Navigating Troubled Waters: Evaluating the Function and Material Legitimacy of European Criminal Law

• Authors: Raquel Cardoso

Abstracts

EN

The question of the function of European criminal law has dominated recent doctrinal thinking. In order to answer that question, a thorough study on the guiding principles of criminalisation and their applicability to the European Union’s legislative process was necessary. This article focusses first on the concept of legitimacy and the need for a European criminal policy, and then on some principles that already exist in the EU’s legal order and their ability to provide said legitimacy. Following the conclusion that the existing principles are insufficient, it is suggested that the harm principle and the principle of protection of legal goods would be more appropriate to evaluate the material legitimacy of European criminal law. For that purpose, the multiple categories of interests that coexist in the EU will be analysed according to the allocation of responsibility for their protection. That distinction will, in turn, lead to the proposal of a three-step process to assess any given instance of criminalisation stemming from the EU. Finally, the practical consequences of such a process will be mentioned in the conclusion.

Keywords

EN

criminalisation process; function of criminal law; harm principle; legal good; material legitimacy

• Publisher: Polska Akademia Nauk
• Journal: Polish Yearbook of International Law
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 43
• Pages: 95-122

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Raquel Cardoso

• Faculty of Law of Lusíada University, Portugal

• https://orcid.org/0000000313369192

References

• 2979th Council meeting (Justice and Home Affairs), Brussels, 30 November 2009.
• Acale Sánchez M., Derecho Penal y Tratado de Lisboa, 12(30) Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 349 (2008), pp. 349–380.
• Almeida Costa A., Function of the Criminal Law, in: P. Caeiro, S. Gless, V. Mitsilegas (eds.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Crime and Criminal Justice, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham: 2024, pp. 492–501.
• Amaral Rodrigues J., O Direito Penal Europeu e a dupla subsidiariedade. Competência Penal da União Europeia, Condições do seu Exercício e Compatibilidade com o Paradigma da Protecção Subsidiária de Bens Jurídicos, Almedina, Coimbra: 2019.
• Ambos K., The Overall Function of International Criminal Law: Striking the Right Balance Between the Rechtsgut and the Harm Principles, 9 Criminal Law and Philosophy 301 (2015), pp. 301–329.
• Bacigalupo E., Rechtsgutsbegriff und Grenzen des Strafrechts, in: M. Pawlik, R. Zaczyk (eds.), Festschrift für Günther Jakobs zum 70. Geburtstag am 26. Juli 2007, Carl Heymanns Verlag, Cologne: 2007, pp. 12–13.
• Beetham D., The Legitimation of Power, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills: 2013.
• Bernardi A., Strategie per l’armonizzazione dei sistemi penali europei, in: S. Canestrari, L. Foffani (eds.), Il Diritto Penale nella Prospettiva Europea. Quali Politiche Criminali per quale Europa?, Giuffrè, Milano: 2005, pp. 377–449.
• Blomsma J., Peristeridou C., The Way Forward: A General Part of European Criminal Law, in: F. Galli, A. Weyembergh (eds.), Approximation of Substantive Criminal Law in the EU: The Way Forward, Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, Brusseles: 2013, pp. 117–138.
• Boister N., An Introduction to Transnational Criminal Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2012.
• Braum S., Are We Heading Towards a European Form of “Enemy Criminal Law”? On the Compatibility of Jakob’s Conception of “an Enemy Criminal Law” and European Criminal Law, in: F. Galli, A. Weyembergh (eds.), EU Counter-Terrorism Offences: What Impact on National Legislation and Case-Law?, Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, Brusseles: 2012, pp. 237–250.
• Buisman S.S., The Future of EU Substantive Criminal Law: Towards a Uniform Set of Criminalisation Principles at the EU Level, 30 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 161 (2022), pp. 161–187.
• Caeiro P., Beyond Competence Issues: Why and How Should the EU Legislate on Criminal Sanctions?, in: R. Kert, A. Lehner (eds.), Vielfalt des Strafrechts im internationalen Kontext. Festschrift für Frank Höpfel zum 65. Geburtstag, Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Wein: 2018, pp. 645–665.
• Caeiro P., Constitution and Development of the European Union’s Penal Jurisdiction: Responsibility, Self-Reference and Attribution, 27(4–6) European Law Journal 441 (2021), pp. 441–462.
• Caeiro P., Perspectivas de formação de um Direito Penal da União Europeia, in: E. Correia (ed.), Direito Penal Económico e Europeu: Textos Doutrinários, Coimbra Editora, Coimbra: 1998, pp. 519–529.
• Caeiro P., The Relationship Between European and International Criminal Law (and the Absent(?) Third), in: V. Mitsilegas, M. Bergstrom, T. Konstadinides (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Criminal Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham: 2016, pp. 580–602.
• Carrera S., Guild E., The European Council’s Guidelines for the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice 2020: Subverting the “Lisbonisation” of Justice and Home Affairs?, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels: 2014.
• Case C-108/80 Criminal proceedings against René Joseph Kugelmann, EU:C:1981:36.
• Case C-59/75 Pubblico Ministero v. Flavia Manghera and others, EU:C:1976:14.
• Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12 Digital Rights Ireland, EU:C:2014:238.
• Conservation of Marine Biological Resources: Commission Requests Portugal to Respect the Exclusive Competence of the EU Under the Common Fisheries Policy, European Commission, available at: https://oceans-and-fsheries.ec.europa.eu/news/conservation-marine-biological-resources-commissionrequests-portugal-respect-exclusive-competence-2018-01-26_en (accessed 30 August 2024).
• Council Directive 2002/90/EC of 28 November 2002 Defning the Facilitation of Unauthorised Entry, Transit and Residence [2002] OJ L 328/17.
• Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on Combating Certain Forms and Expressions of Racism and Xenophobia by Means of Criminal Law [2008] OJ L 328/55.
• Decision 2002/946/JHA of 28 November 2002 on the Strengthening of the Penal Framework to
• Prevent the Facilitation of Unauthorised Entry, Transit and Residence [2002] OJ L 328/1.
• Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on Combating Terrorism [2017] OJ L 88/6.
• Directive 2011/93/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on Combating the Sexual Abuse and Sexual Exploitation of Children and Child Pornography [2011] OJ L 335/1.
• Duff R.A., Towards a Theory of Criminal Law?, 84(1) Aristotelian Society Supplementary 1 (2010), pp. 1–28.
• Dworkin G., The Limits of the Criminal Law, in: J. Deigh, D. Dolinko (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Criminal Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2011, pp. 3–16.
• Elholm T., Colson R., The Symbolic Purpose of EU Criminal Law, in: R. Colson, S. Field (eds.), EU Criminal Justice and the Challenges of Diversity: Legal Cultures in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2016, pp. 48–64
• European Commission, Proposal for a Council Decision on adding the violation of Union restrictive measures to the areas of crime laid down in Article 83(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Brussels, 25 May 2022, COM(2022) 247 fnal, available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2022%3A0247%3AFIN (accessed 30 August 2024).
• European Parliament resolution of 22 May 2012 on an EU Approach to Criminal Law (2010/2310(INI), 13 September 2013, OJ C 264E/7.
• Figueiredo Dias J. de, Direito Penal. Parte Geral. Tomo I, Coimbra Editora, Coimbra: 2007.
• German Constitutional Court, Lissabon Urteil 2BvE 2/08, 30 June 2009.
• Gomes L.F., Globalización y Derecho Penal, in: J. Ripollés, J. Cerezo Mir (eds.), La Ciencia del Derecho Penal ante el Nuevo Siglo. Libro Homenaje al Profesor Doctor Don José Cerezo Mir, Tecnos, Madrid: 2002, pp. 331–348.
• Grasso G., Comunità europee e diritto penale. I rapporti tra l’ordinamento comunitario e i sistemi penali degli Stati membri, Giuffré, Milano: 1989.
• Harding C., Öberg J., The Journey of EU Criminal Law on the Ship of Fools: What Are the Implications for Supranational Governance of EU Criminal Justice Agencies?, 28(2) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 192 (2021), pp. 192–211.
• Herlin-Karnell E., Effectiveness and Constitutional Limits in European Criminal Law, 5(3) New Journal of European Criminal Law 267 (2014), pp. 267–273.
• Herlin-Karnell E., European Criminal Law as an Exercise in EU “Experimental” Constitutional Law, 20(3) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 442 (2013), pp. 442–464.
• Herlin-Karnell E., The Constitutional Dimension of European Criminal Law, Hart Publishing, Portland: 2012.
• Hert P. de, Wieczorek I., Testing the Principle of Subsidiarity in EU Criminal Policy: The Omitted Exercise in the Recent EU Documents on Principles for Substantive European Criminal Law, 3(3–4) New Journal of European Criminal Law 394 (2012), pp. 394–411.
• Huomo-Kettunen M., EU Criminal Policy at a Crossroads Between Effectiveness and Traditional Restraints for the Use of Criminal Law, 5(3) New Journal of European Criminal Law 301 (2014), pp. 301–326.
• Kaiafa-Gbandi M., Approximation of Substantive Criminal Law Provisions in the EU and Fundamental Principles of Criminal Law, in: F. Galli, A. Weyembergh (eds.), Approximation of Substantive Criminal Law in the EU: The Way Forward, Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, Brussels: 2013, pp. 85–116.
• Kettunen M., Legitimizing European Criminal Law: Justifcation and Restrictions, Springer, New York: 2020.
• Klabbers J., Setting the Scene, in: J. Klabbers, A. Peters, G. Ulfstein (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2011, pp. 1–44.
• Mak V., Standards of Protection: In Search of the “Average Consumer” of EU Law in the Proposal for a Consumer Rights Directive, 18 European Review of Private Law 25 (2010), pp. 25–42.
• Malanda S.R., Un nuevo modelo de Derecho Penal Transnacional: el Derecho Penal de la Unión Europea tras el Tratado de Lisboa, 32 Estudios Penales y Criminológicos 313 (2012), pp. 313–386.
• Mancano L., A Theory of Justice? Securing the Normative Foundations of EU Criminal Law Through an Integrated Approach to Independence, 27(4–6) European Law Journal 477 (2021), pp. 477–501.
• Mir Puig S., El sistema del Derecho Penal en la Europa Actual, in: B. Schünemann, J. Figueiredo Dias, J.M. Silva Sánchez (eds.), Fundamentos de un Sistema Europeo del Derecho Penal, José María Bosch Editor, Barcelona: 1995, pp. 25–36.
• Miranda Rodrigues A., Direito penal europeu pós-Lisboa: um direito penal funcionalista?, 146(4004) Revista de Legislação e de Jurisprudência 320 (2017), pp. 320–334.
• Mitsilegas V., EU Criminal Law, Hart Publishing, Portland: 2022.
• Mitsilegas V., European Criminal Law and Resistance to Communautarisation after Lisbon, 1(4) New Journal of European Criminal Law 458 (2010), pp. 458–480.
• Mitsilegas V., The EU External Border as a Site of Preventive (In)justice, 28(4–6) European Law Journal 263 (2022), pp. 263–280.
• Moccia S., La politica criminale del Corpus Juris: dal Corpus Juris al Diritto Penale Europeo?, in: A.S. Franco (ed.), Escritos em Homenagem a Alberto Silva Franco, Editora Revista dos Tribunais, São Paulo: 2003, pp. 364–391.
• Monar J., Reflections on the Place of Criminal Law in the European Construction, 27 (4–6) European Law Journal 356 (2022), pp. 356–367.
• Muñoz de Morales Romero M., El Legislador Penal Europeo: Legitimidad y Racionalidad, Aranzadi, Navarra: 2011.
• Mylonopoulos C., Strafrechtsdogmatik in Europa nach dem Vertrag von Lissabon – Zur materiellen Legitimation des Europäisches Strafrechts, 123(3) Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 633 (2011), pp. 633–650.
• Nations Security Council, Princeton University Press, Princeton: 2007.
• Nieto Martín A., A Necessary Triangle: The Science of Legislation, the Constitutional Control of Criminal Laws and Experimental Legislation, in: A. Nieto Martín, M. Muñoz de Morales Romero (eds.), Towards a Rational Legislative Evaluation in Criminal Law, Springer, New York: 2016, pp. 351–384.
• Nieto Martín A., Saudade of the Constitution: The Relationship Between Constitutional and Criminal Law in the European Context, 10(1) New Journal of European Criminal Law 28 (2019), pp. 28–33.
• Nieto Martín A., Strafrecht und Verfassung in der Ära des Global Law, in: S. Reindl-Krauskopf, I. Zerbes, W. Brandstetter, P. Lewisch, A. Tipold (eds.), Festschrift für Helmut Fuchs, Verlag Österreich, Wien: 2014, p. 348.
• Note from the Presidency to the Council of 28 May 2019, The Future of EU Substantive Criminal Law – Policy Debate, Council document 9726/19.
• Öberg J., Do We Really Need Criminal Sanctions for the Enforcement of EU Law?, 5(3) New Journal of European Criminal Law 370 (2014), pp. 370–387.
• Öberg J., Normative Justifcations of EU Criminal Law: European Public Goods and Transnational Interests, 27(4–6) European Law Journal 408 (2023), pp. 408–425.
• Opinion of the European Commission, Towards an EU Criminal Policy: Ensuring the Effective Implementation of EU Policies Through Criminal Law, Brussels, 20 September 2011, COM(2011) 573 final, available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0573 (accessed 30 August 2024)
• Ouwerkerk J.W., Old Wine in a New Bottle: Shaping the Foundations of EU Criminal Law Through the Concept of Legal Interests (Rechtsgüter), 27(4–6) European Law Journal 426 (2022), pp. 426–440.
• Palumblo F., Studi di Diritto Penale Comunitario, Giuffrè, Milano: 1999.
• Paoli L., How to Tackle (Organized) Crime in Europe? The EU Policy Cycle on Serious and Organized Crime and the New Emphasis on Harm, 22(1) European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 1 (2014), pp. 1–12.
• Pernice I., Harmonization of Legislation in Federal Systems: Constitutional, Federal and Subsidiarity Aspects, in: I. Pernice (ed.), Harmonization of Legislation in Federal Systems: Constitutional, Federal and Subsidiarity Aspects – The European Union and the United States of America Compared, Nomos, Baden Baden: 1996, pp. 13–25.
• Persak N., Criminalising Hate Crime and Hate Speech at EU Level: Extending the List of Eurocrimes Under Article 83(1) TFEU, 33(2) Criminal Law Forum 85 (2022), pp. 85–119.
• Persak N., Criminalizing Harmful Conduct: The Harm Principle, Its Limits and Continental Counterparts, Springer, New York: 2007.
• Persak N., Principles of EU Criminalisation and Their Varied Normative Strength: Harm and Effectiveness, 27(4–6) European Law Journal 463 (2022), pp. 463–476.
• Picotti L., Las Relaciones entre Derecho Penal y Derecho Comunitario: Estado Actual y Perspectivas, 13 Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminología 151 (2004), pp. 151–197.
• Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of 16 April 2014 on market abuse (market abuse regulation) and repealing Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directives 2003/124/EC, 2003/125/EC and 2004/72/EC [2014] OJ L 173/1.
• Safferling C., Europe as Transnational Law – A Criminal Law for Europe: Between National Heritage and Transnational Necessities, 10(10) German Law Journal 1383 (2009), pp. 1383–1397.
• Salcuni G., L’Europeizzazione del Diritto Penale: Problemi e Prospettive, Giuffrè, Milano: 2011.
• Sánchez Lázaro F., Evaluation and European Criminal Law: The Evaluation Model of the Commission, in: A. Nieto Martín, M. Muñoz de Morales Romero (eds.), Towards a Rational Legislative Evaluation in Criminal Law, Springer, New York: 2016, pp. 201–225.
• Satzger H., Europäische Autopsie – eine Untersuchung der rechtsstaatlichen Leichen im Fundament der europäischen Strafrechtspflege, in: R. Hefendehl (ed.), Empirische und dogmatische Fundamente, kriminalpolitischer Impetus. Symposium für Bernd Schünemann zum 60. Geburtstag, Carl Heymanns Verlag, Cologne: 2005, pp. 305–314.
• Satzger H., International and European Criminal Law, C.H. Beck, München: 2012.
• Schünemann B., The Contribution of Scientifc Projects to a European Criminal Law: An Alternative Project for a European Criminal Law and Procedure, in: M. Cherif Bassiouni, V. Militello, H. Satzger (eds.), European Cooperation in Penal Matters: Issues and Perspectives, CEDAM, Padova: 2008, pp. 126–151.
• Sieber U., Die Zukunft des Europäischen Strafrechts, 121(1) Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 1 (2009), pp. 1–67.
• Silva Dias A., De que Direito Penal precisamos nós europeus? Um olhar sobre algumas propostas recentes de constituição de um Direito Penal Comunitário, in: J. de Faria Costa, M.A. Marques da Silva (eds.), Direito Penal Especial, Processo Penal e Direitos Fundamentais: Visão Luso-Brasileira, Almedina, Coimbra: 2006, pp. 305–323.
• Sotis C., «Criminaliser sans punir». Réflexions sur le pouvoir d’incrimination (Directe et indirecte) de l’Union européenne prévu par le traité de Lisbonne, 4 Revue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé 773 (2010), pp. 773–785.
• Steffek J., The Legitimation of International Governance: A Discourse Approach, 9(2) European Journal of International Relations 249 (2003), pp. 249-275.
• Suominen A., Effectiveness and Functionality of Substantive EU Criminal Law, 5(3) New Journal of European Criminal Law 388 (2014), pp. 388–415.
• Vervaele J., European Criminal Justice in the Post-Lisbon Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, Università degli Studi di Trento, Trento: 2014.
• Weiβer B., Strafgesetzgebung durch die Europäische Union: Nicht nur ein Recht, sondern auch eine Pflicht?, 161(8) Goltdammer’s Archiv für Strafrecht 433 (2014), pp. 433–452.
• Wieczorek I., The Legitimacy of EU Criminal Law, Bloomsbury Publishing, Portland: 2020.
• Wieczorek I., Vavoula N., The Constitutional Signifcance of EU Criminal Law, 6(1) New Journal of European Criminal Law 5 (2015), pp. 5–7.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24425/pyil.2024.152295

Biblioteka Nauki

56079416