Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2011 | 9 | 2 | 77-92

Article title

Temporal Inferences in Conversation

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Within this article, I explore how coproductions (expansions made by a second speaker upon a previous utterance) and questions regarding prior utterances work to verbalize inferences regarding the temporal information in spoken German conversation. While questions regarding prior utterances and coproductions are traditionally understood to have different communicative functions (signaling understanding/ misunderstanding; turn taking) to coproductions, empirical data shows how these expression types enable the speaker to gradually verbalize different strengths of assumption about details of the previous turn. These two expression types are not a dichotomy, but a continuum.

Keywords

Year

Volume

9

Issue

2

Pages

77-92

Physical description

Dates

published
2011-12-01
online
2012-01-02

Contributors

  • Free University, Berlin, Germany

References

  • Auer, Peter (in press): "Projektionen und ihr Nutzen - oder: Warum die gesprochene Syntax oft minimalistisch ist.
  • Auer, Peter. 2002. "Projection in Interaction and Projecting in Grammar." LiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures 33, 1-38.
  • Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar. 2009. "Contrasting and turn transition: Prosodic projection with parallel-opposition constructions." Journal of Pragmatics 41: 2271-2294.[WoS]
  • Blakemore, Diane. 1994. Echo questions: A pragmatic account. Lingua 94: 197-211:
  • Bolden, Galina B. 2003: Multiple modalities in collaborative turn sequences. Gesture 3, (2): 187-212.
  • Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Dietrich, Rainer. 1999. "Vom Inhalt zur Form. Ein semantischer Versuch zur Analyse von Modalpartikeln. In: Ausdrucksgrammatik versus Inhaltsgrammatik, Renate Freudenberg-Findeisen (eds), 129-137. München, Iudicum.
  • Dittmar, Norbert; Terborg, Heiner. 1991. "Modality and second language learning: A challenge for linguistic theory." In: Cross Currents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, Charles A. Ferguson and Tom Hübner (eds), 347-381. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Fraser, Bruce. 1999. "What are discourse markers?" Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931-952.
  • Grice, H. Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Stokhof, Martin. 1997. "Questions." In: Handbook of logic and language. Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen (eds), 1055-1124. Amsterdam/ Lausanne/ New York u.a: Elsevier Science.
  • Hayashi, Makoto. 2004. "Projection and grammar: notes on the ‘action-projecting’ use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese." Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1337-1374.
  • Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2004. "Shared syntax: the grammar of co-constructions." Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1315-1336.
  • Horn, Laurence. 2007. "Neo-Gricean Pragmatics: a Manichaen Manifesto." In: Pragmatics. (Palgrave Advances in Linguistics.) Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), 158-183. London Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Klein, Wolfgang. 2009. "How time is encoded." In: The expression of time. W. Klein & P. Li (eds.), 39-82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.
  • Lerner, GeneH. 2004. "Collaborative turn sequences." In: Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Gene H. Lerner (ed.), 225-256. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Levinson, S.C. (2000) Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Linke, Angelika and Nussbaumer, Markus. 2000. "Konzepte des Impliziten: Präsuppositionen und Implikaturen." In: Text- und Gesprächslinguistik. (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (HSK) 16.1. Klaus Brinker (ed.), 435-448. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
  • Noh, Eun-Ju (1995): "Echo questions: Metapresenatition and Pragmatic Enrichment." Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 603-628.
  • Recanati, François. 2007. "It is Raining (Somewhere)." Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (1): 123-146.[WoS]
  • Recanati, François. 2004. Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Free Press.
  • Rost-Roth, Martina. 2006. Nachfragen: Formen und Funktionen äußerungsbezogener Interrogationen, Berlin: Gruyter.
  • Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation, With an introduction by Emanuel A. Schlegloff. Gail Jefferson (ed.) Oxford/ Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
  • Szczepek, Beatrice. 2000. "Functional Aspects of Collaborative Productions in English Conversation." InLiS 21. http://ling.sprachwiss.uni-konstanz.de/pages/anglistik/.
  • Smith, Carlota S. 2007. Tense and temporal interpretation. Science Direct. Lingua 117: 419-436[WoS]
  • Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986/96. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Stanley, Jason. 2007. Language in Context. Selected essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • van Berkum, J. J. A. 2008. "Understanding sentences in context: What brain waves can tell us." Current Directions in Psychological Science 17 (6): 376-380.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.hdl_11089_9596
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.