Discursive Approaches to the Reception of Non-EU Migrants in Polish Official Political Discourse

• Authors: Claire Laurent , Elodie Thevenin

Abstracts

EN

Poland has faced several crisis situations related to migration in the past decade. With differences in the scale and origins of incoming people, these crises have triggered various reactions from Polish policy-makers, from the welcoming of non-EU migrants to the implementation of restrictive measures at the Polish border. The present research uses a discursive approach to study the ways in which non-EU migrants are presented and discussed in Poland. By comparing official discourses from Polish authorities during the 2015–2016 migration crisis, the 2021 border crisis with Belarus and following the Russian war on Ukraine in 2022, we analyse how different groups of non-EU migrants are discursively described and considered by political figures. Furthermore, as these crises have important links with the European Union (EU), we also investigate how Poland’s relationship with the EU is envisioned by Polish authorities. Through the discourse analysis carried out, we argue that ‘migrants’ and ‘refugees’ are discursively constructed as opposing groups in a manner that is highly visible. This discursive strategy is instrumentally used to reflect on the perceived deservingness, alterity or proximity of incoming people. We identify one unifying perspective of Poland’s relationship with the EU throughout these crises: Polish authorities are keen to stress the importance of its membership of the EU when benefiting from the latter’s restriction of migration to Europe.

Keywords

EN

discourse analysis; Poland; refugee; migrant; semantics; European Union

• Publisher: Ośrodek Badań nad Migracjami Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego oraz Polska Akademia Nauk
• Journal: Central and Eastern European Migration Review
• Year: 2024
• Volume: 13
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 69-88

Dates

published

2024

Contributors

author

Claire Laurent

• University of Strasbourg, France

author

Elodie Thevenin

• Jagiellonian University, Poland

References

• Abdelaaty L. (2021). Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Abdelaaty L. (2022). European Countries Are Welcoming Ukrainian Refugees. It Was a Different Story in 2015. The Washington Post, 23 March. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/23/ukraine-refugees-welcome-europe/ (accessed 23 January 2024).
• Abdelaaty L., Hamlin R. (2022). Introduction: The Politics of the Migrant/Refugee Binary. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 20(2): 233–239.
• Amossy R. (2016). L’Argumentation dans le Discours. Paris: Armand Colin.
• Amossy R. (2000). L’Argumentation dans le Discours. Discours Politique, Littérature d’Idées, Fiction. Paris: Nathan.
• Apostolova R. (2015). Of Refugees and Migrants: Stigma, Politics, and Boundary Work at the Borders of Europe. American Sociological Association Newsletter, 14 September. https://asaculturesection.org/2015/09/14/of-refugees-and-migrants-stigma-politics-and-boundary-work-at-the-borders-of-europe/ (accessed 10 February 2024).
• Baker P., Gabrielatos C., KhosraviNik M., Krzyżanowski M., McEnery T., Wodak R. (2008). A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press. Discourse & Society 19(3): 273–306.
• Balicki J. (2022). Migration Crisis on the Polish–Belarusian Border (2021–2022) from a Humanitarian and Human Rights Perspective. Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs 26(2): 75–87.
• Bates D. (2023). ‘The Jobs All Go to Foreigners’: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Labour Party’s ‘Left-Wing’ Case for Immigration Controls. Critical Discourse Studies 20(2): 183–199.
• Bennett S. (2018). New ‘Crises’, Old Habits: Online Interdiscursivity and Intertextuality in UK Migration Policy Discourses. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16(1–2): 140–160.
• Bigo D. (2002). Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease. Alternatives 27(1, Special Issue): 63–92.
• Bodnar A., Grzelak A. (2023). The Polish–Belarusian Border Crisis and the (Lack of) European Union Response. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze 28(1): 57–86.
• Boomgaarden H.G., Vliegenthart R. (2009). How News Content Influences Anti-Immigration Attitudes: Germany, 1993–2005. European Journal of Political Research 48(4): 516–542.
• Calabrese L. (2018). Faut-il Dire Migrant ou Réfugié? Débat Lexico-Sémantique autour d’un Problème Public. Languages 210(2): 105–124.
• Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales (2012a). Définition de ‘Migrant’. https://www.cnrtl.fr/definition/MIGRANT (accessed 10 April 2023).
• Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales (2012b). Définition de ‘Réfugié’. https://www.cnrtl.fr/definition/r%C3%A9fugi%C3%A9 (accessed 10 February 2024).
• Charaudeau P. (2005). Le Discours Politique: Les Masques du Pouvoir. Paris: Vuibert.
• Charteris-Black J. (2006). Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005 Election Campaign. Discourse & Society 17(5): 563–581.
• Collyer M., de Haas H. (2012). Developing Dynamic Categorisations of Transit Migration. Population, Space and Place 18(4): 468–481.
• Consilium (2023). EU Restrictive Measures against Belarus, 27 February (last reviewed). https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions/restrictive-measures-against-belarus/ (accessed 10 February 2024).
• Crawley H. (2016). Managing the Unmanageable? Understanding Europe’s Response to the Migration ‘Crisis’. Human Geography 9(2): 13–23.
• Crawley H., Skleparis D. (2018). Refugees, Migrants, Neither, Both: Categorical Fetishism and the Politics of Bounding in Europe’s ‘Migration Crisis’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44(1): 48–64.
• Csehi R., Zgut E. (2021). ‘We Won’t Let Brussels Dictate Us’: Eurosceptic Populism in Hungary and Poland. European Politics and Society 22(1): 53–68.
• d’Haenens L., de Lange M. (2001). Framing of Asylum Seekers in Dutch Regional Newspapers. Media, Culture & Society 23(6): 847–860.
• De Coninck D. (2022). The Refugee Paradox During Wartime in Europe: How Ukrainian and Afghan Refugees are (not) Alike. International Migration Review 57(2): 578–586.
• Dobry M. (2009). Sociologie des Crises Politiques: La Dynamique des Mobilisations Multisectorielles. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
• Eberl J.-M., Meltzer C.E., Heidenreich T., Herrero B., Theorin N., Lind F., Berganza R., Boomgaarden H.G., Schemer C., Strömbäck J. (2018). The European Media Discourse on Immigration and its Effects: A Literature Review. Annals of the International Communication Association 42(3): 207–223.
• Ekström M. (2007). Occupying the Floor in Political Press Conferences: A Study on Interaction and Territorial Power, paper delivered at the ICA’s annual conference, San Francisco, 24–28 May.
• El Refaie E. (2001). Metaphors We Discriminate by: Naturalized Themes in Austrian Newspaper Articles about Asylum Seekers. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(3): 352–371.
• Filipec O. (2022). Multilevel Analysis of the 2021 Poland–Belarus Border Crisis in the Context of Hybrid Threats. Central European Journal of Politics 8(1): 1–18.
• Frelak J.S. (2017). Solidarity in European Migration Policy: The Perspective of the Visegrád States, in: A. Grimmel, S. My Giang (eds), Solidarity in the European Union: A Fundamental Value in Crisis, pp. 81–95. Cham: Springer.
• Góra M., Mach Z., Styczyńska N. (2022). Poland and Russia: Turbulent Relations and No Rapprochement in Sight, in: M. Kaeding, J. Pollak, P. Schmidt (eds), Russia and the Future of Europe: Views from the Capitals, pp. 79–83. New York: Springer.
• Greussing E., Boomgaarden H.G. (2017). Shifting the Refugee Narrative? An Automated Frame Analysis of Europe’s 2015 Refugee Crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43(11): 1749–1774.
• Grześkowiak M. (2023). The ‘Guardian of the Treaties’ Is No More? The European Commission and the 2021 Humanitarian Crisis on Poland–Belarus Border. Refugee Survey Quarterly 42(1): 81–102.
• Guild E., Costello C., Moreno-Lax V. (2017). Implementation of the 2015 Council Decisions Establishing Provisional Measures in the Area of International Protection for the Benefit of Italy and of Greece. Center for European Policy Studies. https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/implementation-2015-council-decisions-establishing-provisional-measures-area/ (accessed 10 February 2024).
• Halemba A. (2022). Ethnographic Snapshot. Europe in the Woods: Reflections on the Situation at the Polish–Belarusian Border. Ethnologia Europaea 52(1): 1–13.
• Hamlin R. (2021). Crossing: How We Label and React to People on the Move. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Hébert L. (2001). Introduction à la Sémantique des Textes. Paris: Champion.
• Holmes S.M., Castañeda H. (2016). Representing the ‘European Refugee Crisis’ in Germany and Beyond: Deservingness and Difference, Life and Death. American Ethnologist 43(1): 12–24.
• Horsti K. (2008). Hope and Despair: Representation of Europe and Africa in News Coverage of ‘Migration Crisis’. Communication Studies 3: 125–156.
• Hutter S., Kriesi H. (2022). Politicising Immigration in Times of Crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48(2): 341–365.
• Huysmans J. (2006). The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. London: Routledge.
• Kancelaria Premiera (2016). Konferencja Prasowa Premier Beaty Szydło po Szczyczie Rady Europejskiej, 18 March. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7j2xet8hdk (accessed 10 February 2024).
• Karakiewicz-Krawczyk K., Zdziarski K., Landowski M., Nieradko-Heluszko A., Kotwas A., Szumilas P., Knyszyńska A., Karakiewicz B. (2022). The Opinions of Poles about the Need to Provide Humanitarian Aid to Refugees from the Area Covered by the Russian–Ukrainian War. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(20): Article 20.
• Kerbrat-Orecchioni C. (2017). Les Débats de l’Entre-Deux-Tours des Elections Présidentielles Françaises. Paris: L’Harmattan.
• Kirtsoglou E., Tsimouris G. (2018). Migration, Crisis, Liberalism: The Cultural and Racial Politics of Islamophobia and ‘Radical Alterity’ in Modern Greece. Ethnic and Racial Studies 41(10): 1874–1892.
• Krieg-Planque A. (2017). Analyser les Discours Institutionnels. Malakoff: Armand Colin.
• Krotofil J., Motak D. (2018). A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Media Coverage of the Migration Crisis in Poland. Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis 28: 92–115.
• Krzyżanowska N., Krzyżanowski M. (2018). ‘Crisis’ and Migration in Poland: Discursive Shifts, Anti-Pluralism and the Politicisation of Exclusion. Sociology 52(3): 612–618.
• Krzyżanowski M. (2018). Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics: On Politicization and Mediatization of the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Poland. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies 16(1–2): 76–96.
• Krzyżanowski M. (2020). Discursive Shifts and the Normalisation of Racism: Imaginaries of Immigration, Moral Panics and the Discourse of Contemporary Right-Wing Populism. Social Semiotics 30(4): 503–527.
• Krzyżanowski M., Triandafyllidou A., Wodak R. (2018). The Mediatization and the Politicization of the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Europe. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16(1–2): 1–14.
• Léonard S., Kaunert C. (2022). The Securitisation of Migration in the European Union: Frontex and Its Evolving Security Practices. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48(6): 1417–1429.
• Mach Z., Styczyńska N. (2021). Poland: Economic Enthusiasts, Value Adversaries, in: M. Kaeding, J. Pollak, P. Schmidt (eds), Euroscepticism and the Future of Europe, pp. 115–118. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Milioni D.L., Doudaki V., Tsiligiannis P.G., Papa V., Vadratsikas K. (2015). Conflict as News and News as Conflict: A Multidimensional Content Analysis of TV News in Cyprus. International Journal of Communication 9(1): 752–772.
• Ministerstwo Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji (2021). Konferencja Prasowa S. Żaryn, M. Kamiński, 27 September. https://www.gov.pl/web/mswia/sluzby-ustalily-ze-wsrod-zatrzymanych-migrantow-sa-osoby-niebezpieczne (accessed 10 February 2024).
• Moberg A. (2020). When the Return of the Nation-State Undermines the Rule of Law: Poland, the EU, and Article 7 TEU, in: A. Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, K. Leijon, A. Michalski, L. Oxelheim (eds), The European Union and the Return of the Nation State: Interdisciplinary European Studies, pp. 59–82. Cham: Springer.
• Paynter E. (2022). Border Crises and Migrant Deservingness: How the Refugee/Economic Migrant Binary Racializes Asylum and Affects Migrants’ Navigation of Reception. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 20(2): 293–306.
• Pech L., Scheppele K.L. (2017). Illiberalism Within: Rule of Law Backsliding in the EU. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 19: 3–47.
• Perelman C., Olbrechts-Tyteca L. (2008). Traité de l’Argumentation. Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
• Permoser J.M. (2017). Redefining Membership: Restrictive Rights and Categorisation in European Union Migration Policy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43(15): 2536–2555.
• Pędziwiatr K. (2019). The New Polish Migration Policy – False Start. OpenDemocracy, 19 August. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/the-new-polish-migration-policy-false-start/?fbclid=IwAR2UWXbbRChGMyA43nYb5n2GzrE6TEPGS69fGyxxcv2vHU2mHo2_45QWRoQ (accessed 10 February 2024).
• Pietrusińska M. (2022). ‘People From the Forest’: Discourse About Migrants in the Narratives of NGO Workers and Activists Involved in the Humanitarian Crisis at the Polish-Belarusian Border. Sprawy Narodowościowe 54: Article 2803.
• Prezydent RP Andrzej Duda (2022). Wypowiedź Prezydenta po Audiencji u Papieża Franciszka, 1 April. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6nnfIyySLY (accessed 10 February 2024).
• Rastier F. (2011). La Mesure et le Grain : Sémantique de Corpus. Paris: Champion.
• Reisigl M., Wodak R. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
• Rheindorf M., Wodak R. (2020). Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Migration Control: Language Policy, Identity and Belonging. Language, Mobility and Institutions. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Rzepnikowska A. (2023). Racialisation of Polish Migrants in the UK and in Spain (Catalonia). Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 49(6): 1517–1533.
• Sacks H. (1972). On the Analyzability of Stories by Children, in: J.J. Gumperz, D. Hymes (eds), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, pp. 325–345. New York: Rinehart & Winston.
• Sacks H. (1995). Lectures on Conversation. Volumes I and II, G. Jefferson (ed.), with introduction by E.A. Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Soyaltin-Colella D. (2022). The EU’s ‘Actions-Without-Sanctions’? The Politics of the Rule of Law Crisis in Many Europes. European Politics and Society 23(1): 25–41.
• Stachowitsch S., Sachseder J. (2019). The Gendered and Racialized Politics of Risk Analysis. The Case of Frontex. Critical Studies on Security 7(2): 107–123.
• Takle M. (2017). Is the Migration Crisis a Solidarity Crisis? In: A. Grimmel (ed.), The Crisis of the European Union, pp. 116–129. London: Routledge.
• Tazzioli M., Walters W. (2016). The Sight of Migration: Governmentality, Visibility and Europe’s Contested Borders. Global Society 30(3): 445–464.
• Thevenin E. (2021). Between Human Rights and Security Concerns: Politicisation of EU–Turkey and EU–Libya Agreements on Migration in National Parliaments. European Security 30(3): 464–484.
• Thevenin E. (2022). Protecting Europe Against Migration: Law and Justice’s Populist Discourse in the Polish Parliament, in: H. Dajč, I. Jarić, L. Dobrovšak (eds), Contemporary Populism and Its Political Consequences: Discourses and Practices in Central and South-Eastern Europe, pp. 289–306. Zagreb: Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar.
• Triandafyllidou A. (2006). Nations, Migrants, and Transnational Identifications: An Interactive Approach to Nationalism, in: G. Delanty, K. Kumar (eds), The Sage Handbook of Nations and Nationalism, pp. 285–294. London: Sage.
• Triandafyllidou A., Kouki H. (2013). Muslim Immigrants and the Greek Nation: The Emergence of Nationalist Intolerance. Ethnicities 13(6): 709–728.
• UNHCR (2015). Refugee vs Migrant: Which Is Right and Why It Matters. https://www.unrefugees.org/news/refugee-or-migrant-which-is-right/ (accessed 10 February 2024).
• UNHCR (2023). Ukraine Emergency. https://www.unhcr.org/ukraine-emergency.html (accessed 10 February 2024).
• van Dijk T.A. (2018). Discourse and Migration, in: R. Zapata-Barrero, E. Yalaz (eds), Qualitative Research in European Migration Studies, pp. 227–245. Cham: Springer.
• van Leeuwen T., Wodak R. (1999). Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis. Discourse Studies 1(1): 83–118.
• Wodak R. (2011). ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Inclusion and Exclusion – Discrimination via Discourse, in: G. Delanty, R. Wodak, P. Jones (eds), Identity, Belonging and Migration, pp. 54–77. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
• Wodak R. (2015). The Discursive Construction of Strangers: Analyzing Discourses about Migrants and Migration from a Discourse-Historical Perspective, in: Migration and Citizenship. Newsletter of the American Political Science Association, Organized Section on Migration and Citizenship: 6–10.
• Wodak R. (2017). ‘Strangers in Europe’: A Discourse-Historical Approach to the Legitimation of Immigration Control 2015/16, in: S. Zhao, E. Djonov, A. Björkvall, M. Boeriis (eds), Advancing Multimodal and Critical Discourse Studies: Interdisciplinary Research Inspired by Theo Van Leeuwen’s Social Semiotics, pp. 31–49. New York: Routledge.
• Wodak R. (2020). The Language of Walls: Inclusion, Exclusion, and the Racialization of Space, in: J. Solomos (ed.), Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Racisms, pp. 160–177. London: Routledge.
• Wodak R., Boukala S. (2015a). European Identities and the Revival of Nationalism in the European Union: A Discourse Historical Approach. Journal of Language and Politics 14(1): 87–109.
• Wodak R., Boukala S. (2015b). (Supra)National Identity and Language: Rethinking National and European Migration Policies and the Linguistic Integration of Migrants. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 35: 253–273.
• Zawadzka-Paluektau N. (2022). Ukrainian Refugees in Polish Press. Discourse & Communication 17(1): 96–111.

Identifiers

DOI

10.54667/ceemr.2024.03

Biblioteka Nauki

48844802