Modern Migration Crisis in Europe and the Role of Diasporas in Combating the Mutual Hostility between Newcomers and Host Society

• Authors: Emilia Alaverdov
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Aim. The goal of the paper is to analyse the constantly growing scale of migration and its impact on the European political and social sphere; to show the concern of European politicians and society about the newcomers, which leads to social hostility and unpredictable situations. There is a concern that migrants, being representatives of different cultural environments and religions, will bring social disharmony, raise the crime rate and terrorism in Europe and cause a certain threats to European society. Methods. The basis of the paper are the following research methods – statistical, descriptive and analytical, which represent certain sources: the study courses and books, scientific papers, empirical materials, published on official websites and documents in the field of migration and its policy. Results and conclusion. Modern migration is complicated by the strong emotional reaction and hostile attitude of European society, which has a direct negative impact on the European political situation and society itself. The situation has become even more complex by the fact that the migrants are mostly from Islamic countries with strong religious ideology and cultural roots that create serious obstacles for their integration. Here it is worthy of highlighting the role of Diasporas and their impact on the integrational processes. Cognitive value. It appears that the 21st century has become the era of migration. Thus, the representatives of all social sciences are paying attention to the study of this unusually complex phenomenon. Yet, despite the significant interest of researchers, for politicians, and the civic sector the phenomena of migration still is not studied properly.

Keywords

EN

Key Words: Hostility, Newcomers, Society, Migration Crisis, Europe, Islam

• Publisher: Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
• Journal: Journal of Education Culture and Society
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 12
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 177-186

Dates

published

2021-06-17

Contributors

author

Emilia Alaverdov

• Georgian Technical University 0171, Kostava str. 77, Tbilisi, Georgia

References

• Alaverdov, E. (2020). Anti-Islamic Discourse in Modern Europe. In: J. Dobreva, E. Alaverdov, E. Yıldırım-Şahin (Eds.). Geopolitics, Discrimination, Gender & Immigration. (pp. 35-53).
• London: IJOPEC Publication.
• Berry, J. (1992). Acculturation and Adaptation in a New Society. Special Issue Migration and Health in the 90s. Quarterly Review, 30, 3-8.
• Brettell, C., & Hallifield, J. (2007). Migration Theory. In: Zn. Zayonchkovskaya, I. Molodikova, V. Mukomel (Eds.). Methodology and Study Methods Migration Processes (pp. 33-71). Moscow: Center for Migration Studies.
• Bichara, Kh. (2015). Muslims in Europe: The Construction of a “Problem.” In: The Search for Europe. Constructing Approaches. Madrid: BBVA.
• Council of the European Union (2004). Press Release 2618th Council Meeting Justice and Home Affairs Brussels.
• Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. (1951). Geneva. The Convention was adopted by the United Nations Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Status of Refugees and Stateless Persons, held at Geneva from 2 to 25 July 1951. The Conference was convened according to resolution 429 (V) 1, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 14 December 1950.
• European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, (2020). Fundamental Rights Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved December 22, 2020, from https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2020-fundamental-rights-report-
• _en.pdf
• European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, (2017). Fundamental Rights Reports. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved December 22, 2020, from https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2017-fundamental-rights-report-
• _en.pdf
• European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2018). Fundamental Rights Reports. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved December 22, 2020, from https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2018-fundamental-rights-report-
• _en.pdf
• European Union. (2012). Global Europe 2025. Luxembourg: Fundamental Rights Report.
• Retrieved December 19, 2020, from https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/annual-report2012_en.pdf
• Gradirovski, S., & Mezhuyev, B. (2004). Western Population Drift of Local and Global Scale. Moscow: Development of statehood in a situation of demographic transformation of the world.
• Gedmin, J. (2019). Right-wing populism in Germany: Muslims and Minorities after the 2015 Refugee Crisis. Report. Brookings. Retrieved December 25, 2020, from
• https://www.brookings.edu/research/right-wing-populism-in-germany-muslims-and-minoritiesafter-the-2015-refugee-crisis/
• Hellyer, H. A. (2009). Present and Current Situation. In: H. A. Hellyer (Ed.), Muslims in Europe:
• The ‘Other Europeans’ (pp.77-78). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Malashenko, A. (2019). Islam: XXI Century. Moscow: Institute of the Middle East.
• Molodikova, I. (2007). Western Approaches to the Study of Migration – Possibilities of Comparisons with the Russian Research School. In: Zh. Zayonchkovskaya, I. Molodikova, V. Mukomel (Eds.) Methodology and Study Methods Migration Processes (pp. 9-31). Moscow:
• Center for Migration Studies.
• Mukhetdinov, D., & Boroday S. (2016). Islam in Europe. Textbook. Moscow: Publishing House Medina.
• Panina, S. Kosmarski, N., Byatkina, A. (1999). In a Voluntary and Forced Movement. PostSoviet migrations in Eurasia. Moscow: Natali Press.
• Pew Research Center (2011). The Future of the Global Muslim Population. Retrieved December 25, 2020, from https://www.pewforum.org/2011/01/27/the-future-of-the-global-muslimpopulation/
• Rostan, P., & Rostan, A. (2019). When will the European Muslim population be a majority and in which country? PSU Research Review, 3(2), 123-144. doi:10.1108/PRR-12-2018-0034.
• Radeljić, B. (2014). Muslim Diaspora and European Identity: The Politics of Exclusion and Inclusion. In: S. Sahoo, B. Pattanaik (Eds), Global Diasporas and Development. New Delhi: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-81-322-1047-4_14.
• Selipsky R. (2019). Anti-refugee sentiment in Germany. Democratic Erosion. Retrieved December 25, 2020, from https://www.democratic-erosion.com/2019/04/21/democratic-erosionand-anti-refugee-sentiment-in-germany-by-ruth-selipsky/
• Sarrazin, T. (2012). Germany: Self -liquidation. Political Animal. M.: Reed Group.
• Schmid, C. (2016). Germany’s “Open-Door” Policy in Light of the Recent Refugee Crisis An
• Interpretive Thematic Content Analysis of Possible Reasons and Underlying Motivations,
• Linköping University. Retrieved November 19, 2020, from http://liu.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:1046928/FULLTEXT01.pdf
• United Nations (2019). Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). International Migration: Report (ST/ESA/SER.A/438).
• Van, N. (2003). Refugee Diasporas, Remittances, Development, and Conflict. Migration
• Information Source. Retrieved November 19, 2020, from https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/refugee-diasporas-remittances-development-and-conflict Vertovec, S. (2005). The Political Importance of Diasporas. Migration Information Source. Retrieved November 19, 2020, from https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/politicalimportance-diasporas
• Volosenkova, E., Kabachenko, P., & Tarasova, E. (2007). Migration policy. Migration
• Management Processes. In: Zh. Zayonchkovskaya, I. Molodikova, V. Mukomel, (Eds.), Methodology and Study Methods Migration Processes (pp. 9-31). Moscow: Center for Migration Studies.
• Weaver, M. (2017). Burqa bans, headscarves, and veils: a timeline of legislation in the west.”
• The Guardian. Retrieved December 5, 2020, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/14/headscarves-and-muslim-veil-ban-debatetimeline

Identifiers

DOI

10.15503/jecs2021.1.177.186