Cross-Education and contralateral irradiation

• Autorzy: Stefan Panzer , David Schinowski , Daniel Kohle
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Cross-Education is characterized as the improvement in strength of the contralateral homologous muscle after unilateral practice. One potential mechanism to explain this phenomenon is that a unilateral maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) induces an involuntary irradiation of the contralateral homologous muscles. The purpose of the present two studies was to determine if contralateral irradiation is a potential mechanism to explain effects of cross-education. Contralateral irradiation was measured as the EMG co-activation in the homologous unpracticed arm. In Study 1 a unilateral dynamic extension/flexion arm movement was used to activate the triceps. The results indicated that unilateral practice induced a contralateral co-activation on the unpracticed arm. The same result can be reported for an isometric contraction (Study 2). The two studies provided empirical evidence that unilateral MVC did induce an involuntary muscle co-activity on the contralateral homologous muscles with increasing practice time in one testing session.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

spill-over; strength; EMG; performance; involuntary irradiation

• Czasopismo: Journal of Human Kinetics
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 27
• Strony: 66-79

Daty

wydano

2011-03-01

online

2011-04-06

Twórcy

autor

Stefan Panzer

• Institute of Sportsciences, University of Muenster, Germany

autor

David Schinowski

• Institute of Sportsciences, University of Muenster, Germany

autor

Daniel Kohle

• Institute of Sportsciences, University of Muenster, Germany

Bibliografia

• Basmajian, JV, de Luca, CJ. Muscles alive, their functions revealed by electromyography. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1985
• Carroll, TJ, Herbert, RD, Munn, J, Lee, M, Gandevia, SC. Contralateral effects of unilateral strength training: evidence and possible mechanisms. J Appl Physiol, 2006; 101(5): 1514-22[PubMed][Crossref]
• Darcus, HD, Salter, N. The effect of repeated muscular exertion on muscle strength. J Appl Physio, l 1955; 129 (2): 325-36
• Davies, RC. The pattern of muscular action in simple voluntary movement. J Exp Psych, 1942; 31(5): 347-366[Crossref]
• Dimitrijevic, MR, McKay, WB, Sarjanovic, I, Sherwood, AM, Svirtlih, L, Vrbovà, G. Co-activation of ipsi- and contrallateral muscle groups during contraction of ankle dorsiflexors. J. Neurol. Sci., 1992; 109:49-55
• Farthing, JP. Cross-education of strength depends on limb dominance: implications for theory and application. Exerc Sport Sci Rev, 2009; 37(4), 179-187[PubMed]
• Farthing, JP, Borowsky, R, Chilibeck, PD, Binsted, G, Sarty, GE. Neuro-physiological adaptations associated with cross-education of strength. Brain Topogr, 2007; 20(2): 77-88[Crossref][PubMed][WoS]
• Hellebrandt, FA. Cross-education; ipsilateral and contralateral effects of unimanual training. J Appl Physio, 1951; 4 (2): 136-44.
• Hellebrandt, FA. Ipsilateral and Contralateral Effects of Unimanual Training. J Appl Physiol, 1955; 325 (129)
• Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Merletti R, Stegeman DF, Blok J, Rau G et al. European recommendations for surface ElectroMyoGraphy, results of the SENIAM project. Roessingh Research and Development b.v, Roessingh, 1999
• Hortobágyi T, Taylor JL, Petersen N, Russell G, Gandevia SC. Changes in segmental and motor cortical output produced by contralateral muscle contractions and altered sensory inputs in humans. Journal of Neurophysio, 2003; 90: 2451-2459
• Lee, M and Carroll, TJ. Cross-education: possible mechanisms for the contralateral effects of unilateral resistance training. Sports Med, 2007; 37 (1): 1-14[WoS][Crossref][PubMed]
• Mayston, M, Certer, K, Whybrow, T, Lockley, M, Kelly, A, Harrison, LM, and Stephens, JA. Bilateral EMG accompanies unilateral tasks in man. J Physio, l 1994; 480-484.
• Mühlbauer, T, Panzer, S, Shea, CH. Transfer of movement sequences: Effects of decreased and increased loads. Q J Exp Psycho, l 2007; 60(6): 770-778[Crossref]
• Munn, J, Herbert, R D, Gandevia, SC. Contralateral effects of unilateral resistance training: a meta-analysis. J Appl Physiol, 2004; 96(5): 1861-1866[Crossref][PubMed]
• Ng JK, Kippers V, Richardson CA. Muscle Wbre orientation of abdominal muscles and suggested surface EMG electrode positions. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1998; 38:51-58
• Oldfield, RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologica, 1971; 9(1): 97-113[Crossref]
• Panzer, S., Krüger, M., Mühlbauer, T. Shea, C. H. Asymmetric effector transfer of complex movement sequences: Effects of increased and decreased loads. Human Movement Science, 2010; 29(1): 62-72[Crossref][WoS]
• Rube N, Secher, NH. Effect of training on central factors in fatigue following two- and one-leg static exercise in man. Acta Physiologica Scandinavia, 1991; 141: 87-95
• Schabowsky, Ch, Hidler, JM, Lum, P. Greater reliance on impedance control in the nondominant arm compared with the dominant arm when adapting to a novel dynamic environment. Exp Brain Res, 2007; 182: 567-577[WoS]
• Scripture, EW, Smith, TL, Brown, EM. On the education of muscular control and power. Student Yale Psychology Lab, 1894; 2: 114-119
• Sherrington, CS. Integrative action of the nervous system. New York: Scribner, 1906.
• Wissler, C and Richardson, WW. Diffusion of the Motor Impulse. Psycho Rev, 1900: 7(1): 29-38.[Crossref]
• Zhou, S. Cross-education and neuromuscular adaptations during early stage of strength training. J Exerc. Sci. Fit., 2003; 1: 54-60
• Zijdewind, I, Kernell, D. Bilateral Interactions during contractions of intrinsic hand muscles. Journal of Neurophysio, 2001;85: 1907-1913

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/v10078-011-0006-0