Wyniki wyszukiwania - BazTech

Ograniczanie wyników

2 Acta Astronomica

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

A Short Answer to Critics of Our Article "Eppur si Espande"

Abramowicz M. A., Bajtlik S., Lasota J.-P., Moudens A.

Acta Astronomica

2009

Vol. 59, No. 1

131--135

Recently we presented a formal mathematical proof that, contrary to a widespread misconception, cosmological expansion cannot be understood as the motion of galaxies in non-expanding space. We showed that the cosmological redshift must be physically interpreted as the expansion of space. Although our proof was generally accepted, a few authors disagreed. We rebut their criticism in this Note.

Eppur si Espande

Abramowicz M. A., Bajtlik S., Lasota J.-P., Moudens A.

Acta Astronomica

2007

Vol. 57, No. 2

139--148

The rather wide-spread belief that cosmological expansion of a flat 3D-space (with spatial curvature k=0) cannot be observationally distinguished from a kinematics of galaxies moving in a flat and non-expanding space is erroneous. We suggest that the error may have its source in a non relativistic intuition that imagines the Universe not as a space-time but separates space from time and pictures the cosmological expansion as space evolving in time. The physical reality, however, is fundamentally different - the expanding Universe is necessarily a curved space-time. We show here that the fact that the space-time is curved implies that the interpretation of the observed cosmological redshift as being due to the expansion of the cosmological 3D-space is observationally verifiable. Thus it is impossible to mimic the true cosmological redshift by a Doppler effect caused by motion of galaxies in a non-expanding 3D-space, flat or curved. We summarize our points in simple space-time diagrams that illustrate a gedanken experiment distinguishing between expansion of space and pure kinematics. We also provide all relevant mathematics. None of the previously published discussions of the issue, including a recent popular Scientific American article by Lineveaver and Davis, offered a similarly clear way out of the confusion.