Nomadic Models of Postmodern Aesthetics: Soteriological Choice of the Teacher

• Authors: Ludmyla Kondratska , Liudmila Romanovska , Tetiana Kravchyna , Svitlana Kozachenko , Mykola Novak

Abstracts

EN

Aim. The aim of the article is to define the concept of aesthetic competence of the nomad teacher of postmodern era based on a comparative analysis of two aesthetic models (metis paraesthetics and soteriological aesthetics). Methods. The subject of study is anthropotemporal methodology of acquiring aesthetic competence as an act of spiritual transformation (approaches, paradigm, priorities, criteria of effectiveness). The analysis of the stages of nomad’s dianoic choice in the process of understanding beauty as a boon was carried out using the method of epistemological design, according to which emotions function cognitively in aesthetic experience. The technology of spiritual self-coaching was chosen to activate all the structural components of aesthetic competence – the intention to correct aesthetic apperception and the competencies of emotional-reflective, value-semantic, aesthetic and worldview revaluation. Results. The implementation of the chosen technology opened up the possibility of reorientation for the nomad teacher: from the drive of the performer-trickster to a humble and grateful anticipation of the beauty as transcendent – to overcoming the power of inertia of previous dependence, responses to the calls of a pure (still “adventurous”) mind. A cluster analysis of the results of the completed tasks was carried out for the regression description of the efficiency of the technology. Conclusion. The soteriological concept of the aesthetic competence of the nomad teacher focuses attention on the essential coexistence of the teacher with students throughout the entire process of his self-determination. The practical experience of its implementation can make a positive contribution to reforming postmodern aesthetic education.

Keywords

EN

mestizo paraaesthetics; beauty as a good; metanoia; nomadism as a pilgrimage; aesthetic competence

• Publisher: Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
• Journal: Journal of Education Culture and Society
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 435-450

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Ludmyla Kondratska

• Department of Musicology and Methodology of Musical Art, Faculty of Arts, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, ul. Maxym Kryvonos 2, 46024 Ternopil, Ukraine

author

Liudmila Romanovska

• Social work and Pedagogics Department, Humanities Faculty, Khmelnytsky National University, ul. Institutska 11, 29006 Khmelnytsky, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000000175474575

author

Tetiana Kravchyna

• Department of Foreign languages, Faculty of International Relations and Law, Khmelnytsky National University, ul. Institutska 11, 29006 Khmelnytsky, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000000184076667

author

Svitlana Kozachenko

• Department of International Communication and Political Science, Faculty of International Relations and Law, Khmelnytsky National University, ul. Institutska11, 29006 Khmelnytsky, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/000000031459202X

author

Mykola Novak

• Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, Faculty of Health, Psychology, Physical Culture and Sports, Khmelnytsky National University, ul. Institutska11, 29006 Khmelnytsky, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000000302216342

References

• Agamben, G. (2013). Leviathans Rätsel. Mohr Siebeck.
• Ahlquist, D. (2012). The Complete Thinker: The Marvelous Mind of G.K. Chesterton. Ignatius Press.
• Alter, R. (2018). The Hebrew Bible. New York, NY: WW Norton.
• Alvarez Puerta, M. C. (2014). Nelson Goodman irrealism and evanescent ontology. Episteme, 34(1), 1-18.
• Andrews, B., Watson, P. J., Chen, Z. J., & Morris, R. J. (2017). Postmodernism, posіtive psychology and post-traumatic growth within a Christian ideological surround. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(5), 489-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1228004
• Barthes, R. (2013). How to Live Together: Notes for a Lecture Course and Seminar at the Collège de France (1976–1977). Columbia University Press.
• Baudrillard, J. (2000). Le système des objets. Gallimard.
• Baudrillard, J. (2008). Simulacra and Simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Baumeister, R.F. (2019). Stalking the True Self Through the Jungles of Authenticity: Problems, Contradictions, Inconsistencies, Disturbing Findings-and a Possible Way Forward. Review of General Psychology, 23(1), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268019829472
• Bloom, H. (2014). The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages. Riverhead Books.
• Bourriaud, N. (2009). Altermodern Tate Triennial. Tate Publishing.
• Braidotti, R. (2017). Posthuman Knowledge. Polity Press.
• Bryant, R., & Knight, D.M. (2019). The аnthropology of the future. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108378277
• Caputo, J. D. (2015). Hoping Against Hope: Confessions of a Postmodern Pilgrim. Fortress Press.
• Deleuze, G. & Krauss, R. (1983). Plato and the Simulacrum. October, 27, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/778495
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2009). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Penguin Classics.
• Derrida, J. (2011) Psychée: Invention de I’autre. Galilée.
• Eco, U. (2002) Art and Beauty in the Middle Ages. Yale University Press.
• Eco, U. (2004). The Name of the Rose. Vintage Classics.
• Eshelman, R. (2000) Performatism, or the End of Postmodernism. Anthropoetics: The electronic Journal of Generative Anthropology, 6(2), 1–17.
• Foucault, M. (2001). The Order of Things: An archaeology of the human sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315660301
• Foucault, М. (2006). History of Madness. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i5.1411
• Gábor, B. (2014). Medieval Aesthetics. Encyclopedia of Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
• Gaut, B. (2007) Art, Emotions and Ethics. Oxford University Press.
• Genosko, G. (2020). Rhizome. Pluto Press.
• Gibson, J. (2008). Cognitivism and the Arts. Philosophy Compass, 3, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00144.x
• Gilbert, A. (2013). The culture crunch: Daniel Bell’s The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. Thesis Eleven, 118(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513613500383
• Gorman, C. (2015). The Undecidable: Jacques Derrida and Paul Howard. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Gorner, P. (2007). Heidegger’s Being and Time: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
• Graham, G. (2005) Philosophy of the Arts: An Introduction to Aesthetics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203696224
• Gray, J. (2007). Enlightenment’s Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age. Routledge.
• Hammer, M., & Hammer, B. (2015). The Illusion of the “Healthy Personality” and the Reality of Transpersonal Being. Psychol Clin Psychiatry, 3(6), 11-12. https://doi.org/10.15406/jpcpy.2015.03.00171
• Harrington, T. (2009). The Speaking Abject in Kristeva’s Powers of Horror. Hypatia, 13, 138-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01355.x
• Hermerén, G. (1993). Scandinavian Aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 51(2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.2307/431383
• Herrero, M. (2005). Encounters with Postmodern Art: Zygmunt Bauman, Sociology and Art. Irish Journal of Sociology, 14(1), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/079160350501400108
• Hertler, S. C., Krauss, H. H., & Ward, A. W. (2017). The postmodern self: Personal persistence and its absence in contemporary life narratives. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 57(2), 127-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167815586666
• Husserl, E. (2017). Introduction to Transcendental Phenomenology. Atcost Press.
• Hutcheon, L. (1992). Eco’s Echoes: Ironizing the (Post) Modern. Diacritics, 22(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/465234
• Jameson, F. (2009). Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Duke University Press.
• Karam, A. M. (2019). Essential characteristics of the phenomenon “aesthetic competence of the individual”. Pedagogical education: Theory and practice. Psychology, Pedagogy, 32, 81-86 https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-2409.2019.32.11
• Kieran, M. (2011) Aesthetic Knowledge. In S. Bernecker, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology (pp. 369-379). Routledge.
• Kirby, A. (2009). Digimodernism: How New Technologies Dismantle the Postmodern and Reconfigure Our Culture. Continuum.
• Klossowski, P. (2009). Circulus Vitiosus. The Agonist, 2(1), 33-34.
• Kozlowski, P. (2012). The concept of God, the origin of the world, and the image of the human in the world religions. Springer Netherlands Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0999-7
• Kravchyna, T., Kondratska, L., Romanovska, L., Korolova, N., & Gudz, T. (2022). Realization of Future Teacher’s Mental Space in the Process of Bite-Sized Learning. Postmodern Openings, 13(2), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.2/445
• Kruger, D. J. (2002). The deconstruction of constructivism. American Psychologist, 57(6-7), 456–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.6-7.456
• Lacan, J. (2005). L’insu que sait de l’une-bévue s’aile à mourre (1976-1977). A.L.I.
• Lazaro, J. & Sganzerla, A. (2019). Emmanuel Mounier’s Personalism, human dignity and the crisis of values in Mozambican society. Revista Electrónica de Investigação e Desenvolvimento, 2(10), 1-9.
• Lehrer, K. (2012) Art, Self and Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
• Lentricchia, F. (2012). After the New Criticism. Bordighera Press.
• Lobo, A. (2013). Seduction as a Game of Reversals and Death. Understanding Jean Baudrillard’s Seduction through Patricia Duncker’s Hallucinating Foucault. Letras, 53, 157-180. https://doi.org/10.15359/rl.1-53.7
• Lyotard, J. F. (2018). La Condition postmoderne. Rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Les Éditions.
• Manske, Ch. (2018). Alle Kinder lernen gemeinsam lessen: Spielen - Schreiben - Lesen. Lehmanns Media Verlag.
• Mayrhofer, R., Kuhbandner, Ch. & Lindner, C. (2021). The Practice of Experimental Psychology: An Inevitably Postmodern Endeavor. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 612805. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612805
• Movchan, V.S. (2015). Aesthetics: a study guide for universities. Kyiv: Znannia.
• Nanay, B. (2014). Philosophy of Perception as a Guide to Aesthetics. In G. Currie, M. Kieran, A. Meskin, J. Robson (Eds.), Aesthetics and the Sciences of the Mind. Oxford University Press.
• Nancy, J. L. (2011) God, Justice, Love, Beauty: Four Little Dialogues. Fordham University Press.
• Pinker, S. (2019). Why We Are Not Living in a Post-Truth Era: An (Unnecessary) Defense of Reason and a (Necessary) Defense of Universities’ Role in Advancing it. Skeptic, 24(3). https://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/steven-pinker-on-why-we-are-not-living-in-a-post-truth-era/
• Potapchuk, T. V. (2019). Formuvannia estetychnoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh uchyteliv obrazotvorchoho mystetstva [Formation of aesthetic competence of future teachers of fine arts], Dukhovnist osobystosti: metodolohiia, teoriia i praktyka, 6(93), 202-209.
• Renaut, A. (2014). The Age of the Individual. Toward a History of Subjectivity. Princeton University Press.
• Revenko, I. V. (2014). Artistic and aesthetic competence of a teacher as an indicator of his professional culture. Art and education, 3, 139-146.
• Rorty, R. (1998). Contingence, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Rozhnova, V. M. (2019). Sutnist ta struktura estetychnoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh vykhovateliv zakladiv doshkilnoi osvity [The essence and structure of aesthetic competence of future teachers of preschool education institutions], Visnyk Hlukhivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Oleksandra Dovzhenka, Pedahohichni nauky, 40, 71-78.
• Samuels, R. (2010). Auto-Modernity after Postmodernism: Autonomy and Automation in Culture, Technology, and Education. In T. McPherson (Ed.), Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected (pp.219-240). The MIT Press.
• Shadurska, O. (2019). Vykorystannia web-saitu dlia formuvannia estetychnoi kompetentnosti starshoklasnykiv na urokakh tekhnolohii [The use of the website for the formation of aesthetic competence of high school students in technology lessons], Naukovi zapysky molodykh uchenykh, 4, 1-6.
• Tarescavage, A. M. (2020). Science Wars II: The insidious influence of postmodern ideology on clinical psychology (Commentary on “Implications of ideological bias in social psychology on clinical practice”). Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 27(2), e12319. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12319
• Todorov, T. (2009) La Signature humaine. Essais 1983-2008. Seuil.
• Tricarico, G. (2016). The individuation process in post-modernity. Psychological Perspectives, 59(4), 461-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332925.2016.1240529
• Vider, J. (2022). Translating the Field. Vis Anthropol Rev, 38, 8-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/var.12258

Identifiers

DOI

10.15503/jecs2023.1.435.450

Biblioteka Nauki

18661279