Composting of greenhouse tomato plant residues, wheat straw, and separated dairy manure, and the effect of free air space on the process

• Autorzy: Kulcu R.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study investigated the optimum mixture ratio of greenhouse tomato plant residues, wheat straw, and separated dairy manures for composting. Five 127-L laboratory-scale bioreactors were used to investigate the effect of separated dairy manure addition on the composting process of a tomato plant residues-wheat straw mixture. The wastes were mixed at 5 different ratios during the trials and were then placed in the reactor. Whereas the C/N ratios of the material mixtures placed in the reactors were fixed at a level of about 31, the FAS values ranged between 24.56% and 32.64%. Temperature and CO2 measurements were made from the reactors during the trials along with organic matter and moisture content analyses. According to the results, the optimum mixture ratio for composting the experimental materials was found to be 60% tomato waste, 10% wheat straw, and 30% separated manures on a dry basis. The FAS ratio of this mixture was 30.22%.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 23
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.1341-1346,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kulcu R.

• Department of Farm Machinery, Faculty of Agriculture, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. KULCU R., YALDIZ O. Determination of Aeration Rate and Kinetics of Composting Some Agricultural Wastes. Bioresource Technol. 93, 49, 2004.
• 2. ZORPAS A. A., KAPETANIOS E., ZORPAS G. A., KARLIS P., VLYSSIDES A., HARALAMBOUS I., LOIZIDOU M. Compost produced from organic fraction of municipal solid waste, primary stabilized sewage sludge and natural zeolite. J. Hazard. Mater. 77, 149, 2000.
• 3. KULCU R., YALDIZ O. Composting dynamics and opti­mum mixture ratio of chicken manure and vineyard wastes. Waste Manage. Res. 23, 101, 2005.
• 4. DIAZ L. F., SAVAGE G. M., EGGERTH L.L., GOLUEKE C.G. Composting and Recycling Municipal Solid Waste, Lewis Publishers, Florida, pp. 320, 1993.
• 5. POLPRASERT C. Organic Waste Recycling: Technology 17. and Management, second ed. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 69-113, 1996.
• 6. NEGRO M. J., SOLANO P. C., CARRASCO J. Composting of sweet sorghum bagasse with other wastes, 18. Bioresource Technol. 67, 89, 1999.
• 7. GEA T., BARRENA R., ARTOLA A., SÁNCHEZ A. Optimal bulking agent particle size and usage for heat reten- 19. tion and disinfection in domestic wastewater sludge com­posting. Waste Manage. 27, 1108, 2007.
• 8. DIAZ M. J., MADEJON E., LOPEZ F., LOPEZ R., CABR­ERA F. Composting of vinasse and cotton gin waste by using two different systems, Resour. Conserv. Recy. 34, 235, 2002.
• 9. PETRIC I., SELIMBASIC V. Composting of poultry 21. manure and wheat straw in a closed reactor: optimum mix­ture ratio and evolution of parameters, Biodegradation 19, 53, 2008.
• 10. RICHARD T.L., HAMELERS H.V.M., VEEKEN A., SILVA T. Moisture relationships in composting processes. Compost Sci. Util. 10, 286, 2002.
• 11. VEEKEN A., TIMMERMANS J., SZANTO G., HAMEL- ERS B. Design of passively aerated compost systems on basis of compaction-porosity-permeability data. ORBIT. pp. 24. 8596, 2003.
• 12. JERIS J.S., REGAN R.W. Controlling environmental para- 25. meters for optimum composting. Part II: Moisture, free air space and recycle. Compost Science 14, 8, 1973.
• 13. SCHULTZ K.L. Continuous thermophilic composting. 26. Compost Science 10, 108, 1962.
• 14. KULCU R., YALDIZ O. The Effect of FAS Parameter on 27. Composting of Grass And Leaf Wastes, 21th National Agricultural Mechanization Congress, Konya, Turkey, 2003. 28.
• 15. KULCU R., YALDIZ O. Composting of goat manure and wheat straw using pine cones as a bulking agent. Bioresource Technol. 98, 2700, 2007.
• 16. RUGGIERI L., GEA T., ARTOLA A., SANCHEZ A. 29. Influence of different co-substrates biochemical composi­tion on raw sludge co-composting. Biodegradation 19, 403, 2008.
• 17. MAULINI-DURAN C., ARTOLA A., FONT X., SÁNCHEZ A. A systematic study of the gaseous emissions from biosolids composting: raw sludge versus anaerobically digested sludge. Bioresource Technol. 147, 43, 2013.
• 18. JOLANUN B., TOWPRAYOON S. Novel bulking agent from clay residue for food waste composting. Bioresource Technol. 101, 4484, 2010.
• 19. TURKSTAT Turkish Statical Institute data basis- agricul­ture, http://www.tuik.gov.tr., 2012.
• 20. ALKOAIK F., GHALY A. E. Influence of dairy manure addition on the biological and thermal kinetics of compost­ing greenhouse tomato plant residues. Waste Manage., 26, 902, 2006.
• 21. ARSLAN E.I., ÜNLÜ A., TOPAL M. Determination of the Effect of Aeration Rate on Composting of Vegetable-Fruit Wastes, Clean - Soil, Air, Water 39, 1014, 2011.
• 22. APHA (American Public Health Association) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, APHA, Washington, DC, 541, 1995.
• 23. NAVARRO A.F., CEGARRA J., ROIG A., GARCIA D. Relationships between organic matter and carbon contents of organic waste, Bioresource Technol. 44, 203, 1993.
• 24. HAUG R. T. The Practical Handbook of Compost Engineering, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 717, 1993.
• 25. EPSTEIN E. The science of composting .Technomic Publishing Company, ISBN No: 1-56676-478-5, USA, 504, 1997.
• 26. SAS. SAS System for Windows, Release 6.11. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1995.
• 27. CKINLEY V.L., VEESTAL J.R., ERALP A. E. Microbial activity in composting. The Biocycle 26, 39, 1985.
• 28. BERNAL M.P., PAREDES C., MONEDERO M.A.S., CEGARRA J. Maturity and stability parameters of composts prepared with a wide range of organic wastes. Bioresource Technol. 63, 91, 1998.
• 29. PAREDES C., BERNAL M.P., CEGARRA J., ROIG A. Bio-degradation of olive mill wastewater sludge by its co-composting with agricultural wastes, Bioresource Technol. 85, 1, 2002.

Uwagi

rekord w opracowaniu