Predictive model of repeat induced abortion in Hungary

• Autorzy: Zoltan Kozinszky , Iván Devosa , János Sikovanyecz , Dávid Szabó , Zoltán Pál , Katalin Barabás , Attila Pál
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Repeat abortion; Contraception; Logistic regression model; Questionnaire survey

• Czasopismo: Open Medicine
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 6
• Numer: 6
• Strony: 701-709

Daty

wydano

2011-12-01

online

2011-10-08

Twórcy

autor

Zoltan Kozinszky,

autor

Iván Devosa

autor

János Sikovanyecz

• Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 1., H-6726, Szeged, Hungary

autor

Dávid Szabó

• Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 1., H-6726, Szeged, Hungary

autor

Zoltán Pál

• Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 1., H-6726, Szeged, Hungary

autor

Katalin Barabás

• Institute of Behaviour Science, Section of Behaviour Science, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, Szentháromság u. 5., H-6720, Szeged, Hungary

autor

Attila Pál

• Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 1., H-6726, Szeged, Hungary

Bibliografia

• [1] Hungarian Central Statistical Office (2006) Hungarian Demographic Year Book. Hungarian Central Statistical Office, Budapest
• [2] Kozinszky Z, Boda K, Bartfai Gy (2001) Determinants of abortion among women undergoing artificial abortion using logistic regression model. Eur J Contr Reprod Health Care 6:145–152
• [3] Kamarás F (1999) Fertility and family surveys in countries of the ECE region (Standard country report). United Nations, New York and Geneva
• [4] United Nations (2006) Demographic Year Book. United Nations, New York
• [5] Millar WJ, Wadhera S, Henshaw SK (1997) Repeat abortions in Canada, 1975-1993. Fam Plann Perspect 29:20–24 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2953349[Crossref]
• [6] Institute AG. Facts in brief: induced abortion in the United States. Available at: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.html
• [7] Steinhoff PG, Smith RG, Palmore JA, Diamond M, Chung CS (1979) Women who obtain repeat abortions: a study based on record linkage. Fam Plann Perspect 11:30–38 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2134479[Crossref]
• [8] Berger C, Gold D, Andres D, Gillett P, Kinch R (1984) Repeat abortion: Is it a problem? Fam Plann Perspect 16:70–77 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2134932[Crossref]
• [9] Westfall JM, Kallail KJ (1995). Repeat abortion and use of primary care health services. Fam Plann Perspect 27:162–165 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2136261[Crossref]
• [10] Freeman EW, Rickels K, Huggins GR, Garcia CR, Polin J (1980) Emotional distress patterns among women having first or repeat abortions. Obstet Gynecol 55:630–636 [PubMed]
• [11] Bajos N, Leridon H, Goulard H, Oustry P, Job-Spira N (2003) Contraception from accessibility to efficiency. Hum Reprod 18:994–999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg215[Crossref]
• [12] Glasier A (1998) Safety of emergency contraception. J Am Med Women Assoc 53:219–221
• [13] Goulard H, Moreau C, Gilbert F, Job-Spira N, Bajos N (2006) Contraceptive failures and determinants of emergency contraceptive use. Contraception 74:208–213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.007[Crossref]
• [14] Grossmann R (2001) Emergency contraception pill can prevent abortion. Am J Public Health 97:1137–1138 http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.91.7.1137[Crossref]
• [15] Moreau C, Bouyer J, Goulard H, Bajos N (2005) The remaining barriers to the use of emergency contraception: perception of pregnancy risk by women undergoing induced abortions Contraception 71:202–207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2004.09.004[Crossref]
• [16] Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD (1995) Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med 333:1517–1521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199512073332301[Crossref]
• [17] Oddens B (1996) The determinants of contraceptive use. Eburon, The Netherlands
• [18] Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. John Wiley and Sons, New York
• [19] Holmgren K (1994) Repeat abortion and contraceptive use. Report from an interview study in Stockholm. Gynecol Obstet Invest 37:254–259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000292572[Crossref]
• [20] Moreau C, Trussell J, G. Rodriguez, Bajos N, Bouyer J (2007) Contraceptive failure rates in France: results from a population-based survey. Hum Reprod 22:2422–2427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem184[Crossref][WoS]
• [21] Skjeldestad FE (1994). The incidence of repeat induced abortion -a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 73:706–710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016349409029408[Crossref]
• [22] Garg M, Singh M, Mansour D (2001) Peri-abortion contraceptive care: Can we reduce the incidence of repeat abortions? J Fam Plann Repr H Care 27:77–80 http://dx.doi.org/10.1783/147118901101195290[Crossref]

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/s11536-011-0080-7