A scientometric view at real estate issues in risk management: Management research versus finance research

• Authors: Iwona Gorzeń-Mitka

Abstracts

EN

PURPOSE: The aim of the paper is to map the thematic landscape of real estate research in the context of risk management and to contribute to the identification and exploration of relationships between specific constructs in the management versus finance research. DESIGN/METHOD: This article applies some scientometric techniques. A combination of topic mapping has been used, as well as the author’s and journal co-citation analyses, and overlay visualisation of main and new topics in these fields. For the purposes of bibliometric analysis, the following tools and techniques have been used: trend analysis of the number of publications, citation analysis, the word co-occurrence method, and clustering (cluster analysis). The VOSviewer software and the data analysis tools available in the SCOPUS database were used for the analysis. RESULTS/FINDINGS: The main findings of this study are: the study of real estate issues in the context of risk management is a relatively new trend in academic research, which has been intensified over the past 10 years; the problems are studied mainly from the point of view of management research, financial research and engineering research; most of the leading researchers in this field combine aspects of management with aspects of finance in their studies; a relatively new trend in the study of the real estate issues in the context of risk management is the research on the use of artificial intelligence and the analysis of the impact of climate change on these processes. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This article makes the important contribution to real estate research in the context of risk management in management research and finance research. The analyses revealed some patterns of convergence and divergence and the diversity of topics, specialisation, and interdisciplinary engagement in the context of real estate issues in the context of risk management in management and finance research, thus offering the latest insights into the state-of-the-art of the fields.

Keywords

EN

real estate; risk management; scientometric analysis

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
• Journal: Studies in Risk and Sustainable Development
• Year: 2022
• Issue: 396
• Pages: 1-12

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Iwona Gorzeń-Mitka

• Czestochowa University of Technology, Faculty of Management, Poland

References

• Battisti, E., Shams, S. M. R., Sakka, G., & Miglietta, N. (2020). Big data and risk management in business processes: Implications for corporate real estate. Business Process Management Journal, 26(5), 1141-1155. https://doi:10.1108/BPMJ-03-2019-0125
• Bergmann, P., Kamarás, E., Gleißner, W., & Guenther, E. (2020). Enhanced cash flow valuation in real estate management by integrating innovative materials and risk assessment. Sustainability, 12(6). https://doi:10.3390/su12062201
• Chandra, Y. (2018). Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurship as a field of research (1990–2013): A scientometric analysis. PLoS ONE, 13(1):e0190228. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190228
• Crovini, C., Ossola, G., & Britzelmaier, B. (2021). How to reconsider risk management in SMEs? An advanced, reasoned and organised literature review. European Management Journal, 39(1), 118-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.11.002
• Eckles, D., Hoyt, R., & Miller, S. (2014). Reprint of: The impact of enterprise risk management on the marginal cost of reducing risk: Evidence from the insurance industry. Journal of Banking and Finance, 43, 247-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.02.007
• Ejdys, J. (2016). Problematyka społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu jako obiekt naukowych zainteresowań – wyniki analizy bibliometrycznej. Przegląd Organizacji, 4, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.33141/po.2016.04.06
• Fabozzi, F. J., Stanescu, S., & Tunaru, R. (2013). Commercial real estate risk management with derivatives. Journal of Portfolio Management, 39(5), 111-119. https://doi:10.3905/jpm.2013.39.5.111
• Ferreira de Araújo Lima, P., Crema, M., & Verbano, C. (2020). Risk management in SMEs: A systematic review and future directions. European Management Journal, 38(1), 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.005
• Fisher, J. D. (2005). New strategies for commercial real estate investment and risk management. Journal of Portfolio Management, 31(SPEC. ISS.), 154-161+10. https://doi:10.3905/jpm.2005.593898
• Florio, C., & Leoni, G. (2017). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The Italian case. The British Accounting Review, 49(1), 56-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.08.003
• Gleibner, W., & Wiegelmann, T. (2012). Quantitative methods for risk management in the real estate development industry. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 30(6), https://doi.org/10.1108/jpif.2012.11230faa.002
• Goorah, A. (2007). Real estate risk management with copulas. Journal of Property Research, 24(4), 289-311. https://doi:10.1080/09599910801916162
• Gorzeń-Mitka, I. (2020). The latest streams of research on communication in risk management: A large-scale literaturę review based on co-occurrence data. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie/Politechnika Śląska, 149, 219-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2020.149.20
• Heinze, I., & Henschel, T. (2021). Risk(ing) sophistication: Towards a structural equation model for risk management in small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, in press. https://www.inderscience.com/info/ingeneral/forthcoming.php?jcode=ijesb
• Hopkin, P. (2010). Fundamentals of risk management: Understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management. London, England; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; New Delhi, India: Kogan Page.
• Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). The value of enterprise risk management. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(4), 795-822. https://doi:10.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01413.x
• Kole, E., Koedijk, K., & Verbeek, M. (2007). Selecting copulas for risk management. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(8), 2405-2423. https://doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.09.010
• Pagach, D., & Wieczorek-Kosmala, M. (2020). The challenges and opportunities for ERM Post-COVID-19: Agendas for future research. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(12), 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13120323
• Schroeder, M. (2013). Environmental insurance: A risk management tool for real estate. Environmental Claims Journal, 25(2), 99-110. https://doi:10.1080/10406026.2013.781471
• Sipa, M. (2019). The interdisciplinary character of talent management. Zeszyty Naukowe UPH seria Administracja i Zarządzanie, 48(121), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.34739/zn.2019.48.03
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
• Van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. (2021). VOSviewer Manual. Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.17, software documentation. Retrieved October 25, 2021 from http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.17.pdf
• VOS (2021). VOSviewer software. Retrieved October 25, 2021 from http://www.vosviewer.com
• Yang, S., Ishtiaq, M., & Anwar, M. (2018). Enterprise risk management practices and firm performance, the mediating role of competitive advantage and the moderating role of financial literacy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 11(35), 1-17. https://doi:10.3390/jrfm11030035
• Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Tamošaitiene, J. (2010). Risk assessment of construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16(1), 33-46. https://doi:10.3846/jcem.2010.03
• Zou, X., Yue, W. L., & Vu, H. L. (2018). Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domain of road safety studies. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 118, 131-145. https://doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.06.010

Identifiers

DOI

10.22367/srsd.2022.396.3

Biblioteka Nauki

2076935