Ultrasonografia wzmacniana kontrastem (CEUS) - zasada działania, środki kontrastowe

• Autorzy: Nowicki M. , Wdowiak M. , Rychlik A. , Nieradka R. , Kander M.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS): Principles and contrast agents

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Ultrasonography is an imaging technique universally employed in veterinary medicine. It has many advantages, such as high availability, non-invasiveness, short examination time, no anesthesia, and low cost, but also some drawbacks, like low specificity. To overcome these limitations, ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) and specific ultrasound contrast techniques have been developed. The application of UCAs and specific sonographic contrast techniques increase the specificity and sensitivity of ultrasound examination. Nowadays the new contrast-specific imaging techniques enable the separation of the linear tissue signal from the non-linear microbubble signal, which, combined with the introduction of second-generation UCAs, makes contrast-enhanced ultrasonography a very important diagnostic tool.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

weterynaria; diagnostyka; ultrasonografia; ultrasonografia wzmocniona kontrastem; srodki cieniujace

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 67
• Numer: 09
• Opis fizyczny: s.609-612,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Nowicki M.

• Katedra Diagnostyki Klinicznej, Wydział Medycyny Weterynaryjnej, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie, ul.Oczapowskiego 14, 10-719 Olsztyn

autor

Wdowiak M.

autor

Rychlik A.

autor

Nieradka R.

autor

Kander M.

Bibliografia

• 1.Allen M., Pellikka P., Villarraga H., Klarich K., Foley D., Mulvagh S., Seward J.: Harmonic imaging: echocardiographic enhanced contrast intensity and duration. Int. J. Cardiovas. Imag. 1999, 15, 215-220.
• 2.Bahr A., Wrigley R., Salman M.: Quantitative evaluation of imagent as an abdominal ultrasound contrast medium in dogs. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2000, 41, 50-55.
• 3.Gaschen L., Schur D., Kearney M.: Contrast harmonic ultrasound imaging of the normal pancreas and pancreatitis in dogs. Proc. Am. Coll. Vet. Radiol. Ann. Sci. Meeting, Chicago 2007, s. 21.
• 4.Goldberg B. B., Liu J. B., Forsberg F.: Ultrasound contrast agents: a review. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1994, 20, 319-333.
• 5.Gramiak R., Shah P. M.: Echocardiography of the Aortic Root. Invest. Radiol. 1968, 3, 356.
• 6.Haers H., Saunders J.: Review of clinical characteristics and applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2009, 234, 460-470.
• 7.Haers H., Vignoli M., Paes G., Rossi., Taeymans O., Daminet S., Suanders J.: Contrast Harmonic Ultrasonographic Appearance of Focal Space-occupying Renal Lesions. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2010, 51, 516-522.
• 8.Hause A., Kiefer I., Succow D., Bosch B., Oechtering G.: Hepatic transit time of the signal enhancer SonoVue in the dog. Proc. Int. Vet. Radiol. Assoc. Meeting, Vancouver 2006, 38.
• 9.Ivancic-Arndt M., Seiler G.: Contrast Harmonic Ultrasound of Splenic Hemangiosarcoma and Associated Liver Nodules in Dogs. Proc. Am. Coll. Vet. Radiol. Ann. Sci. Meeting, Chicago 2007, s. 19.
• 10.Kinns J., Aronson L., Hauptman J., Seiler G.: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Of The Feline Kidney. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2010, 51, 168-172.
• 11.Kremkau F. W., Gramiak R., Carstensen E. L., Shah P. M., Kramer D. H.: Ultrasonic Detection of Cavitation at Catheter Tips. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1970, 110, 177-183.
• 12.Nyman H., Kristensen A., Kjelgaard-Hansen M., McEvoy F.: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in normal canine liver. Evaluation of imaging and safety parameters. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2005, 46, 243-250.
• 13.O'Brien R. T.: Improved detection of metastatic hepatic hemangiosarcoma nodules with contrast ultrasound in three dogs. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2007, 48, 146-148.
• 14.O'Brien R. T., Holmes S. P.: Recent advances in ultrasound technology. Clin. Tech. Small Anim. Pract. 2007, 22, 93-103.
• 15.O'Brien R. T., Iani M., Matheson J., Delaney F., Young K.: Contrast harmonic ultrasound of spontaneous liver nodules in 32 dogs. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2004, 45, 547-553.
• 16.Ohlerth S., Dennler M., Rüefli E., Hauser B., Poirier V., Siebeck N., Roos M., Kaser-Hotz B.: Contrast Harmonic Imaging Characterization of Canine Splenic Lesions. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2008, 22, 1095-1102.
• 17.Ohlerth S., Rüefli E., Poirier V., Ross M., Kaser-Hotz B.: Contrast harmonic imaging of the normal canine spleen. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2007, 48, 451-456.
• 18.Ohlerth S., Rüefli E., Rohrer Bley C., Sieber-Ruckstuhl N., Melzer K., Kaser-Hotz B.: Assessment of tissue perfusion in the normal canine spleen with contrast harmonic imaging. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2005, 47, 110.
• 19.Quaia E.: Contrast-specific ultrasound techniques. Radiol. Med. 2007, 112, 482-486.
• 20.Rademacher N., Ohlerth S., Doherr M. G., Gaschen L., Stoffel M. H., Lang J.: Doppler sonography of the medial arterial blood supply to the coxofemoral joints of 36 medium to large breed dogs and its relationship with radiographic signs of joint disease. Vet. Rec. 2005, 156, 305-309.
• 21.Rademacher N., Ohlerth S., Scharf G., Laluhova D., Sieber-Ruckstuhl N., Alt M., Ross M., Grest P., Kaser-Hotz B.: Contrast-enhanced Power and Color Doppler ultrasonography of the pancreas in helathy and diseased cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2008, 22, 1310-1316.
• 22.Salwei R. M., O'Brien R. T., Matheson J. S.: Characterisation of lymphomatous lymph nodes in dogs using contrast harmonic and Power Doppler ultrasound. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2005, 46, 411-416.
• 23.Stewart V. R., Sidhu P. S.: New directions in ultrasound: microbubble contrast. Br. J. Radiol. 2006, 79, 188-194.
• 24.Waller K. R., O'Brien R. T., Zagzebski J. A.: Quantitative contrast ultrasound analysis of renal perfusion in normal dogs. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2007, 48, 373-377.
• 25.Wdowiak M., Rychlik A., Nieradka R., Nowicki M.: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in canine liver examination. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2010, 13, 767-773.
• 26.Yamaya Y., Niizeki K., Kim J., Entin P., Wagner H., Wagner P. D.: Anaphylactoid response to Optison(R) and its effects on pulmonary function in two dogs. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2004, 66, 1429-1432.
• 27.Yanagisawa K., Moriyasu F., Miyahara T., Yuki M., Iijima H.: Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by Kupffer cells. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2007, 33, 318-325.
• 28.Ziegler L. E., O'Brien R. T., Waller K. R., Zagrzebski J. A.: Quantitative contrast harmonic imaging of normal canine liver. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2003, 44, 451-454.