Lokalna Europejska Stolica Kultury Wrocław 2016 – społeczne oddziaływanie ESK w regionie Dolnego Śląska

• Authors: Katarzyna Kajdanek

Title variants

EN

Local European Capital of Culture Wrocław 2016 – Social Impact of the ECC in the Lower Silesia Region

Abstracts

EN

The European Capital of Culture Wrocław 2016 was the second location, of this series of events in Poland after Krakow. The number of events, estimated at over 2,000, meant that the city and the region were (to an uneven degree) subject to the impact of cultural impulses of an unprecedented scale. From a social point of view, it is important to look at the social effect of the ECOC, i.e., the response to these cultural events, placed in the context of lifestyles and biographical circumstances, and the consequences it may have had for the functioning of the region’s inhabitants (as compared to the inhabitants of the central city) in terms of cultural practices. The text presents selected aspects of the ECC social effect observed on the periphery of the Lower Silesian region. The ECC effect is defined as the social response to this complex cultural intervention and its possible consequences for the functioning of local communities. The empirical basis for the analysis are the results of quantitative research carried out as part of the ECC evaluation project. These revealed the limitations on access to participation in the ECOC by different social categories (including women, people with children and the poor), the extent of participation and the type of events chosen by peripheral residents (limited participation mainly in mass, open, free, family festive events) and the dominant nature of the experience shaping the social impact of the ECOC (focus on having fun, recreational leisure activities, linking participation to meeting family and friends).

PL

Europejska Stolica Kultury Wrocław 2016 była drugim, po Krakowie, przykładem organizacji tego cyklu imprez w Polsce. Liczba wydarzeń, szacowana na ponad 2000, spowodowała, że miasto i region (w nierównomiernym stopniu) podlegały oddziaływaniu impulsów kulturalnych o niespotykanej dotąd skali. Ze społecznego punktu widzenia istotne jest przyglądanie się społecznemu efektowi ESK, czyli umieszczonej w kontekście stylów życia i uwarunkowań biograficznych reakcji na te wydarzenia kulturalne oraz temu, jakie może ona mieć konsekwencje dla funkcjonowania mieszkańców regionu (w porównaniu z mieszkańcami miasta centralnego) w obszarze praktyk kulturalnych. Tekst prezentuje wybrane aspekty społecznego efektu ESK obserwowanego na peryferiach regionu Dolnego Śląska. Efekt ESK zdefiniowano jako społeczną reakcję na tę złożoną interwencję kulturalną oraz jej możliwe konsekwencje dla funkcjonowania lokalnych zbiorowości. Podstawą empiryczną analizy są wyniki badań ilościowych wykonanych w ramach projektu ewaluacji ESK. Ujawniły one ograniczenia dostępu do udziału w ESK różnych kategorii społecznych (m.in. kobiet, osób mających dzieci, osób ubogich), zakres uczestnictwa i typ imprez wybranych przez mieszkańców peryferii (ograniczony udział głównie w masowych, otwartych, darmowych, festynowych wydarzeniach rodzinnych) oraz dominujący charakter wyniesionych doświadczeń kształtujących społeczny efekt ESK (skupienie na dobrej zabawie, rekreacyjnym spędzeniu czasu wolnego, powiązaniu uczestnictwa ze spotkaniem z rodziną, znajomymi).

Keywords

PL

ESK Wrocław 2016; uczestnictwo w kulturze; relacje centrum-peryferie

EN

ECOC Wrocław 2016; cultural participation; relations between centre and periphery

• Publisher: Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
• Journal: Perspektywy Kultury
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 40
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 227-240

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Katarzyna Kajdanek

• Uniwersytet Wrocławski

• https://orcid.org/0000000342640842

References

• Andres, L., & Chapain, C. (2013). The integration of cultural and creative industries into local and regional development strategies in Birmingham and Marseille: Towards an inclusive and collaborative governance? Regional Studies, 47(2), 161–182.
• Andres, L., & Grésillon, B. (2014). ‘European Capital of Culture’: A Leverage for Regional Development and Governance? The Case of Marseille Provence 2013. Regions Magazine, 295(1), 8–10.
• Appelblad, H. (2019). Cultural promotion of place as ‘Northern’ space: The case of the umeå 2014–european capital of culture event. In Urban Events, Place Branding and Promotion: Place Event Marketing (pp. 25–46). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429424847-2
• Bakucz, M. (2002). European Capital of Culture on the periphery. Regional Studies Association International Conference, Regions in Focus, 2–5.
• Balsas, C. J. L. (2004). City centre regeneration in the context of the 2001 European Capital of Culture in Porto, Portugal. In Local Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269094042000286873
• Bell, D., & Orozco, L. (2020). Neighbourhood arts spaces in place: cultural infrastructure and participation on the outskirts of the creative city. International Journal of Cultural Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2019.1709059
• Bıçakçı, A. B. (2012). Branding the city through culture: Istanbul, European Capital of Culture 2010. International Journal of Human Sciences, 9(1), 13–17.
• Błaszczyk, M., & Banaszak, E. (2020). Społeczne rozumienia kultury. Studia Socjologiczne, 2.
• Boland, P., Murtagh, B., & Shirlow, P. (2019). Fashioning a City of Culture: ‘life and place changing’ or ‘12 month party’? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 25(2), 246–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2016.1231181
• Chmielewski, A. (2017). Rethinking a Central European City. The Polish Review. https://doi.org/10.5406/polishreview.62.2.0003
• Clopot, C., & Strani, K. (2019). European Capitals of Culture: Discourses of European ness in Valletta, Plovdiv and Galway. In Heritage and Festivals in Europe. Taylor & Francis.
• Farmaki, A., Christou, P., Saveriades, A., & Spanou-Tripinioti, E. (2019). Perceptions of Pafos as European Capital of Culture: Tourism stakeholder and resident perspectives. International Journal of Tourism Research, 21(2), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2257
• Herrero, L. C., Sanz, J. Á., Devesa, M., Bedate, A., & del Barrio, M. J. (2006). The economic impact of cultural events: A case-study of Salamanca 2002, European Capital of Culture. European Urban and Regional Studies, 13(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776406058946
• Hudec, O., & Dzupka, P. (2016). Culture-led regeneration through the young generation: Kosice as the European Capital of Culture. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(3), 531–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776414528724
• Immler, N. L., & Sakkers, H. (2014). (Re)Programming Europe: European Capitals of Culture: Rethinking the role of culture. Journal of European Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047244113515567
• Kajdanek, K. (2018a). Centrum i peryferie Europejskiej Stolicy Kultury. Społeczny efekt ESK w odbiorze mieszkańców Dolnego Śląska. In Kultura na peryferiach (pp. 109–132).
• Kajdanek, K. (2018b). Deindywiduacja jako pragnienie miejskiej tożsamości. O znaczeniu uczestnictwa w wielkich miejskich wydarzeniach kulturalnych na przykładzie ceremonii otwarcia Europejskiej Stolicy Kultury (ESK Wrocław 2016). Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica. https://doi.org/10.26881/MAES.2018.1.11
• Kajdanek, K. (2021). Enjoyable events, excited audiences? Event experience during the Special Weekends of the European Capital of Culture Wrocław 2016. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2021.1989693
• Kajdanek, K., Błaszczyk, M., Banaszak, E., & Pluta, J. (n.d.). Stability and change in patterns of cultural participation in the events of the European Capital of Culture Wrocław 2016. Leisure Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2022.2066712
• Lähdesmäki, T. (2014). Discourses of Europeanness in the reception of the European Capital of Culture events: The case of Pécs 2010. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412448092
• Liu, Y. de. (2016). Event and Quality of Life: A Case Study of Liverpool as the 2008 Euro-pean Capital of Culture. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 11(3), 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-015-9391-1
• Liu, Y.-D. (2019). Event and Sustainable Culture-Led Regeneration: Lessons from the 2008 European Capital of Culture, Liverpool. Sustainability, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071869
• Meekes, J. F., Buda, D. M., & de Roo, G. (2017). Leeuwarden 2018: Complexity of leisure‐led regional development in a European Capital of Culture. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 108(1), 129–136.
• Pepe, A. (2018). The participatory process of a community involved in its biggest event: The case study “Matera European Capital of culture 2019”. In Capitale Culturale. https://doi.org/10.13138/2039-2362/1687
• Pluta, J., Banaszak, E., Błaszczyk, M., & Kajdanek, K. (2017). Participation in culture in the perspective of the European Capital of Culture Wrocław 2016. Report from CATI research with participation of the residents of Wrocław and the region of Lower Silesia.
• Richards, G. (2000). The European cultural capital event: Strategic weapon in the cultural arms race? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 6(2), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630009358119
• Richards, G., & Wilson, J. (2004). The impact of cultural events on city image: Rotterdam, cultural capital of Europe 2001. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000256323
• Šebová, M., Džupka, P., Hudec, O., & Urbančíková, N. (2014). Promoting and financing cultural tourism in Europe through European capitals of culture: A case study of Košice, European capital of culture 2013. Amfiteatru Economic, 16(36), 655–670.
• Tjarve, B., & Zemite, I. (2016). The role of cultural activities in community development. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664062151
• Tölle, A. (2013). Transnationalisation of development strategies in East Central European cities: A survey of the shortlisted Polish European Capital of Culture candidate cities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(3), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776413512845
• Tommarchi, E., Hansen, L. E., & Bianchini, F. (2018). Problematising the question of participation in Capitals of Culture. Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Stu-dies, 15(2), 154–169.
• Turşie, C. (2015). Re-inventing the centre-periphery relation by the European capitals of culture: case-studies; Marseille-Provence 2013 and Pecs 2010. Eurolimes, 19, 71–84.
• Urbančíková, N. (2018). European capitals of culture: What are their individualities? Theor-etical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management.
• Verhoeven, C.-A. (2013). Houdoe or Houdios? BrabantStad 2018: European Capital of Culture and the extent of identification of Brabant’s inhabitants. Exploring the Social Impacts of Events, 57–73.
• Wise, N., Aquilino, L., & Armenski, T. (2018). Preparing for Matera 2019: Local resident participation in research and perceptions of destination competitiveness. In Urban Book Series. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72311-2_9
• Yi-De Liu. (2016). Cultural Event and Urban Regeneration: Lessons from Liverpool as the 2008 European Capital of Culture. European Review.

Identifiers

DOI

10.35765/pk.2021.4001.16

Biblioteka Nauki

37500704