Probiotyki w żywieniu zwierząt towarzyszących

• Autorzy: Wincewicz E.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Probiotics in pets

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Funkcjonowanie układu pokarmowego oraz jego stan są niezmiernie waż­ne dla ogólnej kondycji zwierząt domowych. Niezakłócony ekosystem jelitowy stymuluje układ odpornościowy zwierzęcia, chroni psy i koty przed patogenami i zapewnia odpowied­nie składniki odżywcze. Prawidłowe żywienie jest więc jednym z elementów warunkują­cych właściwą homeostazę organizmu. Zbyt powszechne stosowanie antybiotyków i ich działania niepożądane spowodowały duże zainteresowanie wykorzystaniem probiotyków w celach profilaktyczno-leczniczych. Uzupełnienie dawek pokarmowych w odpowiednie gatunki bakterii o potwierdzonych właściwościach probiotycznych, pozwala na utrzymanie homeostazy przewodu pokarmowego zwierzęcia, powiększając tolerancję na niekorzystne bodźce środowiskowe, ułatwia procesy trawienia i zwiększa przyswajalność składników karmy, a w przypadku stosowania antybiotyków w celach leczniczych przyspiesza okres rekonwalescencji.

EN

The functioning of the digestive system and its condition are extremely impor­tant for overall health of pets. Stimulates intestinal ecosystem undisturbed animal's immune system, protects dogs and cats against pathogens and provide adequate nutrients. Proper nutrition is therefore one of the prerequisites for proper homeostasis of the organism. Too broad use of antibiotics and their side effects resulted in large interest in using probiotics for prophylactic and therapeutic. Supplementing rations with appropriate species of bac­teria with probiotic properties certified, allows you to maintain homeostasis in the gastro­intestinal tract of the animal, increasing tolerance to adverse environmental stimuli, helps digestion and increases the digestibility of feed ingredients, and for the use of antibiotics for treatment accelerates the recovery period.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Medicina Veterinaria
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 10
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: s.13-24,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Wincewicz E.

• Katedra Biostruktury I Fizjologii Zwierząt, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu, ul.Kożuchowska 1/3, 51-613 Wrocław

Bibliografia

• Bengmark S., 1998. Ecological control of the gastrointestinal tract. The role of probiotic flora. Gut., 42, 2-7.
• Benno Y., Nakao H., Uchida K., Mitsuoka T., 1992. Impact of the advances in age on the gastrointestinal microflora of beagle dogs. J. Vet. Med. Sci., 54, 703-706.
• Benyacoub J., 2003. Supplementation of food with Enterococcus faecium (SF68) stimulates immune functions in young dogs. J. Nutr., 133, 1158-1162.
• Borchers A., Keen C., Gershwin M., 2004. Probiotics and prebiotics, [in:] M. Gershwin, P. Nestel and C. Keen, Editors, Handbook of Nutrition and Immunity, Humana Press, Totowa. NJ.
• Brandtzaeg P., Halstensen T.S., Kett K., 1989. Immunobiology and immunopathology of human gut mucosa: Humoral immunity and intraepithelial lymphocytes. Gastroenterol., 97, 1562-1584.
• Buddington R.K., 2003. Postnatal changes in bacterial populations in the gastrointestinal tract of dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res., 64, 646-651.
• Cebra J.J., 1999. Influence of microbiota on intestinal immune system development. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 69, 1046-1051.
• Depta A., 2001. Probiotyki - właściwości i ich rola, i znaczenie oraz możliwości stosowania w profilaktyce i leczeniu schorzeń przewodu pokarmowego u prosiąt. Trzoda chlewna, 39, 7, 98-100.
• Davis C.P., Cleven D., Balish E., Yale C.E., 1977. Bacterial association in the gastrointestinal tract of Beagle dogs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 34, 194-206.
• Elwell C.A., Dreyfus L.A., 2000. DNase I homologous residues in CdtB are critical for cytolethal distending toxin-mediated cell cycle arrest. Mol. Microbiol., 37, 952-963.
• Erasmus L.J., Robinson P.H., Ahmadi A., Hinders R., Grrett J.E., 2005. Influence of prepartum and postpartum supplementation of a yeast culture and monensin, or both, on ruminal fermentation and performance of multiparous dairy cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 122, 219-239.
• Fuller R., 1991. Probiotics in human medicine. Gut., 32, 439 - 442.
• Goldin B.R., Gorbach S.L., Saxelin M., Barakat S., Gualtieri L., Salminen, S., 1992. Survival of lactobacillus species (strain GG) in human gastrointestinal tract. Dig. Dis. Sci., 37(1), 121-128.
• Gotteland M., Brunser O., Cruchet S., 2006. Systematic review: are probiotics useful in controlling gastric colonization by Helicobacter pylori?. Aliment Pharmacol Ther., 23, 1077-1086.
• Hooper L.V., Wong M.H., Thelin A., 2001. Molecular analysis of commensal host-microbial relationship in the intestine. Science., 291, 881-884.
• Jalkanen S., 1990. Lymphocyte homing into the gut. Immunopath., 12, 153-164.
• Johnston K.L., 1999. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract. 29, 523-550.
• Johnston K.L., Lamport A., Batt R.M., 1993. An unexpected bacterial flora in the proximal small intestine of normal cats. Veterinary Record., 132, 362-363.
• Kanauchi O., Matsumoto Y., Matsumura M., Fukuoka M., Bamba T., 2005. The beneficial effects of microflora, especially obligate anaerobes, and their products on the colonic environment in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr. Pharm. Des., 11, 1047-1053.
• Kelley R.L., Minikhiem D., Kiely B., O'Mahony L., O'Sullivan D., Boileau T., Park J. S., 2009. Clinical benefits of probiotic canine-derived Bifidobacterium animalis strain AHC7 in dogs with acute idiopathic diarrhea. Vet. Therap., 10(3), 121-130.
• Kolanowski W., 1999. Nowoczesne produkty spożywcze o pożądanym działaniu zdrowotnym, żywność funkcjonalna. Żywn. Zdr., 9; 8(1), 101-109.
• Lappin M.R., Veir J.K., Satyaraj E., 2009. Pilot study to evaluate the effect of oral supplementation of Enterococcus faecium SF68 on cats with latent feline herpesvirus 1, J. Feline Med. Surg., 11, 650.
• Lara-Tejero M., Galán J.E., 2000. A bacterial toxin that controls cell cycle progression as a deoxy- ribonuclease I-like protein. Science, 290, 354-357.
• Lilly D.M., Stillwell R.H., 1965. Probiotics: growth promoting factors produced by microorgan­isms. Science, 47, 747-748.
• Limdi J., O'Neill C., McLaughlin J., 2006. Do probiotics have a therapeutic role in gastroenterol­ogy? World J. Gastroenterol., 12 (34), 5447-5457.
• Linge P., 2005. The use of probiotics and yeast derivatives in India. World Poult., 21, 10, 12-15.
• Madsen K.L., Cornish A., Soper P., 2001. Probiotic bacteria enhance murine and human intestinal epithelial barrier function. Gastroenterology, 121, 580-591.
• Marcina'kova' M., Simonova' M., Strompfova' V., Laukova', A. 2006. Oral application of Entero­coccus faecium strain EE3 in healthy dogs. Folia Microbiologica, 51(3), 239-242.
• McCracken V.J., Gaskins H.R., 1999. Intestinal microbes and the immune system, [in:] Probiotics: A Critical Review (G.W. Tannock, ed.). Horizon Scientific Press, Norfolk, UK, 85-111.
• McKay D.M., Perdue M.H., 1993. Intestinal epithelial function: The case for immunophysiological regulation. Dig. Dis. Sci., 38, 1377-1387.
• Mentula S., Harmoinen J., Heikkila M., Westermarck E., Rautio M., Huovinen P., Kononen E., 2005. Comparison between cultured small-intestinal and fecal microbiotas in Beagle dogs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71, 4169-4175.
• Miecznikow E., 1907. The prolongation of life. New York: G. P. Putnom & Sons.
• Myers D., 2007. Probiotics. J. Exotic Pet. Med., 16, 3, 195-197.
• O'Mahony D., Murphy K. B., MacSharry J., Boileau T., Sunvold G., Reinhart,G., Kiely B., Shanahan F., O'Mahony L., 2009. Portrait of a canine probiotic bifidobacterium-from gut to gut. Vet. Microbiol., 139(1-2), 106-112.
• Ostaszewski P., Jank A., 2004. Probiotyki w żywieniu psów i kotów. Weterynaria w Praktyce, 6, 64.
• Ouwehand A.C., Isolauri E., Kirjavainen P.V., Salminen S.J., 1999. Probiotics: mechanisms and established effects. Int. Dairy, 9, 43-52.
• Rinkinen M., Jalava K., Westermarck E., Salminen S., Ouwehand A.C., 2003. Interaction between probiotic lactic acid bacteria and canine enteric pathogens: a risk factor for intestinal Enterococcus faecium colonization? Vet. Microbiol., 92(1-2), 111-119.
• Ritchie L.E., Burke K.F., Garcia-Mazcorro J.F., Steiner J.M., Suchodolski J.S. 2010. Characterization of fecal microbiota in cats using universal 16S rRNA gene and groupspecific primers for Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium spp. Vet. Microbiol., 144, 140-146.
• Salminen S., Ouwehand A., Isolauri E., 1998. Clinical applications ofprobiotic bacteria. Int. Dairy J., 8, 563-572.
• Sauter S.N., Benyacoub J., Allenspach K., Gaschen F., Ontsouka E., Reuteler G., Cavadini C., Knorr R., Blum J. W., 2006. Effects of probiotic bacteria in dogs with food responsive diarrhoea treated with an elimination diet. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition., 90(7-8), 269-277.
• Socha J. 1995. Mikroflora jelitowa a antybiotykoterapia. Pediatr Pol., 70, 547-552.
• Socha J., Madaliński K., Stolarczyk A., 2000. Probiotyki w chorobach przewodu pokarmowego i ich działanie immunomodulujące. Pediatr Współcz., 2(3), 137-140.
• Strompfova' V., Marcina'kova' M., Simonova' M., Bogovic-Matijasic' B., Laukova' A., 2006. Application of potential probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum AD1 strain in healthy dogs. Anaerobe., 12(2), 75-79.
• Suchodolski J.S., 2010. Characterization of fecal microbiota in cats using universal 16S rRNA gene and groupspecific primers for Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium spp. Vet. Microbiol., 144, 140-146.
• Suchodolski J.S., Dowd S.E., Westermarck E., Steinem J.M., Wolcott R.D., Spillman T., Harmoinen J.A., 2009. The effect of the macrolide antibiotic tylosin on microbial diversity In the panine small intestine as demonstrated by Massie paralel 16s rRNA gene sequencing. BMC Microbiol., 9, 210.
• Suchodolski J.S., Ruaux C.G, Steiner J.M., Fetz K.,. Williams D.A., 2005. Assessment of the qualitative variation in bacterial microflora among compartments of the intestinal tract of dogs by use of a molecular fingerprinting technique. Am. J. Vet. Res., 66, 1556-1562.
• Suchodolski J.S., Ruaux C.G., Steiner J.M., Fetz K., Williams D.A., 2004. Application of molecular fingerprinting for qualitative assessment of small-intestinal bacterial diversity in dogs. J. Clin. Microbiol., 42, 4702-4708.
• Sultan A., Durrani F., Suhail S., 2006. Comparative effect of yogurt as a probiotic on the performance of broiler chicks. Pakistan J. Biol. Sci. 9, 88-92.
• Swanson K.S., Dowd S.E., Suchodolski J.S., Middelbos I.S., Vester B.M., Barry K.A., Nelson K.E., Cann I.K, White B.A., Fahey G.C., 2010. Phylogenetic and genecentric metagenomics of the canine intestinal microbiome reveals similarities with human and mice. ISME J. 10.1038/ ismej.162.
• Swanson K.S., Fahey G.C. Jr. The role of yeasts in companion animal nutrition http://en.engormix. com/MA-pets/articles/the-role-yeasts-companion_430.htm) 5/14/2007.
• Tagg J.R., Dajani A.S., Wannamaker L.W., 1976. Bacteriocins of gram-positive bacteria. Bacteriol. Rev., 40, 722-756.
• Thorbecke G.J., 1959. Some histological and functional aspects of lymphoid tissue in germ free animals. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 78, 237-246.
• Trafalska E., Grzybowska K., 2004. Probiotyki - alternatywa dla antybiotyków? Wiadomości lekarskie, LVII, 9-10,491-498.
• Vickers R.J., Sunvold G.D., Kelley R.L., Reinhart G.A., 2001. Comparison of fermentation of selected fructooligosaccharides and other fiber substrates by canine colonic microflora. Am. J. Vet. Res., 62, 09-615.
• Weese J.S., Anderson M.E., 2002. Preliminary evaluation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG, a potential probiotic in dogs. Can. Vet. J., 43(10), 771-774.
• Zduńczyk Z., 2002. Probiotyki i prebiotyki, oddziaływanie lokalne i systemowe. Przemysł Spożywczy, 4, 6-8.