical studies of Paeonia lactiflora. HortScience 21: (Abstr.) 774
• Thomas J. A., Meyer M. M., 1987. In vitro embryogenesis and development of Paeonia lactiflora Pall. In Vitro 23: (Abstr.) 70A.
• Vasil’eva M. Y, 1976. The formation of renewal organs in herbaceous peonies. Ref. Zhumal 55: (Abstr.) 930.
• Wilkins H. F., Halevy A. H., 1985. Paeonia. [In:] Handbook of flowering IV (Ed. H.A. Halevy) CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 2-4.
• Zeng D.X.,Yin W.L.,Zhao X.Q.,Wang H. F., 2000. Propagation of Chinese tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.). Journal Beijing Forestry University 22: 90-95.
• Zilis M.R.,Meyer M.M., 1976. Rapid in vitro germination of immature, dormant embryos. Proc. Int. Plant. Prop. Soc. 26: 272-275.

Uwagi

PL