The Left or the Right? The Political Logic Behind the Economic Policies of the Communist Successor Parties in Central Europe

• Authors: Vincentas Vobolevičius
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In years following the regime change in central Europe, many communist successor parties (CSPs) have adopted relatively right-wing economic platforms. This paper explores why, upon entering the game of electoral competition, the CSPs have staked right-wing economic positions - as if trying to alienate the potential electorate among the have-nots of the post-communist transformations. Specifically, I propose that CSPs' economic policy is more representative of the interests of the parties' financial donors, rather than the electorate at large. I test this proposition by analyzing the stance that CSPs take towards signing of bilateral investment treaties (BITs). By attracting foreign investment, BITs change the competitive landscape of a host country in ways that are not always beneficial to the domestic companies, owned by supporters of CSPs. Therefore I expect CSP-controlled governments to be hesitant about signing BITs. The results of the statistical investigation support such a hypothesis, as well as the larger claim of the paper, namely, that the economic policy of the communist successor parties is primarily geared towards representing the interests of their financial supporters.

Keywords

EN

Communist successor parties; post-communist transformations; economic policy platforms; elections in Central Europe

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 2
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 139-164

Dates

published

2009-01-01

online

2010-01-25

Contributors

author

Vincentas Vobolevičius

• ISM University of Management and Economics, Lithuania

References

• Ishiyama, John T. "A Typology of Communist Successor Parties An Overview." In: Andras Bozoki and John T. Ishiyama, eds. The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. New York: M. E. Sharpe Inc., 2002.
• Bandelji, Nina. "Varieties of Capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe." Paper presented at the Society of Comparative Research, Graduate Student Retreat, May 9-10, 2003: 1-33 // http://www.princeton.edu/~scr/papers03/bandelj.pdf (accessed December 29, 2009).
• Bevan, Alan A., and Saul Estrin. "The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Transition Economies." William Davidson Institute working paper 342; Centre for New and Emerging Markets, London Business School, October, 2000: 1-39 //
• Bivol, Alex. "Bulgaria Adopts Flat Tax, Lowest in Europe." Novinite.com November 23, 2007 // http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=87803 (accessed December 27, 2009).
• Bunce, Valerie. "The Return of the Left and Democratic Consolidation in Poland and Hungary." In: Andras Bozoki and John T. Ishiyama, eds. The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. New York: M. E. Sharpe Inc., 2002.
• Cienski, Jan. "A Victim of its Own Success." Financial Times July 29, 2009 // http://media.ft.com/cms/df4c1042-7b80-11de-9772-00144feabdc0.pdf (accessed December 27, 2009).
• Crosby, Alan, and Matt Reynolds. "Victorious Slovak Leftists Vow to Break with Reforms." Reuters June 18, 2006 // http://www.redorbit.com/modules/news/tools.php?tool=print&id=541881 (accessed December 04, 2009).
• Druckman, James N., and Andrew Roberts. "Communist Successor Parties And Coalition Formation in Eastern Europe." Legislative Studies Quarterly 32:1 (February 2007): 5 - 31 // http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~jnd260/DruckmanRoberts_Feb07.pdf (accessed December 27, 2009).
• Economist Intelligence Unit. "Country Reports" //
• Frydman, Roman, Marek P. Hessel, and Andrzej Rapaczynski. "Why Ownership Matters. Entrepreneurship and the Restructuring of Enterprises in Central Europe." C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics working paper 00-03, New York University, April, 1998: 1-38 //
• Gallagher, Michael, Michael Laver, and Peter Mair. Representative Government In Modern Europe, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001.
• Grzymała-Busse, Anna Maria. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Successor Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
• Grzymała-Busse, Anna Maria. "Coalition Formation and the Regime Divide in New Democracies: East Central Europe." Comparative Politics 34 (October 2001): 85-104.
• Guerrieri, Paolo. "Trade Patterns, FDI, and Industrial Restructuring of Central and Eastern Europe." Paper presented at the BRIE Policy Conference: Foreign Direct Investment and Trade in Eastern Europe: The Creation of a Unified European Economy, July, 1998: 1-43 // http://brie.berkeley.edu/publications/WP124.pdf (accessed December 28, 2009).
• Haftel, Yoram. "The Effect of US BITs on FDI Inflows to Developing Countries: Signaling or Credible Commitment?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hotel, Chicago, IL, Apr 12, 2007: 1-33 // http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p198956_index.html (accessed December 29, 2009).
• Hanley, Seán. "The Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia after 1989 "Subcultural Party" to Neocommunist Force?": 141 - 165. In: Andras Bozoki and John T. Ishiyama, eds. The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. New York: M. E. Sharpe Inc., 2002.
• Hunya, Gabor. "Investors Strategies in New EU Members: Microeconomic, Macroeconomic and Sectoral Aspects." Universidad Complutense Madrid working paper #9, 1999: 1-74 //
• Ishiyama, John T. "Party Organization and the Political Success of the Communist Successor Parties." Social Science Quarterly 82:4 (December 2001): 844 - 864 // http://www.olemiss.edu/courses/pol628/ishiyama01.pdf (accessed December 27, 2009). [Crossref]
• Ishiyama, John T. "Communist Parties in Transition: Structures, Leaders and Processes of Democratization in Eastern Europe." Comparative Politics 27:2 (January, 1995): 146 - 177 // http://www.jstor.org/pss/422162 (accessed December 27, 2009).
• Jackson, John E., Bogdan W. Mach, and Radosław Markowski. "Electoral Success among Post-Communist Parties." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 1, 2005.
• Joshi, Mohit. "Recession-Crippled Lithuania to Raise VAT by 2 per Cent." Top News July 22, 2009 // http://www.topnews.in/recessioncrippled-lithuania-raise-vat-2-cent-2192196 (accessed December 27, 2009).
• Keen, Michael, Yitae Kim, and Ricardo Varsano. "The "Flat Tax(es)": Principles and Evidence." International Monetary Fund Working Paper 06/218, Washington, DC, September 2006: 1 - 48 //
• Kitschelt, Herbert. "Constraints and Opportunities in the Strategic Conduct of Post-Communist Successor Parties Regime Legacies as Causal Argument": 14 - 40. In: Andras Bozoki and John T. Ishiyama, eds. The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. New York: M. E. Sharpe Inc., 2002.
• Laver, Michael. Private Desires, Political Action. London: Sage Publications, 1997.
• McGillivray, Fiona. Privileging Industry: The Comparative Politics of Trade and Industrial Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.
• Murer, Jeffrey S. "The Romanian PDSR and the Bulgarian Socialists in Comparative Perspective": 367 - 397. In: Andras Bozoki and John T. Ishiyama, eds. The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. New York: M. E. Sharpe Inc., 2002.
• Pop-Eleches, Grigore. "Throwing out the Bums: Protest Voting and Anti-Establishment Parties after Communism." Paper prepared for delivery at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August 30-September 2, 2007 // http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/2/0/8/9/5/pages208958/p208958-1.php (accessed December 27, 2009).
• Pop-Eleches, Grigore, and Joshua A. Tucker. "Communism's Shadow: Post-Communist Legacies and Political Behavior." Paper presented at the Center for Political Studies Interdisciplinary Workshop on Politics and Policy, University of Michigan, June 3, 2009 // http://homepages.nyu.edu/~jat7/Pop-Eleches_Tucker_Legacies.pdf (accessed December 27, 2009).
• Ramonaitė, Ainė. "The Development of the Lithuanian Party System: From Stability to Perturbation": 69 - 88. In: Susanne Jungerstam-Mulders, ed. Post-communist EU Member States: Parties and Party Systems. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2006.
• Saving, Jason L. "Privatization and the Transition to a Market Economy." Economic and Financial Policy Review 1998:IV (Fourth quarter, 1998): 17-25. http://www.dallasfed.org/htm/pubs/pdfs/er/er98_04b.pdf (accessed December 28, 2009).
• Segert, Dieter. "The PDS Regional Party or the Second Social Democratic Party in Germany?": 166 - 187. In: Andras Bozoki and John T. Ishiyama, eds. The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. New York: M. E. Sharpe Inc., 2002.
• Socor, Vladimir. "Populist Third Wave in Lithuania's Parliamentary Elections." Eurasia Daily Monitor September 29, 2004 // http://www.jamestown.org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=26922 (accessed December 28, 2009).
• The Central Electoral Commission of the Republic of Lithuania. "Election to the Seimas and the Referendum on prolonging the work of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant of 12th October 2008" //
• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. "Country-specific Lists of BITs," June 1, 2009 //
• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. "Foreign Direct Investment and Development." UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements //
• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. "Inward FDI Performance Index - Results for 2005-2007." //
• Vachudová, Milada Anna. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10076-009-0014-8