Propozycja unijnych ram prawnych dobrowolnej certyfikacji pochłaniania dwutlenku węgla - przyczynek do dyskusji

• Authors: Małgorzata Bryk-Zwolska

Title variants

EN

Proposal for the European Union certification framework for carbon removals – a contribution to the discussion

Abstracts

EN

Recognizing the relevance of carbon dioxide removal to achieving global climate goals and the European Union's objectives, the European Commission, on 30th November 2022, announced proposal for a regulation on an EU certification for carbon removals (CDR). The EU's effort to create a CDR certification scheme is an important initiative in this regard but faces key challenges that should be resolved during the ongoing legislative processes. The purpose of this paper is to assess the content of the proposed regulation from the perspective of its effectiveness as a climate tool.

Keywords

EN

carbon dioxide removal; CDR; climate policy; climate change; European Union

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
• Journal: Prawne Problemy Górnictwa i Ochrony Środowiska
• Year: 2024
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 1-18

Dates

published

2024

Contributors

author

Małgorzata Bryk-Zwolska

• Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach Polska

• https://orcid.org/0000000295094964

References

• Arcusa S., Sprenkle-Hyppolite S., Snapshot of the carbon dioxide removal certification and standards ecosystem (2021–2022), „Climate Policy” 2022, vol. 22, issue 9/10, s. 1319–1332, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2094308.
• Bäckstrand K., Lövbrand E., Planting trees to mitigate climate change: Contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism, „Global Environmental Politics” 2006, vol. 6, issue 1, s. 50–75, https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2006.6.1.50.
• Carton W. et al., Negative emissions and the long history of carbon removal, „WIREs ClimateChange” 2020, vol. 11, issue 6, s. 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.671.
• Ciechanowicz-McLean J., Instrumenty prawne ochrony klimatu przed i w Europejskim Zielonym Ładzie, „Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze” 2021, nr 3, s. 9–20, https://doi.org/10.26881/gsp.2021.3.01.
• Ejdys J., Szpilko D., European Green Deal – research directions: A systematic literature review, „Economics and Environment” 2022, vol. 81, no. 2, s. 8–38, https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2022.81.2.455.
• Fuhrman J. et al., Diverse carbon dioxide removal approaches could reduce impacts on the energy – water – land system, „Nature Climate Change” 2023, vol. 13, issue 4, s. 341–350, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01604-9.
• Ghaleigh N.S., Macinante J., Déjà vu all over again: Carbon dioxide removals (CDR) and legal liability, „Journal of Environmental Law” 2023, vol. 35, issue 3, s. 377–400, https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqad022.
• Honegger M., Toward the effective and fair funding of CO2 removal technologies, „Nature Communications” 2023, vol. 14, article 534, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36199-4.
• Keith D.W., Why capture CO2 from the atmosphere?, „Science” 2009, vol. 325, issue 5948, s. 1654–1655, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1175680.
• Köhler P., Hartmann J., Wolf-Gladrow D.A., Geoengineering potential of artificially enhanced silicate weathering of olivine, „Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences” 2010, vol. 107, no. 47, s. 20228–20233, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000545107.
• Kollmuss A., Schneider L., Zhezherin V., Has Joint Implementation reduced GHG emissions? Lessons learned for the design of carbon market mechanisms, Working Paper no. 2015-07, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm 2015, SEI [online], https://mediamanager.sei. org/documents/Publications/Climate/SEI-WP-2015-07-JI-lessons-for-carbon-mechs.pdf [dostęp: 20.12.2023].
• Lehmann J., A handful of carbon, „Nature” 2007, no. 447, s. 143–144, https://doi.org/10.1038/447143a.
• Lundberg L., Fridahl M., The missing piece in policy for carbon dioxide removal: Reverse auctions as an interim solution, „Discover Energy” 2022, vol. 2, article 3, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43937-022-00008-8.
• Nabuurs G.J. et al., Effects of the EU-LULUCF regulation on the use of biomass for bio-energy, Wageningen Environmental Research, Report 2886, Wageningen 2018, Wageningen University & Research [online], https://edepot.wur.nl/449788 [dostęp: 20.12.2023].
• Osaka S., Bellamy R., Castree N., Framing „nature-based” solutions to climate change, „WIREs Climate Change” 2021, vol. 12, issue 5, article e729, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.729.
• Przybojewska I., Greenwashing w kontekście unormowań prawnych, „Prawne Problemy Górnictwa i Ochrony Środowiska” 2022, nr 1, s. 1–26, https://doi.org/10.31261/PPGOS.2022.01.07.
• Przybojewska I., Instrumenty rynkowe w prawie ochrony środowiska Unii Europejskiej, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2021.
• Przybojewska I., Mechanizm dostosowywania cen na granicach (CBAM) i stopniowa eliminacja bezpłatnych uprawnień emisyjnych dla sektorów zagrożonych ucieczką emisji w ramach
• EU ETS – czy gra jest warta świeczki?, „Prawne Problemy Górnictwa i Ochrony Środowiska” 2023, nr 2, s. 1–29, https://doi.org/10.31261/PPGOS.2023.02.02.
• Rickels W. et al., Integrating carbon dioxide removal into European emissions trading, „Frontiers in Climate” 2021, vol. 3, article 690023, https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.690023.
• Schenuit F., Geden O., Carbon dioxide removal: Climbing up the EU climate policy agenda, w: Handbook on European Union climate change policy and politics, eds. T. Rayner et al., Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton 2023, s. 322–336, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906981.
• Schuiling R.D., Krijgsman P., Enhanced silicate weathering: An effective and cheap tool to sequester CO2, „Climate Change” 2006, vol. 74, s. 349–354, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-3485-y.
• Scott V., Geden O., The challenge of carbon dioxide removal for EU policy-making, „Nature Energy” 2018, no. 3, s. 350–352, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0124-1.
• Sekera J. et al., Carbon dioxide removal: What’s worth doing? A biophysical and public need perspective, „PLOS Climate” 2023, no. 2, issue 2, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000124.
• Shaffer G., Long-term effectiveness and consequences of carbon dioxide sequestration, „Nature Geoscience” 2010, vol. 3, s. 464–467, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo896.
• Smith P. et al., Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions, „Nature Climate Change” 2016, vol. 6, issue 1, s. 42–50, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2870.
• Smith S. et al., State of carbon dioxide removal − 1st edition, OSF [online], 2023, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/W3B4Z.
• Ślażyńska-Kluczek D., Analiza greenwashingu w kontekście emisji długu zrównoważonego, „Przegląd Prawno-Ekonomiczny” 2023, nr 3, s. 81–100, https://doi.org/10.31743/ppe.16212.
• IPCC, Annex I: Glossary, ed. J.B.R. Matthews, w: Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, eds. V. Masson-Delmotte et al., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York 2018, s. 541–562, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.008.
• IPCC, Summary for policymakers, w: Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change, the contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds. P.R. Shukla et al., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York 2022, s. 1–48, IPCC [online], https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FullReport.pdf [dostęp: 20.12.2023].
• IPCC, Summary for policymakers, w: Climate change and land: An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems, eds. P.R. Shukla et al., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York 2019, s. 1–36, IPPC [online], https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/4/2022/11/SRCCL_SPM.pdf [dostęp: 20.12.2023].
• Krajowy Ośrodek Bilansowania i Zarządzania Emisjami, Propozycja nowych unijnych ram certyfikacji usuwania dwutlenku węgla, w: Raport z rynku CO2, 2022, nr 129, s. 25–27, KOBiZE [online], https://www.kobize.pl/uploads/materialy/materialy_do_pobrania/raport_co2/2022/
• KOBiZE_Analiza_rynku_CO2_grudzie%C5%84_2022.pdf [dostęp: 20.12.2023]. Register of Commission expert groups and other similar entities, European Commission [online], https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/expert-groups-register/screen/expert-groups/consult?lang=en&groupID=3861 [dostęp: 20.12.2023].
• Scherger S., Carbon farming: How big corporations are driving the EU’s carbon removals agenda, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy [online], 28.11.2022, https://www.iatp. org/big-corporations-driving-eus-carbon-farming-agenda [dostęp: 20.12.2023].

Identifiers

DOI

10.31261/PPGOS.2024.02.02

Biblioteka Nauki

46618209