Ograniczanie wyników
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 1

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Over the last decade, researchers have investigated to what extent cross-project defect prediction (CPDP) shows advantages over traditional defect prediction settings. These works do not take the training and testing data of defect prediction from the same project; instead, dissimilar projects are employed. Selecting the proper training data plays an important role in terms of the success of CPDP. In this study, a novel clustering method called complexFuzzy is presented for selecting the training data of CPDP. The method reveals the most defective instances that the experimental predictors exploit in order to complete the training. To that end, a fuzzy-based membership is constructed on the data sets. Hence, overfitting (which is a crucial problem in CPDP training) is alleviated. The performance of complexFuzzy is compared to its 5 counterparts on 29 data sets by utilizing 4 classifiers. According to the obtained results, complexFuzzy is superior to other clustering methods in CPDP performance.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.