An attempt to introduce cultivation and planning measures into the decision-making process in order to improve water-retaining capacity of river catchments

• Autorzy: Mrozik K.D. , Przybyla C. T.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper analyzes the capabilities of introducing cultivation (conservation cultivation, direct sowing) and planning (afforestation, change of arable land and permanent grassland under intensive use into extensively used grassland, introduction of midfield tree planting, establishment of midfield boundary strips with perennial grasses and herbaceous plants, formation of buffer zones for surface water) measures in polish planning documents at local level due to the needs of flood control and drought prevention based on improvement of the natural water-retaining capacity of catchments. Analysis was conducted on an example of uniform water body of surface waters in the Odra River basin (Wielkopolska region) by the application of a GIS-based decision support system. Matrix of the decision-making process includes 9 factors (land use, size of fields, fall of land, inundation areas, water-retaining capacity, dominant component of runoff, drained areas, distance from waters, and Natura 2000 areas).

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 22
• Numer: 6
• Opis fizyczny: p.1767-1773,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Mrozik K.D.

• Department of Land Improvement, Environmental Development and Geodesy, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Piatkowska 94, 60-649 Poznan, Poland

autor

Przybyla C. T.

• Department of Land Improvement, Environmental Development and Geodesy, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Piatkowska 94, 60-649 Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. GWP. Catalyzing Change: A handbook for developing integrated water resources management (IWRM) and water efficiency strategies. Global Water Partnership: Stockholm, pp. 51, 2004.
• 2. CARTER J. G. Spatial planning, water and the Water Framework Directive: insights from theory and practise. Geogr. J. 173, (4), 330, 2007.
• 3. KUNDZEWICZ Z. W., ULBRICH U, BRÜCHER T., LECKENBUSCH G., MENZEL L., PRZYMUSIŃSKA I., RADZIEJEWSKI M., SZWED M. Summer floods in Central Europe – climate change track? Nat. Hazards 36, (1-2), 165, 2005.
• 4. LEHNER B., DÖLL P., ALCAAMO J., HENRICHS H., KASPAR F. Estimating the impact of global change on flood and drought risks in Europe: a continental, integrated assessment. Climatic Change 75, 273, 2005.
• 5. SOLOMON S., QIN D., MANNING M., CHEN Z., MARQUIS M., AVERYT K. B., TIGNOR M., MILLER H. L. (Eds.). Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, pp. 996, 2007.
• 6. EEA. Europe’s environment. The fourth assessment. European Environment Agency. Copenhagen, pp. 452, 2007.
• 7. PRZYBYŁA CZ., BYKOWSKI J., MROZIK K., NAPIERAŁA M. The Role of Water and Drainage System Infrastructure in the Process of Suburbanization. Annual Set The Environmental Protection 13, 769, 2011 [In Polish].
• 8. MROZIK K. The Impact of Soil Cultivation Methods on Retention Capacity of Kania River Basin. WasserWirtschaft 1-2, 75, 2012 [In German].
• 9. COM. Green Paper from the Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions “Adapting to climate change in Europe – options for EU action”. Brussels, 29.6.2007, 354 final, 2007.
• 10. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (L 327/1), 2000.
• 11. COM. White Paper from the Commission of the European Communities “Adapting to climate change: Towards a European framework for action.” Brussels, 1.4.2009, 147 final, 2009.
• 12. Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks (L 288/27), 2007.
• 13. PRZYBYŁA CZ., MROZIK K. Current problems of water management in agriculture based on the Kania river basin. Wiadomości Łąkarskie i Melioracyjne 1, 7, 2010 [In Polish].
• 14. KOWALCZAK P. Hierarchy of regional requirements of small-scale retention in the Warta catchment basin. IMGW: Warszawa, pp. 124, 2001 [In Polish].
• 15. The Act of 27 March 2003 on planning and spatial development (The Journal of Law of 2012, item 647 with later amendments) [In Polish].
• 16. HEŁDAK M., RASZKA B. Evaluation of the Local Spatial Policy in Poland with Regard to Suistainable Development. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 22, (2), 395, 2013.
• 17. HEŁDAK M., RASZKA B. Prognosis of the Natural Environment Transformation Resulting from Spatial Planning Solutions. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 20, (6), 1513, 2011.
• 18. EVERS M., KRAUSE K. -U., TRESSL S., RUBACH H. Innovative tools for flood-related spatial planning and integration of a PSS. Final part of the FLOWS-project] www.leuphana.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Forschungseinric htungen/ifus/FLOWS?Endbericht?TP.pdf/25.03.2010, 2006 [In German].
• 19. LUKASHEH A. F., DROSTE R. L., WARITH M. A. Review of Expert System (ES), Geographic Information System (GIS), Decision Support System (DSS) and their applications in landfill design and management. Waste Manage. Res. 19, 177, 2001.
• 20. JIN Z. Development of Transparent Knowledge-Based Spatial Decision Support System for decentralised Stormwater Management Planing – Case study: Selection of On-Site Stormwater Management Measures of Urban Catchments: Chemnitz and Emscher Region, Germany. Dissertation. Fakultät Bauingenieurwesen und Geodäsie, Universität Hannover, pp. 135, 2005.
• 21. SIEKER F., ZACHARIAS S., WILCKE D., SCHMIDT W. A., SIEKER H., MERTA M. Preventive flood protection by water retention in the area. The example of the river basin of the Mulde in Saxony. GWF Wasser, Abwasser 149, (5), 404, 2008 [In German].
• 22. THIEL E., SCHMIDT W. A. Improved approaches for water and material flow management in intensively used small watersheds on the basis of integrated benefit and risk assessments (WSM300). Final report of project case study Drinking water reservoir Saidenbach (Erzgebirge). Sächsische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft: Leipzig, pp. 148, 2005 [In German].
• 23. RÖDER M., LÜTZ M., GERBER S. Assessment of Land Use Scenarios Development for Flood Mitigation. Wasserwirtschaft 1-2, 49, 2008 [In German].
• 24. WEIß A., THEOBALD S. Contribution of Agriculture to Reduce Floods. Wasserwirtschaft 4, 33, 2009 [In German].
• 25. RÜTER S., REICH M. Multifunctional measures to combine flood protection and nature conservation in agricultural watersheds. in: Hermann, Dabbert and Krimmly (Ed.) Flood protection with stake holders in small catchments, 2007.
• 26. PESCHKE G., ETZENBERG C., MÜLLER G., ZI MMERMAN S. The knowledge-based system FLAB – a tool for computer-aided determination of landscape units of the same runoff. IHI-Schriften. 10, 1999 [In German].
• 27. MERTA M., SEIDLER C., HELLIE F., UHLENBROOK S., TILCH N., ZILLGENS B., KIRNBAUER R. The knowledge-based system FLAB as a tool for process-related spatial organization of mesoscale catchments. In: KlimaWasser-Flussgebietsmanagement – im Lichte der Flut. Kleeberg (Ed.). Beiträge zum Tag der Hydrologie am 20-21. März 2003 in Freiburg. Forum für Hydrologie und Wasserwirtschaft. 1, 171, 2003 [In German].
• 28. SEIDLER C. MERTA M. Process and scale-based collection and modeling of the formation of fast runoff components. Final Report on the DFG project “Runoff and catchment modelling.” Internationales Hochschulinstitut Zittau, 2005 [In German].
• 29. MARCINEK J., KOMISAREK J. (Eds.). Soil classification in Poland. 1st version of the 5th edition. Poznań, pp. 216, 2008 [In Polish].
• 30. SPONAGEL H., GROTTENTHALLER W., HARTMANN K.-J., HARTWICH R. JANETZKO P., JOISTEN H., KÜHN D., SABEL K.-J., TRAIDL R. Mapping soil science. Hannover, pp. 438, 2005 [In German].
• 31. GENUCHTEN VAN M. T. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 892, 1980.
• 32. ZACHARIAS S., WESSOLEK G. Excluding organic matter content from pedotransfer predictors of soil water retention. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 71, 43, 2007.
• 33. CHU X., MARIŇO M. A. Determination of ponding condition and infiltration into layered soils under unsteady rainfall. J. Hydrol. 313, 195, 2005.
• 34. BOGDANOWICZ E., STACHÝ J. Systems for the calculation of maximum probable precipitation in Poland. Part 1. Water Management 9, 274, 1997 [In Polish].
• 35. BANASIK K., GÓRSKI D., IGNAR S. Modeling of precipitation overbank flows and quality of runoff from small unobserved agricultural catchments. SGGW: Warszawa, pp. 75, 2000 [In Polish].
• 36. The Act of 18 July 2001 The Water Act (The Journal of Law of 2012, item 145, with later amendments) [In Polish].
• 37. PZPWW. Spatial development plan for the Wielkopolskia province. WBPP: Poznan, pp. 314 + appendix, 2010 [In Polish].
• 38. KPZK 2011. National concept for spatial development 2030. (The Journal of Law “Monitor Polski” of 2012, item 252), 2011 [In Polish].
• 39. Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) (L 108/1), 2007.