Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | 2 | 37 | 5-27

Article title

Erratic views and policy inconsistency on privatisation modalities in Ethiopia: implications on the performance of firms in the international market. A systematic review

Content

Title variants

PL
Błędne poglądy i niespójność polityki w zakresie warunków prywatyzacji w Etiopii: implikacje dla wyników firm na rynku międzynarodowym - przegląd systematyczny

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
Cel: Od 1991 r. kilka przedsiębiorstw państwowych w różnych kategoriach zostało przeniesionych do sektora prywatnego w ramach polityki prywatyzacji w Etiopii. Proces i jego warunki różnią się między sobą. Założeniem procesu prywatyzacji było przeniesienie nieefektywnych przedsiębiorstw państwowych do sektora prywatnego z nadzieją na poprawę ich wyników. Procesy prywatyzacyjne nie są jednak ani jednorazowe, ani natychmiastowe. Procesy prywatyzacyjne są powiązane z różnymi politykami i reformami makro- i mikroekonomicznymi, a czasami także społeczno-politycznymi. W niniejszym artykule przeanalizowano warunki prywatyzacji, niespójności i argumenty dotyczące procesu prywatyzacji w Etiopii. Materiały i metody badawcze: Wykorzystując proces systematycznego przeglądu literatury, znaleziono i wyodrębniono metodycznie 50 stron z baz danych PubMed, Ecobiz i Google Scholar. Analizę przeprowadzono zgodnie z systematycznymi kategoriami, biorąc pod uwagę heterogeniczność artykułów na temat procesu prywatyzacji w Etiopii. Wyniki: Rząd objął procesem prywatyzacji duże przedsiębiorstwa publiczne, jednak warunki i czas prywatyzacji nadal budzą kontrowersje wśród naukowców. Skuteczny proces prywatyzacji wymagał rozwoju instytucjonalnego, a obietnice rządu zostały wystawione na próbę. Na wyniki przedsiębiorstw znaczący wpływ miały ramy prawne i polityczne. Zaobserwowano, że ramy prawne i konsekwentnie niestabilny charakter historii prywatyzacji w Etiopii. Zaobserwowano, że ramy prawne i konsekwentnie niestabilny charakter historii prywatyzacji w Etiopii. Wnioski praktyczne: Niniejsze badanie ma praktyczny wkład i wkład, dając wgląd badaczom, praktykom i decydentom politycznym w celu zapewnienia alternatywnych sposobów prywatyzacji, odpowiednich dla kontekstu etiopskiego. Wnioski i podsumowanie: Tryb prywatyzacji musi zostać wstępnie przeanalizowany i starannie wybrany, biorąc pod uwagę ważne czynniki sukcesu, w tym interes publiczny, cele przedsięwzięcia i trwałość firm. Techniki muszą uwzględniać charakter i cechy badanych firm, przejrzystość i dobrze przygotowane opcje prywatyzacji.
EN
Background and objectives: Since 1991, several state-owned enterprises in distinct categories were transferred to the private sector under the privatisation policy in Ethiopia. The process and its modalities vary. The notion behind the implementation was to transfer those inefficient public-owned firms to the private sector with an expectation of improving defects. But, privatisation processes are neither a one-time incidence nor an immediate action. Privatisation processes are inter-linked with various macro and microeconomic and sometimes socio-political policies, and reforms. In this paper, privatisation modalities, inconsistencies, and arguments regarding the Ethiopian privatisation process are analysed. Study Design / Material and Methods: Using a systematic literature review process, 50 papers were found and extracted in a methodical manner from PubMed, Ecobiz, and Google Scholar Databases. The analysis was undertaken following systematic categories after taking heterogeneity articles on Ethiopia's privatisation process into consideration. Results: The government encompasses large public-owned enterprises in the privatisation process; however, the privatisation modalities and timing are still a point of controversy among scholars. The effective privatisation process required institutional development, and the government’s promises were put to the test. The performance of enterprises was significantly impacted by legal and policy frameworks. The legal framework and consistently unstable nature of Ethiopia’s privatisation history have been observed. It has been observed that the legal framework and consistently unstable nature of Ethiopia’s privatisation history. Practical implications: This study has a practical contribution and input by giving insights for researchers, practitioners and policy makers for providing alternative privatisation modalities, appropriate for the Ethiopian context. Conclusion and Summary: The mode of privatisation must be pre-examined and carefully selected by considering important success factors including public interest, objectives of endeavour, and the sustainability of firms. The techniques must consider the nature and characteristics of the firms studied, clarity and well-prepared privatisation options.

Year

Volume

2

Issue

37

Pages

5-27

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

  • Arba Minch University, College of Business and Economics, Department of Management Arba Minch, Ethiopia
  • International Maritime College Oman, Department of Logistics Management, Sohar
  • Arba Minch University, College of Business and Economics, Department of Management Arba Minch, Ethiopia

References

  • Abdeldayem, M.M., & Aldulaimi, S.H. (2020). Lessons drawn from privatisation in developing countries: Evidence from an emerging economy. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(3), 6159-6171.
  • Abebe, Y.G. (2018). Yeabneh gedamu abebe january, 2018 addis ababa ethiopia.
  • Adane, Y.G., Engida, T.G., Asfaw, Y.A., Azadi, H., & Passel, S. Van. (2018). Determinants of internal governance quality: Evidence from corporations in Ethiopia. Cogent Economics and Finance, 6(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1537051.
  • Addis, S., Dvivedi, A., & Beshah, B. (2019). Quality management as a tool for job satisfaction improvement in low-level technology organizations: the case of Ethiopia. Production Planning and Control, 30(8), 665-681. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1574510.
  • Adeyemo, D.O., & Salami, A.O. (2008). A Review of Privatisation and Public Enterprises Reform in Nigeria. Contemporary Management Research, 4(4), 401-418. https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.607.
  • Barrios Sánchez, J.M., Baeza Serrato, R., & Bianchetti, M. (2022). Design and Development of a Mathematical Model for an Industrial Process, in a System Dynamics Environment. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199855.
  • Belke, A., Baumgärtner, F., Schneider, F., & Setzer, R. (2007). The Different Extent of Privatisation Proceeds in OECD Countries: A Preliminary Explanation Using a Public-Choice Approach Author (s): Ansgar Belke, Frank Baumgärtner, Friedrich Schneider and Ralph Setzer Source : FinanzArchiv / Public Finance Analys, 63(2), 211-243. https://doi.org/10.1628/001522107X220080.
  • Chare, A.D. (2020). Factors Affecting Private Investment in Ethiopian Industry Sector: The Case of Sugar Factories, 8(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.m2economics.20200801.03.
  • Chole, E. (2018). Privatisation and Deregulation in Ethiopian Industry. Journal of Ethiopian Studies, 26(1), 33-58.
  • Desta, A. (2019). Transforming Ethiopia' S Developmental State. Review of Socio-Economic Perspectives, 4(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.19275/RSEP062.
  • Emagne, Y. (2017). Exploring the Relationship between Trade Liberalization and Ethiopian Economic Growth. Ethiopian Journal of Economics, 26(2), 109-141. https://doi.org/10.4314/EJE.V26I2.
  • Estrin, S., Liang, Z., Shapiro, D., & Carney, M. (2019). State Capitalism, Economic Systems and the Performance of State Owned Firms, 69 (s1), 175-193. https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2019.69.S1.11.
  • Fink, S. (2011). A Contagious Concept: Explaining the Spread of Privatisation in the Telecommunications Sector 24(1), 111-139.
  • Gebeyehu, W. (2011). Causal Links among Saving, Investment and Growth and Determinants of Saving in Sub‐Saharan Africa: Evidence, from Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Economics, 19(2), 1-34.
  • Göte, H. (2004). Ethiopia: Economic Performance and the Role of the Private Sector, SIDA.
  • Haleem, F., Jehangir, M., & Baig, A. (2017). Operations Strategy Practices of SMEs. Global Economics Review, II(I), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.31703/ger.2017(ii-i).02.
  • Kayizzi-Mugerwa, S. (2002). Privatisation in sub-Saharan Africa On Factors Affecting Implementation. Discussion Paper No. 2002/12.
  • Kedir, A.M., & Bedasso, B. (2020). Privatisation for sustainable growth in Ethiopia A review review. International Growth Centre.
  • Krammer, S.M.S. (2018). A double-edged sword? The antipodal effects of institutional distance on partner selection in cross-border alliances. Journal of World Business, 53(6), 930-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.08.001.
  • Leykun, F. (2020a). Privatisation Modalities and Business Valuation: An Ethiopian Focus. Journal of Investment and Management, 9(1), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20200901.13.
  • Leykun, F. (2020b). Theoretical Arguments and Debates on Public Enterprises Privatisation: Ethiopian Focus. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 11(11), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.7176/jesd/11-11-06.
  • Lloyd, J., & Teshome, B. (2018). Foreign Exchange Allocation and Access for Businesses in Ethiopia. October, 1-39. https://www.gov.uk/dfid-research-outputs/%0Ahttps://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5c90aa9240f0b633fc95f6d4/BERF_Ethiopia_ Foreign_Exchange_for_Businesses_.pdf.
  • Megginson, W.L., Nash, R.C., Netter, J.M., Adam, L., Megginson, W.L., Nash, R.C., Netter, J. M., & Schwartz, A.L. (2000). The Long-Run Return to Investors in Share Issue Privatisation. 29(1), 67-77.
  • Megginson, W.L., & Netter, J.M. (2001). From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatisation. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), 321-389. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.39.2.321.
  • Mengistu, B., & Vogel, E. (2009). Public Perceptions of Privatisation in Ethiopia: A Case for Public Good or Private Gain? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(8), 681-703. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902999884.
  • Mesfin, D. & Abera A.K. (2016). Public-Private-Partnership in Ethiopia: The BOT Modality in Utility Billing. European Journal of Business and Management, 8(31), 54-60.
  • McCulloch, L. (2001). TRADE LIBERALIZATION AND POVERTY: Centre for Economic Policy Research. Centre for Economic Policy Research 90-98 Goswell Road London EC1V 7RR UK.
  • Nellis, J. (2012). The International Experience with Privatisation: its Rapid Rise, Partial Fall and Uncertain Future. SPP Research Papers, 12-3.
  • Nolan, P., & Zhang, J. (2003). Globalization challenge for large firms from developing countries: China's oil and aerospace industries. European Management Journal, 21(3), 285-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(03)00047-1.
  • Obinger, H., Schmitt, C., & Starke, P. (2013). Policy Diffusion and Policy Transfer in Comparative Welfare State Research. Social Policy & Administration, 47(1), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12003.
  • Och, V. I. D. B.-, Bibliotekshögskolan, I., Hansson, J., Hansson, J., & Heedman, J. (2004). Privatisering av folkbibliotek - skildrat i politiska dokument under 1990-talet.
  • Schuster, P.B. (2013). One for all and all for one : privatisation and Universal Service provision in the postal sector One for all and all for one : privatisation and Universal Service provision in the postal sector. Applied Economics, 45(26), 3667-3682. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2012.727982.
  • Selvam, J., Meenakshisundararajan, A., Iyappan, T. (2005). Privatisation and Capital Accumulation: Empirical Evidences from Ethiopia. African Journal of Economic Policy 12(I), 61-88.
  • Sheshinski, E., & López-Calva, L.F. (2003). Privatisation and Its Benefits: Theory and Evidence. CESifo Economic Studies, 49(3), 429-459.
  • Sundara Rajan, A.M., Iyappan, T., & Selvam, J. (2005). Impact of economic reforms on economics issues: A study of Ethiopia. African Development Review, 17(1), 138-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1017-6772.2005.00109.x.
  • Tenaw, A. (2011). The Performance of Privatized Public Enterprises in Ethiopia: the Case of Hotel Enterprises. Addis Ababa University School of Graduate Studies,
  • The World Bank. (2019). The Inescapable Manufacturing- Services Nexus: Exploring the potential. 19-38. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/811791526447120021/pdf/126255-WP-PUBLIC-DIGITAL-Ethiopia-Economic-Update-The-Inescapable-Manufacturing-Services-Nexus.pdf.
  • Thew, R., Calarco, T., Roorda, P. D., Ca, O., Jones, K. P., Ca, K., Friesen, P., Ca, O., Patent, U. S., Ci, U. S., ITU, Systems, D., ITU-T, 129/Menkes/SK/II/2008, M. K. R. I. N. :, מזלי, ר., Roberts, A., Mujtaba, A., Mujtaba, A., Mujtaba, A., … Seifert, F. (2015). No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における 健康関連指標に関する共分散構 造分析. Metrologia, 53(5), 1-116.
  • Tsegaw, E. (2016). The Legal Status of State-Owned Share Companies in Ethiopia. Beijing Law Review, 07(01), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2016.71002.
  • UNCTAD. (2018). A Review of Competition Policy in Ethiopia. United Nation.
  • Venkita Subramanian, K., & Thill, J.-C. (2019). Effect of privatisation and inland infrastructural development on India's container port selection dynamics. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 35(4), 220-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.12.009.
  • W/yohannes, A. (2015). 2015 Addis Ababa. October.
  • Wacziarg, R., & Welch, K.H. (2008). Trade liberalization and growth: New evidence. World Bank Economic Review, 22(2), 187-231. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhn007.
  • Wodajo, T., & Senbet, D. (2017). Does Privatisation Improve Productivity? Empirical Evidence from Ethiopia. International Journal of African Development, 4(2), 5-26.
  • Woldesenbet, W.G. (2020). The tragedies of a state dominated political economy: shared vices among the imperial, Derg, and EPRDF regimes of Ethiopia. Development Studies Research, 7(1), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2020.1785903.
  • Yongo-Bure, B. (2020). The Ethiopian economy. In: Regional Development Poles and the Transformation of African Economies, November, Rotledge, 88-117. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003024804-5.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
58061457

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_19253_reme_2023_02_001
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.