The World Health Organisation's Rationale for Physical Activity: a Philosophical Critique

• Autorzy: Andrew Bloodworth , Mike McNamee
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The World Health Organisation's rationale for physical activity draws heavily on scientific evidence regarding disease and obesity. Greater philosophical reflection on such concepts, along with a recognition that supposed scientific facts are rarely value-free, allow for a more positive and considered argument for physical activity and its benefits. Olympism, Olympic culture, sports education, pedagogy of sport

Słowa kluczowe

EN

well-being; health; disease; obesity

• Czasopismo: Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: 46
• Numer: 1
• Strony: 58-69

Daty

wydano

2009-12-01

online

2009-12-24

Twórcy

autor

Andrew Bloodworth

autor

Mike McNamee

Bibliografia

• Biddle, S., Fox K., & Boutcher S. H. (Eds.) (2000). Physical Activity and Psychological Well-Being. London: Routledge.
• Bloodworth, A. and McNamee, M. J. (2007). Conceptions of well-being in the psychology and exercise psychology literature: A philosophical critique. Health Care Analysis, 15, (2):107-21.[Crossref]
• Diener, E. & Lucas R. E. (1999). Personality and Subjective Well-Being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, N. Schwarz (Eds.). Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (pp. 213-229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
• Evans, J. (2003). Physical education and health: a polemic or ‘let them eat cake! European Physical Education Review, 9(1): 87-101.[Crossref]
• Griffin, J. (1996). Value Judgement Improving Our Ethical Beliefs. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Griffin, J. (1986). Well-Being Its Meaning Measurement and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Loumidis, K & Wells, A (2001). Exercising for the Wrong Reasons: Relationships Among Eating Disorder Beliefs, Dysfunctional Exercise Beliefs and Coping. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 8: 416-23.
• Nordenfelt, L. (1995). On the nature of health: an action theoretic approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Puska, P. (2004). ‘Foreward’ in (Eds.) P. Oja & J. Borms, Perspectives: Health Enhancing Physical Activity (pp. 17-19). Oxford: Meyer & Meyer Sport (UK) Ltd.
• Putnam, H. (2002). The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essay. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
• Rescher, N. (1972). Welfare The Social Issues in Philosophical Perspective. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
• Richman, K. (2004). Ethics and the metaphysics of medicine. Boston: MIT Press.
• Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2001). On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52: 141-66.[PubMed]
• Schramme, T. (2002). ‘Is it bad to have a disease?’ In A. Gimmler, C. Lenk, G. Aumüller (Eds.). Health and Quality of Life (pp. 61-7). Hamburg, London: Lit Verlag Münster.
• Sedgwick, P. (1982). Psycho Politics. London: Pluto Press Limited.
• von Wright, G. H. (1996). The Varieties of Goodness. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
• Vuori, I. (2004). Inactivity as a Disease Risk and Health Benefits of increased Physical Activity. In P. Oja, J. Borms, (Eds.) Health Enhancing Physical Activity (pp 29-95). Oxford: Meyer & Meyer Sport (UK) Ltd.
• World Heath Organisation (1948). Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19-22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948.
• World Health Organisation (2002). Myths about physical activity. Online. Available HTTP:
• World Health Organisation (2003c). Health and Development Through Physical Activity and Sport, Online. Available HTTP:
• World Health Organisation (2005a). Benefits of Physical Activity. Online. Available HTTP:
• World Health Organisation (2005b). Women and Physical Activity, Online. Available HTTP:

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/v10141-009-0004-2