Digital Transformation and Its Social and Administrative-Legal Implications. From Homo Sapiens to Homo Digitalis

• Authors: Ewa Szewczyk

Abstracts

EN

The ongoing digital transformation that we are experiencing as humanity requires in-depth analysis at many levels of research. In the field of law and administrative procedure, the issue of automated administrative decision-making in individual cases is of particular importance. That is, the making and issuing of decisions in the process of applying the law. Against this background, a number of concerns and questions arise, not only of a legal nature, but also of a social nature, related to the perception of the human being in an intensely digitally changing reality. As can be surmised, never before in the development of administrative law has the consideration of ethical issues in the context of administrative procedure been so frequently addressed. One of the fundamental questions is whether this act of applying the law, hitherto performed by a human being, can be performed by a device/algorithm?

Keywords

EN

digital transformation; administrative law and procedure; automated administrative decision-making; artificial intelligence

• Publisher: Polska Akademia Nauk
• Journal: Teka Komisji Prawniczej
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 16
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 351-360

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Ewa Szewczyk

• University of Kalisz

• https://orcid.org/0000000229806564

References

• Bathaee, Yavar. 2018. “Introduction. The artificial intelligence black box and the failure of intent and causation.” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 31, no. 2:890-96.
• Campo, Enrico. 2022. Attention and its Crisis in Digital Society. https://www.routledge.com/Attention-and-its-Crisis-in-Digital-Society/Campo/p/book/9781032126401# [accessed: 03.04.2023].
• Coglianese, Cary, and David Lehr. 2017. “Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-Learning Era.” https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1734/ [accessed: 03.04.2023].
• Etscheid, Ian. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration, in Electronic Government.” Springer LNCS 11685. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-27325-5_19 [accessed: 26.11.2022].
• Kaim, Karolina. 2020. “Sztuczna inteligencja właścicielem praw do utworu bądź wynalazku?” https://www.parp.gov.pl/component/content/article/63599:sztuczna-inteligencja-wlascicielem-praw-do-utworu-badz-wynalazku [accessed: 06.04.2023].
• Mökander, Jacob, Jessica Morley, Mariarosaria Taddeo, et al. 2021. “Ethics-Based Auditing of Automated Decision-Making Systems: Nature, Scope, and Limitations.” https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-021-00319-4 [accessed: 10.02.2023].
• Oksanowicz, Paweł, and Aleksandra Przegalińska. 2023. Sztuczna inteligencja. Nieludzka, arcyludzka, https://books.google.pl/books?id=f73TDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT34&hl=pl&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=2#v=onepage&q&f=false [accessed: 10.02.2023].
• Piecha, Jacek. 2021. “Zastosowanie algorytmów sztucznej inteligencji a kontrola administracji publicznej.” In Maksymilian Cherka, Piotr Gołaszewski, Jacek Piecha, et al., Kryzys, stagnacja, renesans? Prawo administracyjne przyszłości. Księga Jubileuszowa profesora Jacka Jagielskiego, 786-87. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
• Skrabacz, Aleksandra, and Monika Lewińska-Krzak. 2022. “Wpływ rewolucji cyfrowej na rozwój społeczeństwa informacyjnego oraz społeczną wartość informacji.” Roczniki Nauk Społecznych XIV, no. 1:119-36.
• Tischner, Józef. 1982. “Etyka wartości nadziei.” In Wobec wartości, edited by Dietrich von Hildebrand, Jan Kłoczowski, et al. Poznań: W Drodze.
• Zalewski, Tomasz. 2020. “Definicja sztucznej inteligencji.” In Prawo sztucznej inteligencji, edited by Luigi Lai, and Marek Świerczyński. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.

Identifiers

DOI

10.32084/tkp.8105

Biblioteka Nauki

55991853