EN
A restriction concerning conducting business activity set out in the aforementioned provisions should refer to State property understood as a property of the State Treasury and the one of State legal persons. After an analysis, while agreeing with the view that tenancy (similarly to lease) should not be classified as an economic activity, and bearing in mind the principle that in view of the ambiguity of the regulations, norms determining the prohibition should not be interpreted restrictively, the author expresses a view that the prohibition provided in Article 34 para. 1 of the act does not apply to the lease of agricultural land by a Deputy to a company wholly owned by the State Treasury.