Ruchliwość społeczna jako przedmiot badań socjologicznych – podstawowe pojęcia i koncepcje, cele i znaczenie badań

• Authors: Tomasz Drabowicz

Title variants

EN

Sociological research on social mobility: concepts, aims, policy relevance

Abstracts

EN

The article discusses the key theories, concepts, and notions used in comparative research into intergenerational social class mobility. More specifically, it discusses the Featherman, Jones, and Hauser hypothesis about cross-national similarity in social class mobility, describes a distinction between absolute and relative social mobility, and presents the Erikson-Goldthorpe-Portocarero class scheme. After discussing the results of both classical and recent studies on intergenerational social class mobility, this paper deals with the evidence-based policy recommendations relevant for decision-makers who can influence within certain limits the extent to which the rate of intergenerational social mobility can be equalised.

Keywords

EN

comparative research; social class; social inequality; social mobility; equality of opportunity; social structure

• Publisher: Kancelaria Sejmu / Chancellery of the Sejm
• Journal: Studia BAS
• Year: 2020
• Issue: 2(62)
• Pages: 9-22

Dates

published

2020

Contributors

author

Tomasz Drabowicz

• Uniwersytet Łódzki

• https://orcid.org/000000027925696X

References

• Breen R., Intergenerational Mobility: Core Model of Social Fluidity [w:] The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, red. G. Ritzer, Wiley, London 2007, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosi057.
• Breen R., The Comparative Study of Social Mobility [w:] Social Mobility in Europe, red. R. Breen, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199258457.003.0001.
• Breen R., Luijkx R., Social Mobility in Europe between 1970 and 2000 [w:] Social Mobility in Europe, red. R. Breen, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199258457.003.0003.
• Bukodi E., Paskov M., Nolan B., Intergenerational Class Mobility in Europe: A New Account, „Social Forces” 2020, vol. 98, no. 3, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz026.
• Domański H., Przybysz D., Analiza przydatności schematu EGP jako wskaźnika pozycji społecznej, „ASK. Społeczeństwo. Badania. Metody” 2003, nr 12.
• Erikson R., Social Class of Men, Women and Families, „Sociology” 1984, vol. 18, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038584018004003.
• Erikson R., Goldthorpe J.H., The Constant Flux. A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1993.
• Erikson R., Goldthorpe J.H., Portocarero L., Intergenerational Class Mobility in Three Western European Societies: England, France and Sweden, „British Journal of Sociology” 1979, vol. 30, no. 4.
• Erikson R., Goldthorpe J.H., Portocarero L., Social Fluidity in Industrial Nations: England, France and Sweden, „British Journal of Sociology” 1982, vol. 33, no. 1.
• Esping-Andersen G., Społeczne podstawy gospodarki postindustrialnej, Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Pedagogicznej TWP, Warszawa 2010.
• Esping-Andersen G., Trzy światy kapitalistycznego państwa dobrobytu, Difin, Warszawa 2010.
• Esping-Andersen G., Welfare Regimes and Social Stratification, „Journal of European Social Policy” 2015, vol. 25, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928714556976.
• Esping-Andersen G., Wagner S., Asymmetries in the Opportunity Structure. Intergenerational Mobility Trends in Europe, „Research in Social Stratification and Mobility” 2012, vol. 30, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2012.06.001.
• EVS, 2010, European Values Study 2008, 4th Wave, Integrated Dataset, https://dx.doi.org/10.4232/1.10188.
• Featherman D.L., Jones F.L., Hauser R.M., Assumptions of Social Mobility Research in the US: The Case of Occupational Status, „Social Science Research” 1975, vol. 4, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(75)90002-2.
• Goldthorpe J.H., O socjologii: integracja badań i teorii, Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, Warszawa 2012.
• Gugushvili A., Political Democracy, Economic Liberalization and Macro-Sociological Models of Intergenerational Mobility, „Social Science Research” 2017, vol. 66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.06.003.
• Hout M., DiPrete T.A., What Have We Learned: RC28’s Contributions to Knowledge about Social Stratification, „Research in Social Stratification and Mobility” 2006, vol. 24, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2005.
• 10.001.
• Lipset S.M., Zetterberg H.L., Social Mobility in Industrial Societies [w:] Social Mobility in Industrial Society, red. S.M. Lipset, R. Bendix, University of California Press, Berkeley 1959.
• Lissowski G., Zastosowanie modeli logarytmiczno-liniowych do analizy związków między wieloma zmiennymi jakościowymi, „Studia Socjologiczne” 1984, t. 2, nr 93.
• Penissat É., Rowell J., Note de recherché sur la fabrique de la nomenclature socio-économique européene ESeC, „Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales” 2012, vol. 191–192, no. 1.
• Przybysz D., Modele logarytmiczno-liniowe dla zmiennych porządkowych. Przykłady zastosowania, „ASK. Społeczeństwo. Badania. Metody” 2004, nr 13.
• Rose D., Harrison E., Social Class in Europe: An Introduction to the European Socio–Economic Classification, Routledge, London 2010.
• Social Mobility in Europe, red. R. Breen, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199258457.001.0001.
• Sorokin P., Ruchliwość społeczna, Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, Warszawa 2009.
• Wesołowski W., Mach B., Unfulfilled Systemic Functions of Social Mobility: II. the Polish Case, „International Sociology” 1986, vol. 1, no. 2, https://doi.org/10.1177/026858098600100204.
• Zagórski K., Transformations of Social Structure and Social Mobility in Poland, „International Journal of Sociology” 1977, vol. 7, no. 3–4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15579336.1977.11769672

Identifiers

DOI

10.31268/StudiaBAS.2020.10

Biblioteka Nauki

2895348