Farm families and future options-the role of the extension advisory service in shaping Irish agriculture

• Autorzy: McDonagh J. , Farrell M. , Mahon M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Quaestiones Geographicae
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 32
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.49-62,ref.

Twórcy

autor

McDonagh J.

• Department of Geography, School of Geography and Archaeology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

autor

Farrell M.

• Department of Geography, School of Geography and Archaeology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

autor

Mahon M.

• Department of Geography, School of Geography and Archaeology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

Bibliografia

• Alsos G.A., Carter S., 2006. Multiple business ownership in the Norwegian farm sector: resource transfer and performance consequences. Journal of Rural Studies 22: 313-322.
• Anderson J.R., 2008. Agricultural Advisory Services. Background Paper for World Development Report 2008. Agriculture for Development Department, the World Bank, Washington, DC.
• Barbieri C., Valdivia C., 2010. Recreation and agroforestry: Examining new dimensions of multifunctionality in family farms. Journal of Rural Studies 26(4): 465-473.
• Black A.W., 2000. Extension theory and practice: A review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40(4): 493502.
• Bogue P., 2004. An assessment of the Opportunities for Farm Families Programme. Rural Development Conference Proceedings 2004. Rural Economy Research Centre, Teagasc, Ireland.
• Bogue P., Phelan J., 2005. Advisory services in transition: The challenge of change. Paper presented at the AIAEE, 22nd Annual Conference Proceedings, Clearwater Beach, Florida, USA.
• Boyle G., 2012. Enhancing Irish agricultural productivity through technology adoption: a critique of the Irish agricultural, knowledge and innovation system (AKIS). In: Heanue K., Mackan-Walsh A., Maher P. (eds), Teagasc best practice in extension services. Conference Proceedings, Nov. 1st 2012, Teagasc: 1-6.
• Breen J., Hennessy T., Thorne F., 2005. Decoupled payments and the decision to produce. Rural Economy Research Centre, Teagasc, Working Paper Series, Working Paper 05-WP- RE-02.
• Burton R., Wilson G.A., 2006. Injecting social psychology theory into conceptualisation of agricultural agency: Towards a post-productivist farmer self identity? Journal of Rural Studies 22(1): 95-115.
• Carey D., 2004. The Teagasc extension advisory training service - the Irish public/private extension model. Paper presented at Association for International Agricultural and Extension Education Conference, Dublin.
• Central Statistics Office (CSO), 2004. Farm structure survey. Government Publications, Dublin, Ireland.
• Commins P., 1995. The European Community and Irish rural economy. In: Clancy P., Drudy S., Lynch K., O'Dowd L. (eds), Irish society: Sociological perspectives. Institute of Public Administration with Sociological Association, Dublin.
• Connolly L., Kinsella A., Quinlan G., Moran B., 2003. The National Farm Survey 2002. Teagasc: Rural Economy Research Centre, Athenry, Galway.
• Connolly L., Kinsella A., Quinlan G., Moran B., 2005. The National Farm Survey 2004. Teagasc: Rural Economy Research Centre, Athenry, Galway.
• Cristovâo A., Koehnen T., Portela J., 1998. Developing and delivering extension programmes. In: Swanson B.E., Bentz R.P., Sofranko A.J. (eds), Improving agricultural extension: A reference manual. UN Food and Agricultural Organisation, Rome: 57-65.
• Crowley E., 2003. The evolution of the Common Agricultural Policy and social differentiation in rural Ireland. Economic and Social Review 34(1): 65-85.
• Downey L., 2006. EU agri-food industries, rural economies by 2025. School of Agriculture, Food Science & Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin.
• Errington A., 1986. The delegation of decision on the farm. Agricultural Systems 19: 299-317.
• Farrell M., 2009. Embracing multifunctional agriculture in the Republic of Ireland: Towards a new extension ethic. Unpublished PhD Thesis, National University of Ireland, Galway.
• Farrell M., McDonagh J., 2012 The importance of evaluation - The case of the 'Options for Farm Families Programme' in Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 18(2): 105-120.
• Farrell M., McDonagh J., Mahon M., 2008. The Options for Farm Families: Rhetoric and reality of change. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education 15(3): 39-59.
• Feder G., Willett A., Zijp W., 2001. Agricultural extension: Generic challenges and the ingredients for solutions. In: Wolf S., Zilberman D. (eds), Knowledge generation and technical change: Institutional innovation in agriculture. Kluwer Publishers, Boston: 313-56.
• Frawley J., Keeney M., 1999. The impact of direct payments on farm income distribution. End of Project Report No. 4656, Teagasc, Dublin.
• Fulton A., Fulton D., Tabart T., Ball P., Champion S., Weath- erley J., Heinjus D., 2003. Agricultural extension, learning and change. Rural Industries Research Development Corporation, Publication No 03/032, RIRDC Project No RDP-1A, Canberra, Australia.
• Garforth C., 2004. Introduction. In: Rivera W., Gary A. (eds), Demand driven approaches to agricultural extension. Agricultural and Rural Development, Discussion Paper 10, Extension Reform for Rural Development. The World Bank.
• Garforth C., Angell B., Archer J., Green K., 2003. Improving farmers' access to advice on land management: Lessons from case studies in developed countries. Agricultural Research and Extension Network, Network Paper No. 125.
• Haug R., 1999. Some leading issues in international agricultural extension, a literature review. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 5(4): 263-274.
• Grande J., 2011. New venture creation in the farm sector - Critical resources and capabilities. Journal of Rural Studies 27: 220-233.
• Heanue K., Mackan-Walsh A., Maher P. (eds), 2012. Teagasc best practice in extension services. Conference Proceedings, Nov. 1st 2012, Teagasc.
• Hennessy T., Heanue K., 2012. Quantifying the effect of Discussion Group membership on technology adoption and farm profit on dairy farms. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 18(1): 41-54.
• Food harvest 2020, 2010. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Dublin.
• Jiggins J., Samanta R.K., Olawoye J.E., 1998. Improving women farmers' access to extension services. Improving agricultural extension: A reference manual. UN Food and Agricultural Organisation, Rome: 73-82.
• Jones G.E., Garforth C., 1997. The history, development, and future of agricultural extension. Improving agricultural extension: A reference manual (3rd ed.). UN Food and Agricultural Organisation, Rome.
• Lafferty S., Commins P., Walsh, J., 1999. Irish agriculture in transition: A census atlas of agriculture in the Republic of Ireland. Teagasc, Dublin.
• Leeuwis C., 1989. Marginalization misunderstood; different patterns of farm development in the west of Ireland. Wageningse Sociologische Studies 26, Wageningen Agricultural University.
• Leeuwis C., van den Ban A.W., 2004. Communication for rural innovation: Rethinking agricultural extension. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford (3rd ed.).
• Lenihan M., Ruane D.J., Phelan J.F., 2002. The role of off-farm business development in creating a sustainable rural environment. Tearmann (2): 85-95.
• Lopez-i-Gelats F., Milan M.J., Bartolome J., 2011. Is farming enough in mountain areas? Farm diversification in the Pyrenees. Land Use Policy 28: 783-791.
• Lucey C., 2004. Going forward with the CAP and WTO. Agriculture thriving in transition. The Farmers Journal 12/4/2004, Ireland.
• Marsden T., Sonnino R., 2008. Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies 24(4): 422-431.
• McDonagh J., 2013. Rural geography I: Changing expectations and contradictions in the rural. Progress in Human Geography. Online, 18 January, DOI: 10.1177/0309132512474404.
• Moreno-Pérez O.M., Arnalte-Alegre E., Ortiz-Miranda D., 2011. Breaking down the growth of family farms: A case study of an intensive Mediterranean agriculture. Agricultural Systems 104: 500-511.
• Morrison S., 2012. Supporting the development needs of farmers. In: Heanue K., Mackan-Walsh A., Maher P. (eds), Teagasc best practice in extension services. Conference Proceedings, Nov. 1st 2012, Teagasc: 12-13.
• Murray P., 2000. Evaluating participatory extension programs: Challenges and problems. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40(4): 519-526.
• O'Hara P., 1998. Partners in production? Women, farm and family in Ireland. Berghahn Books, New York.
• Pannell D., 2006. Adoption of conservation practices by rural landlords: Implications from research and extension. Pannell Discussions Paper No. 86, University of Western Australia.
• Phelan J., 1998. Trends in Irish agriculture: Implications for extension and rural development. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education 5(3): 55-59.
• Potter C., Burney J., 2002. Agricultural multifunctionality in the WTO: Legitimate non-trade concern or disguised protectionism? Journal of Rural Studies 18(1): 35-47.
• Pretty J.N., 1995. Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development 23(8): 1247-1263.
• Pretty J.N., Chambers R., 1994. Towards a learning paradigm: New professionalism and institutions for agriculture. In: Scoones I., Thompson J. (eds), Beyond farmer first: Rural people's knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice. Intermediate Technology Publications, London: 182-202.
• Pretty J.N., Chambers R., 2000. Toward a learning paradigm: New professionalism and institutions for agriculture. In: Harris J.H. (ed.), Rethinking sustainability. Michigan University Press: 173-189.
• Qamar M.K., 2001. Global trends in reforming extension services: Implications for rural development education and training. Paper presented at International Workshop on Technical Training for Rural Development: Looking to the 21st Century, Baoding, China.
• Rivera W., 1996. Agricultural extension in transition worldwide: Structural, financial and managerial strategies for improving agricultural extension. Public Administration and Development 16(2): 151-161.
• Rivera W.M., 2008. Pathways and tensions in the family of reform. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 14(2): 101-109.
• Rivera W.M., Qamar M.K., 2003. Agricultural extension, rural development and food security challenge. UN Food and Agricultural Organisation, Rome.
• Rivera W.M., Qamar M.K., Crowder L.V., 2001. Agricultural and rural extension worldwide: Options for institutional reform in developing countries. UN Food and Agricultural Organisation, Rome.
• Share P., Tovey H., Corcoran M., 2007. A sociology of Ireland. Gill and Macmillan, Dublin.
• Shortall S., 2004. Social or economic goals, civic inclusion or exclusion? An analysis of rural development theory and practice. Sociologia Ruralis 44(1): 109-123.
• Somers N., 1998. Learning about sustainable agriculture: The case of Dutch arable farmers. In: Roling N.J., Wagemakers M. (eds), Facilitating sustainable agriculture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 125-133.
• Swanson, B.E., 2008. Global review of good agricultural extension and advisory practices. UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
• Swanson B.E., Samy M., 2002. Developing an extension partnership among public private and nongovernmental organisations. Journal of International Agriculture and Extension Education 9(1): 5-10.
• Teagasc Agriculture and Food Development Authority, 1995. Research/Advisory/Training Services, 1995-1999. Teagasc, Dublin.
• Teagasc Agriculture and Food Development Authority, 1998. Teagasc 2000 - Statement of Strategy. Available at: http:// www.teagasc.ie/ aboutus/ strategy/ strategy_10.asp, Dublin.
• Teagasc Agriculture and Food Development Authority, 2004. Planning post Fischler programme - Guidelines. Teagasc Staff Information Document, Teagasc, Dublin.
• Teagasc Agriculture and Food Development Authority, 2005. Options for Farm Families Programme. Teagasc, Dublin.
• Thrup L.A., Altieri M., 1998. Knowledge generation and technical change. In: Wolf S., Zilberman E. (eds), Knowledge generation and technical change: Institutional innovation in agriculture. Kluwer, Boston: 267-290.
• van den Ban A.W., Hawkins H.S., 1996. Agricultural extension. Blackwell Science, Oxford (2nd ed.).
• van Oost I., 2012. The European Innovation Partnership (EIP) 'Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability' and the proposals for the Farm Advisory System (FAS). In: Heanue K., Mackan-Walsh A., Maher P. (eds), Teagasc best practice in extension service. Conference Proceedings, Nov. 1st 2012, Teagasc: 11-12.
• Watson C., 2012. The role of professional advisers. In: Heanue K., Mackan-Walsh A., Maher P. (eds), Teagasc best practice in extension services. Conference Proceedings, Nov. 1st 2012, Teagasc: 14-15.
• Wilson G.A., 2001. From productivism to post-productivism ... and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26(1): 77-102.
• Wilson G., Rigg J., 2003. 'Post-productivist' agricultural regimes and the South: Discordant concepts? Progress in Human Geography 27(6): 681-707.
• World Bank, 2002. Extension and rural development: A convergence of views on institutional approaches? International Workshop, Nov. 12-14. The World Bank, Washington, DC.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/quageo-2013-0033