Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 1

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The evaluation of the accuracy of generated DEMs using three remote sensing techniques on three types of forest road surfaces was performed. As a sample data, we used the forest road constructed from asphalt, concrete road slabs, and paving stones located in Víglaš, Central Slovakia.We evaluated the vertical accuracy of the DEMs produced by mobile laser scanning (MLS, Leica Pegasus, 840 pts/m2, airborne laser scanning (ALS, Leica ALS 70, 9 pts/m2, and aerial photogrammetry (AP, Leica RCD 30, 5 pts/m2. DEMs were generated in ArcGIS with a final resolution of 0.5m using the IDW method. The accuracy of DEMs was evaluated with the reference dataset on 700 check points. Regarding road surface capture quality, terrain generation, and point density, the MLS method dominates. It provides the RMSE values in range of ± 0.01 m to ± 0.03 m. The ALS method provided balanced RMSE results irrespective of surface type (RMSE ± 0.04 m to ± 0.05 m). The AP has the highest variability on all surface types (RMSE ± 0.12 m to ± 0.22 m). For AP, 0the decimeter-level accuracy is not sufficient for construction and maintenance purposes. This method provided the largest blunders at the road parts closest to the trees. ALS, with its ability to partially penetrate the forest canopy, can provide complex information about forest roads for inventory purposes. MLS provided the best spatial accuracy, enabling both construction and maintenance works. In any case, the advantage is that these data types can be combined.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.