Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | 14 | 1 | 76-84

Article title

Teachers in the Private and Public Spheres: Ethical Orientations in Educational Interactions

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
Aim. The main aim of the article is a presentation of a comparative study of differences in ethical orientations used by teachers in educational practice in two settings: in private life as parents and in the public sphere, working as teachers. Methods. First, a hypothesis was proposed to test the observations by Lawrence Kohlberg (1984) and Carol Gilligan (1993) regarding the relative stability of ethical orientations in terms of the ethics of care and justice. To this end, an assumption was made that teachers prefer the former in contacts with their own children (private sphere) while favouring the latter in relationships with students (public sphere). The paired samples t-test confirmed this hypothesis. Results. Based on the analysis, gender was found not to influence teachers’ ethical orientations in the private sphere; however, it seems to play a part in the public sphere. This ambivalence was revealed in male teachers. Contrary to gender stereotype, in contacts with their own children, they tend to lean towards the ”feminine” ethics of care, but when acting in their public capacity they perpetuate the ‘masculine’ stereotype by following the ethics of justice in their school interactions. Conclusion. It is worth emphasising the ambiguity of the results obtained and the instability of their interpretations. The actions of the teachers studied do not confirm the thesis about the stability of ethical orientations in educational work and are, therefore, indicative of ambivalence towards the role of gender in this process.

Year

Volume

14

Issue

1

Pages

76-84

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

  • Department of Education, Faculty of Arts, University of ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, Nám. J. Herdu 2, 917 01 Trnava, Slovak Republic
  • Department of Education, Faculty of Arts, University of ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, Nám. J. Herdu 2, 917 01 Trnava, Slovak Republic
  • Department of Education, Faculty of Arts, University of ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, Nám. J. Herdu 2, 917 01 Trnava, Slovak Republic
  • Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Medical University of Lublin, Al. Racławickie 1, 20-059 Lublin, Poland

References

  • Buss, D. M. (2005). The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Wiley.
  • Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676
  • Chomczyńska-Rubacha, M., & Rubacha, K. (2015). Ethical orientations of young women in Poland and Serbia: Comparative studies. Rocznik Andragogiczny, 22(0), 267–276.
  • Dweck, C. (2017). The journey to children’s mindsets and beyond. Child Development Perspectives, 11, 139–144. https://doi.org/10.12775/RA.2015.015
  • Else-Quest, N. M., Higgins, A., Allison, C., & Morton L. C. (2012). Gender differences in self-conscious emotional experience: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 947– 981. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027930
  • Gilligan, C. (1993). Reply to critics. In M. J. Larrabee (Ed.), An ethic of care. Feminist interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 324-333). Routledge.
  • Gilligan, C. (2003). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays of moral development. Volume II. The psychology of moral development. Harper & Row.
  • Kroger, J, Martinussen M., & Marcia, J. E. (2010). Identity status change during adolescence and young adulthood: A meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 33(5), 683–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.11.002
  • Thoma, S. (1994). Moral judgments and moral action. In J. R. Narváez D. (Ed)., Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. (pp. 199-211). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
18653971

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_15503_jecs2023_1_76_84
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.