A Few Remarks About Challenges in Application of Restorative Justice: A Case Study of Bosnia and Herzegovina

• Authors: Ena Kazic , Rialda Ćorović

Abstracts

EN

Restorative justice is without any doubt one of the most important steps in the development of criminal law, which at the same time increased the level of humanity in the approach towards perpetrators and victims and managed to achieve the principle goals of criminal law. A few decades have passed since its idea and approach was borrowed from the traditional communities that among themselves applied it for centuries and it was transformed into the new approach of justice offering many benefits to the community where it is established. Formally, it has been more than 20 years since Bosnia and Herzegovina embraced restorative justice within its criminal law. This paper aims to discuss how much de facto it has been applied in this country and to present results of interviews with representatives from legal theory and practice where they refer to restorative justice and its major challenges for application and propose mechanisms for overcoming existing difficulties. In this article, the authors use normative, descriptive scientific methods and statistics and interviews as tools for the collection of data.

Keywords

EN

Criminal Law; Restorative Justice; Bosnia and Herzegovina; justice system; juveniles

• Publisher: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
• Journal: Review of European and Comparative Law
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 49
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 153-172

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Ena Kazic

• Faculty of Law, International University of Sarajevo

• https://orcid.org/0000000324672947

author

Rialda Ćorović

• High Judicial and Prosecutorial Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina

References

• Christie, Nils. “Conflict as Property.” The British Journal of Criminology 17, issue 1 (January 1977): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a046783.
• Clark, Janine Natalya . “The Three Rs: Retributive Justice, Restorative Justice and Reconciliation.”Contemporary Justice Review 11, no. 4. (November 2008): 3–4 . DOI:10.1080/10282580802482603.
• Ćorović, Rialda. Restorativna pravda u sistemu krivičnog pravosuđa [Restorative Justice in the Criminal Justice System]. Ph.D. diss. Saraejevo: University of Sarajevo, 2018.
• European Forum for Restorative Justice. Effectiveness of restorative justice practic es. An overview of empirical research on restorative justice practices in Europe. Leuven: EFRJ, 2017. 1–7. http://www .efrj.org.
• Fellegi, Borbala. Meeting The Challenges of Introducing VictimOffender Media tion in Central and Eastern Europe. Leuven: EFRJ, 2005.
• Gravielides, Theo. “Restorative justice-the perplexing concept: Conceptual fault-lines and power battles within the restorative justice move- ment.” Criminology and Criminal Justice 8(2) (May 2008): 165–183. DOI:10.1177/1748895808088993.
• Jones, Cooper. “Does Alternative Sentencing Reduce Recidivism? A Pre- liminary Analysis.” Xavier Journal of Politics, vol. 5 (2014–2015): 18–31 . https://www .xavier .edu/xjop/documents/vol5_2014/XJOP_Vol_V_2014_ Jones.pdf.
• Kazić, Ena, and Rialda Ćorović. “Restorative Justice Within Legal System of Bos- nia and Herzegovina.” In Restorative Approach and Social Innovation: From theoretical Grounds to Sustainable Practices edited by Grandi, Giovanni and Grigoletto, Simone, 168–189. Padua: University Press, 2019 .
• Kazić, Ena, and Rialda Ćorović. “Is Restorative Justice an Appropriate Legal Re- mediation for Sexual Violence.” Review of European and Comparative Law XXXVII (June 2019): 82–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/recl .4774.
• Kazić, Ena, and Dževad Mahmutović and, Mirza Ljubović. Primjena odgojnih preporuka kao oblika restorativne pravde u Kantonu Sarajevo u periodu 2012–2017 [ Application of Educational Recommendations as a form of Re storative Justice in the Canton Sarajevo for the period 2012–2017] . Sarajevo: International University of Sarajevo, 2019 .
• Laxminarayan, Malini. Accessibility and Initiation of Restorative Justic . Leuven: European Forum for Restorative Justice . 2011. Accessed August 14, 2021. https://www .euforumrj .org/sites/default/files/2019–11/accessibility_and_ initiation_of_rj_website .pdf .
• Marshal, Tony. Restorative Justice: an overview. USA: Research Development and Statistics Directorate, 1999.
• Maryfield, Bailey and Roger Przybylski, and Mark Myrent. Research on Restora- tive Justice Practices. USA:Justice Research and Statistics Association’s Brief Report, 2020 . Accessed September 1, 2021. https://www .jrsa .org/pubs/fact- sheets/jrsa-research-brief-restorative-justice .pdf .
• Ness, Daniel W. Van and Strong K Heetderks. Restoring Justice: An introduction to Restorative Justice. London and New York: Routledge, 2014.
• O’Brien, Sandra Pavelka. “Restorative Justice: Principles, Practices and Application.” The Prevention Researcher, no. 14 (December 2007):1–2 .
• Pruin, Ineke, Frieder Dunkel, and Grzywa Joanna. “The Implementation Of Al- ternative Sanctions And Measures Into Juvenile Justice Systems.” Romanian Journal of Sociology, no. 12 (2011): 16–50 .
• Kazić-Çakar, Ena. “Criminal law and pandemic: a brief overview of criminal law regulation of crimes against health in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” In Current Challenges of Human Rights, Rule of Law and Democracy, edited by Tabaszewski, Robert, Kazić Çakar, Ena, Shulzhenko, Nadiia, and Hypiak, Mateusz, 39–40. Poland: Wydawnictwo KUL, 2021 .
• “The Origins of Restorative Justice.” Accessed August 14, 2021. http://www.restorativeapproaches.eu/origins.
• United Nations. UN Handbook on RJ Programs . New York: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2006 . Accessed August 14, 2021. https://digitallibrary.un.org/re- cord/61757 .
• Zehr, Howard and Ali Gohar. The Little Book on Restorative Justice . USA: Good Book, 2003.

Identifiers

DOI

10.31743/recl.13478

Biblioteka Nauki

2106699