Cognitive Development by Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)

• Authors: Lalit Gehlot

Abstracts

EN

Aim/Thesis: The aim of this research is to promote the use of the three concepts-- the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), the Gettier Problem, and Corpus Linguistics (Contextual Learning)--to increase the academic performance of early undergraduate engineering students. Concept/Methods: 30 Engineering students completed one untimed Mensa IQ Test of 10 questions and one Simon-Binet IQ Test of 50 random IQ questions with a 12 minute time limit. These 30 students were chosen from two different college sections:  15 students from each section. Before the second Simon-Binet Test, one group, G(a), was given ZPD scaffolding in three major topics - Working Memory, Fluid Reasoning and Spatial Reasoning -as they had answered questions based on these concepts incorrectly in their first Mensa IQ test. The second group, G(b), was not given  the ZPD scaffolding. A statistical t-test that was later performed indicated that G(a), with scaffolding, outperformed G(b), without the scaffolding, in the second IQ test.  Results and conclusion: Using the t-test, it is seen that the hypothesis of this research that ZPD, Gettier Problem and Corpus Linguistics can enhance the performance of the students in a short time period is correct. After the first Mensa IQ test, the level of both the groups G(a) and G(b) of engineering students was  almost the same, indicated by a very similar mean results.  However, after supporting G(a) utilizing ZPD, Gettier Problem and Corpus Linguistics for their three problem areas - Working Memory, Fluid Reasoning and Spatial Reasoning  - identified after their first IQ test where the students needed scaffolding, the performance of this group  improved more in comparison to G(b),  as indicated by the results of the second online Simon-Binet Test.        Research restrictions: It was not possible to provide all the random questions of the online Simon-Binet test given to all 30 students because the total number of questions would be 30*50=1500. Only the first ten questions of the Mensa IQ test are included in this research paper. Further, the third and fourth year engineering students are not included in this research as it is assumed that they have had already developed expertise and the effect of the investigated tools would not be clearly visible.  Practical application: ZPD scaffolding was applied to the students when the students’ major problem areas were identified as requiring contextual learning and support. The Gettier Problem-- an epistemological concept-- was also used to keep their mind open at all the times during the learning process and Linguistics Corpus gave the contextual support as ZPD proposes the social-contextual mode of learning. Originality/Cognitive value: The paper presents empirical research on engineering students demonstrating the practical utility of ZPD, Gettier Problem and Corpus Linguistics in the process of learning, potentially irrespective of any discipline.

Keywords

EN

Zone of Proximal Development; Gettier Problem; Corpus Linguistics; interdisciplinary approach; epistemology

• Publisher: Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
• Journal: Journal of Education Culture and Society
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 12
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 432-444

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Lalit Gehlot

• Department of English, Swami Keshvanand Institute of Technology Management and Gramothan,

• https://orcid.org/0000000290772113

References

• Aggarwal, S. (2016). The Zone of Proximal Development: A tool of teaching. Bhartiyam International Journal of Education & Research, 5(II), 47–54.
• Akbar, N. (2021). Application of the mechanisms of Zone of Proximal Development
• (ZPD) for achieving learner centeredness in large-sized classrooms: Prospects and challenges for Indian language classrooms. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Translation Studies, 8(1), 130-134.
• Baker, R., Ma, W., Zhao, Y., Wang, S., & Ma, Z. (2020). The results of implementing
• Zone of Proximal Development on learning outcomes. In A. N. Rafferty, J.
• Whitehill, C. Romero & V. Cavalli-Sforza (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th
• International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2020), International
• Educational Data Mining Society, (pp. 749-753). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED607784.pdf.
• Breive, S. (2020). Student-teacher dialectic in the co-creation of a zone of proximal development: an example from kindergarten mathematics. European Early Childhood
• Education Research Journal, 28(3), 413–423.
• Cheyne, J. A., & Tarulli, D. (1999). Dialogue, difference, and voice in the Zone of
• Proximal Development. Theory & Psychology, 9(1), 5–28.
• Cooper, J., & Lavie, I. (2021). Bridging incommensurable discourses – A commognitive look at instructional design in the zone of proximal development. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 61(100822), 1-9.
• Eun, B. (2017). The zone of proximal development as an overarching concept: A framework for synthesizing Vygotsky’s theories. Educational Philosophy and Theory, (1), 18–30.
• Groot, F., Jonker, G., Rinia, M., ten Cate, O., & Hoff, R. G. (2019). Simulation at the
• Frontier of the Zone of Proximal Development: A Test in acute care for inexperienced learners. Academic Medicine, 95(7), 1098–1105.
• Hayward, P. A. (1995, April 19-23). The use of Vygotsky’s theory of the Zone of Proximal
• Development in quantitative research: A critical review. In Annual Meeting of the Central States Communication Association (pp. 1-28). ERIC Document Reproduction
• Service (EDRS). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED398609.pdf.
• Hazlett, A. (2015). The maturation of the Gettier problem. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 172(1), 1-6.
• Kobylarek, A. (2019). Power as knowledge. The reverse logic of the post-scientific world. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 11(2), 5–14.
• Kusmaryono, I., Jupriyanto, & Kusumaningsih, W. (2021). Construction of students’ mathematical knowledge in the Zone of Proximal Development and Zone of Potential Construction., 10(1), 341–351.
• Lantolf, J. P., & Aljaafreh, A. (1995). Second language learning in the zone of proximal development: A revolutionary experience. International Journal of Educational Research, 23(7), 619–632.
• Meijer, J., & Elshout, J. J. (2001). The predictive and discriminant validity of the zone of proximal development. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 93–113.
• Ofori-Attah, K. (2021). Early childhood education and instructional ecology: A Vygotskian approach in teaching early childhood social studies. Athens Journal of Education, 8(2), –160.
• Pardo, M. S. (2010). The Gettier problem and legal proof. Legal Theory, 16(1), 37–57.
• Podolskiy, A. I. (2012). Zone of Proximal Development. In N. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 3485–3487). DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6.
• Shvarts, A., & Bakker, A. (2019). The early history of the scaffolding metaphor: Bernstein, Luria, Vygotsky, and before. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(1), pp. 4–23.
• Lavin, S. (2019, Dec. 3-5). Towards a useful conception of the ZPD for language education. In 2nd International Conference of Advance Teaching and Education, (pp.57-66). Austria, Vienna.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15503/jecs2021.2.432.444

Biblioteka Nauki

1878490