Analysis of team sports results based on the European basketball men’s championships

• Autorzy: Pluta B. , Andrzejewski M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Introduction. The paper is a univariate study examining the performance in professional basketball. The authors did not include the influence of situational variables that affects the game dynamics thus the aim of the conducted study was the sole analysis of the point results obtained from selected basketball games. Aim of Study. The main topic of the study was the analysis of the impact of rule modifications on match results in men’s professional basketball. Material and Methods. The research material consisted of numerical data on results of all matches played at men’s European Basketball Championships between 1935 and 2015. All statistical calculations were carried out using the STATISTICA software package. Six main basketball rule modifications which directly affected the course of matches were identified in chronological order. Results. The results of the study showed that subsequent changes of basketball rules not always directly affected a match score. The number of scored points and allowed points following each consecutive rule modification since 1956 changed significantly. The greatest changes in match scores were noted after having introduced the modifications of basketball rules from 1956 and 1984. Conclusions. Rule modification involves processes that seek change in the game conditions, thus modifications in basketball should also be validated after following a reflective process. The main purposes of any future rule modifications in basketball should be to improve players performance, respond more efficiently to commercial pressures and interests, and finally attract more prospective players.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Trends in Sport Sciences
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 25
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.21-27,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Pluta B.

• Department of Recreation, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznan, Poland

autor

Andrzejewski M.

• Department of Recreation, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Arias JL, Argudo FM, Alonso JI. Effect of the three point line change on the game dynamics in girls’ minibasketball. Res Quart Exerc Sport. 2009; 80(3): 502-509.
• 2. Arias JL, Argudo FM, Alonso JI. Review of rule modification in sport. J Sports Sci Med. 2011; 10: 1-8.
• 3. Cormery B, Marcil M, Bouvard M. Rule change incidence on physiological characteristics of elite basketball players: a 10-year-period investigation. Br J Sports Med. 2008; 42: 25-30.
• 4. Dean O. Basketball on paper. Rules and tools for performance analysis. Potomac Books, Inc., Washington, D.C., 2004.
• 5. Gómez MA, Lorenzo A, Sampaio J, Ibáñez SJ. Differences in game-related statistics between winning and losing teams in women’s basketball. J Hum Mov Studies. 2006; 51: 357-369.
• 6. Gómez MA, Lorenzo A, Sampaio J, Ibáñez SJ, Ortega E. Game-related statistics that discriminated winning and losing teams from the Spanish men’s professional basketball teams. Coll Antropol. 2008; 32(2): 451-456.
• 7. Gómez MA, Lorenzo A, Ortega E, Sampaio J, Ibáñez SJ. Game related statistics discriminating between starters and nonstarters players in Womens National Basketball Associationleague (WNBA). J Sports Sci Med. 2009; 8(2): 278-283.
• 8. Ibáñez SJ, Sampaio J, Feu S, Lorenzo A, Gomez MA, Ortega E. Basketball game-related statistics that discriminate between teams’ season-long success. Eur J Sport Sci. 2008; 8(6): 369-372.
• 9. Karipidis A, Fotinakis P, Taxildaris K, Fatouros J. Factors characterizing a successful performance in basketball. J Hum Mov Studies. 2001; 41(5): 385-397.
• 10. Krauss MD. Equipment innovations and rules changes in sports. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2004; 3: 272-276.
• 11. Kreivytė R, Čižauskas A. Differences of indicators in competitive performance between winning and losing teams in basketball. Ugdymas • Kûno Kultûra • Sportas. 2010; 2(77): 41-48.
• 12. Małolepszy T. Historia Mistrzostw Europy w koszykówce (History of European Basketball Championship). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 2009.
• 13. Maroti S. Study on three-point shots scored by teams ranked in the 1st-4th places in the Women Olympic Basketball Tournament, Beijing 2008. Palestrica Mileniului III ‒ Civilizaţie şi Sport. 2010; 11(2): 144- 147.
• 14. Melnick MJ. Relationship between team assists and win_loss record in the National Basketball Association. Percept Motor Skills. 2001; 92: 595-602.
• 15. O’Donoghue P. Research Methods for sport performance analysis. Routledge; London; 2010.
• 16. Oliver D. Basketball on paper. Rules and tools for performance analysis. Washinton, D.C., Brassey’s, Inc.; 2004.
• 17. Ortega E, Palao JM, Gómez MA, Lorenzo A, Cárdenas D. Analysis of the efficacy of possessions in boys 16-andunder basketball teams differences between winning and losing teams. Percept Motor Skills. 2007; 103: 961-964.
• 18. Pojskić H, Šeparović V, Užičanin E. Differences between successful and unsuccessful basketball team on the final Olympic tournament. Acta Kinesiologica. 2009; 3: 110-114.
• 19. Robinson G, O’Donoghue P. A weighted kappa statistic for reliability testing in performance analysis of sport. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2007; 7(1): 12-19.
• 20. Sampaio J, Ibáñez S, Lorenzo A, Gomez M. Discriminative game related statistics between basketball starters and nonstarters when related to team quality and game outcome. Percept Motor Skills. 2006a; 103(2): 486-494.
• 21. Sampaio J, Janeira M, Ibáñez SJ, Lorenzo A. Discriminant analysis of game related statistics between basketball guards, forwards and centers in three professional leagues. Eur J Sports Sci. 2006b; 6(3): 173-178.
• 22. Satern MN, Messier SP, Keller-McNulty S. The effects of ball size and basket height on the mechanics of the basketball free throw. J Hum Mov Studies. 1998; 16: 123-137.
• 23. Šeparović V, Nuhanović A. Latent structure of standard indicators of situational effectiveness in basketball in Bosnian league 6. Sport Sci Pract Aspects. 2008a; 5(1-2): 13-18.
• 24. Šeparović V, Nuhanović A. Nonstandard indicators of the offensive effectiveness in basketball and successfulness of basketball teams. Sport Sci. 2008b; 1(2): 7-11.
• 25. Simović S, Komić J. Analysis of influence of certain elements of basketball game on final result based on differetiant at the XIII, XIV and XV World Championship. Acta Kinesiol. 2008; 2: 57-65.
• 26. Shaper R. History of the Rules. International Basketball. Special Issue, Magazin of AIPS Basketball Commission and FIBA News Media Council. 1982; 2: 48-49.
• 27. Ströher M. Basketball 60 years of FIBA Rules. FIBA, München. 1992; 62-118.
• 28. Ströher M. Basketball: the rules: 1931-2000 including the very first playing rules from 1891. Int Basket Fed. 2001.
• 29. Trninic S, Dizdar D, Lukšić E. Differences between winning and defeated top quality basketball teams in final tournaments of European club championship. Coll Antropol. 2002; 26: 521-531.
• 30. Usabiaga O, Castellano J. A proposal to adapt game rules in scholastic sport. I Congreso de Deporte en Edad Escolar. Propuestas para un nuevo modelo, Valencia, Spain: Ayuntamiento de Valencia. Fundación Deportiva Municipal. 2005; 1-9.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.23829/TSS.2018.25.1-3